Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Static Analysis Results Interchange Format Metaschema module #659

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

david-waltermire
Copy link
Collaborator

@david-waltermire david-waltermire commented Jun 16, 2024

Committer Notes

Added minimal Metaschema module based on the Static Analysis Results Interchange Format (SARIF).

This uses #519 as a starting point and replaces that work.

Depends on #570, which needs to be merged first.

All Submissions:

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
  • Do all automated CI/CD checks pass?

Changes to Core Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you included examples of how to use your new feature(s)?
  • Have you updated all website](https://pages.nist.gov/metaschema) and readme documentation affected by the changes you made? Changes to the website can be made in the website/content directory of your branch.

@david-waltermire
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Note, the broken links are not caused by this PR. They are already broken in develop.

…check.sch as Metaschema external module constraints.
@david-waltermire
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This should be merged using "rebase and merge" to avoid merge conflicts in downstreams.

@iMichaela
Copy link
Collaborator

@david-waltermire - Could you do a rebase on the base branch to resolve the conflicts. Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants