-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: bump CAPI to v1.6.x #1115
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
/assign
44203ba
to
eff694b
Compare
yes, can you do that? |
@cpanato like so? kubernetes/test-infra#31690 |
/retest |
@cpanato looks like that didn't help much |
i will take a look this week |
It looks like that's because even the 1.28 image uses go 1.20.x
@cpanato Maybe we should try using the 1.29 one, which uses |
It looks like using 1.29 images is what CAPA is also doing for CAPI 1.6.x. |
/retest |
2c95dd9
to
ee3aba2
Compare
Hit rate limit |
Hmm |
/test ? |
@damdo: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
cloud/scope/machine.go
Outdated
if err != nil { | ||
return nil | ||
} | ||
|
||
return pointer.String(parsed.ID()) //nolint: staticcheck | ||
return ptr.To[string](parsed.ID()) //nolint: staticcheck |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
return ptr.To[string](parsed.ID()) //nolint: staticcheck | |
return ptr.To(parsed.ID()) //nolint: staticcheck |
All of these aren't needed, they're implicit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah you are right, although it's nice to have typing assertion there. I think it might be worth keeping them
2249c21
to
96fff48
Compare
96fff48
to
38a2eba
Compare
38a2eba
to
d067593
Compare
@cpanato @vincepri @richardcase I ran E2Es locally, found the issue and fixed them 🎉 |
Note for the reviewers: the apidiff is failing because I removed (the already deprecated) v1alpha3 as that has been deprecated by the core cluster-api project in 1.6.x and we depended on that in CAPG /api/v1alpha3. |
/test ls |
@cpanato: The specified target(s) for
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-conformance |
cool great job!!! |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-capi-e2e |
1 similar comment
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-gcp-capi-e2e |
@damdo: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@cpanato to check whether EDIT: it looks like it fails on "main" with the same issue, hence unrelated to this PR. |
@cpanato updated the comment above with the results of my test |
I see, thanks for the investigation, lets move forward with this one and try to fix that test in a follow up, and then after that we can cut a release thanks so much for working on this /approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, damdo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
This bumps main to use v1.6.1 of CAPI. It also bumps to use Go v1.21 and controller-runtime v0.16.3.
NOTES:
Note for the reviewers: the apidiff is failing because I removed (the already deprecated)
v1alpha3
as that has been deprecated by the core cluster-api project in 1.6.x and we depended on that in CAPG/api/v1alpha3
.TODOs:
Release note: