feat(control_validator): add hold and lpf

[yuki-takagi-66]

Description

This PR add holding function and LPF for the velocity check.
in additon, velocity check is separated to two diags to trigger different MRM behavior.

Related links

launch PR: autowarefoundation/autoware_launch#1193

Parent Issue:

• Link

How was this PR tested?

tier4 internal tests

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[kyoichi-sugahara]

@yuki-takagi-66
Please update newly introduced parameter description in README and add parameter in the yaml file in the package with default value.

[kyoichi-sugahara]

@yuki-takagi-66
If there's no particular reason for removing the docstrings in this PR, it would be clearer to add them back in accordance with the changes. Or is it possible that they're being temporarily removed due to potential future changes?

Also, since I'm not familiar with the background of these changes, the processing seems fine to me. However, is it appropriate for me to approve without understanding the context or motivation behind these changes?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 34.61538% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 27.41%. Comparing base (dd6e677) to head (60df871).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...toware_control_validator/src/control_validator.cpp	34.61%	17 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9120   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.41%   27.41%           
=======================================
  Files        1302     1303    +1     
  Lines       95842    95894   +52     
  Branches    39128    39137    +9     
=======================================
+ Hits        26274    26289   +15     
- Misses      66912    66949   +37     
  Partials     2656     2656           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	5.71% <34.61%> (?)
total	27.41% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from dd6e677

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[yuki-takagi-66]

@kyoichi-sugahara
Thank you for the review.
I've update README and yaml in universe side.

I think we have no additional information to be added as docstrings from the function name and the arg names.
And we do not operate doxygen docs.
Therefore, I think we should not maintain the docstrings for this function, although we have option to maintain.

Also, since I'm not familiar with the background of these changes, the processing seems fine to me. However, is it appropriate for me to approve without understanding the context or motivation behind these changes?

Maybe it is not a sufficient description, LPF and hold is required to achieve the appropriate behavior along with MRM.
I've add some of descriptions.

[kyoichi-sugahara]

LGTM!