Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace parcel with tsup. Better types, better tsconfig. Move to ESM. #6468

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

sneridagh
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Deploy Preview for plone-components canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ef60fa1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/plone-components/deploys/67293d8074cffd0008d5abae

* main:
  Replace `parcel` with `tsup`. Better types, better tsconfig. Move to ESM. (#6467)
  [client] Replace `parcel` with `tsup` (#6466)
@sneridagh sneridagh merged commit ac52b6b into main Nov 4, 2024
66 checks passed
@sneridagh sneridagh deleted the replaceparcelwithtsupinproviders branch November 4, 2024 21:42
sneridagh added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
* main:
  Release 18.0.3
  Release @plone/registry 2.1.2
  Preparing for 18.0.3
  Fix weird issue in images build with typings (#6471)
  Release 18.0.2
  Release @plone/providers 1.0.0-alpha.5
  Release @plone/scripts 3.8.1
  Release @plone/components 2.1.1
  Fix packaging and plone/components src export (#6470)
  Release @plone/registry 2.1.1
  Repackage registry
  Release 18.0.1
  Release @plone/providers 1.0.0-alpha.4
  Release @plone/components 2.1.0
  Release @plone/client 1.0.0-alpha.20
  Release @plone/scripts 3.8.0
  Release @plone/registry 2.1.0
  Get rid of all appearances of parcel in core. (#6469)
  Replace parcel with tsup. Better types, better tsconfig. Move to ESM. (#6468)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants