-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify contracts description (896) #1208
Conversation
to distinguish (estimated) (maximum) values
Slightly updated last sentence on design contests
@JachymHercher Please click "Ready for review" unless this PR is still in draft. |
I left it as a draft intentionally, because I haven't yet drafted the guidance section. I'm waiting for #1123 with that (and perhaps I should wait also for getting started), see #896 (comment). |
@JachymHercher #1123 is merged, and you've now seen the Primer, so I think this issue is now unblocked. |
Ready for review, see #896 (comment) |
Remove the recommendation to use a single award for all suppliers entering a framework agreement.
ac81880
to
e93fe10
Compare
Notes on the merge:
I also added a commit for a broken link, that I assume also occurred in #1356. |
…o demand-side assessment. Clarify normative relationship between JSON and Excel/CSV. Rephrase to avoid repetition. Capitalize Primer. Copy-edit punctuation. Fix typo.
#896
together with #1216, addresses #903