Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add more stackrox/acs metrics #103

Closed

Conversation

@davdhacs davdhacs marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 19:05
@davdhacs davdhacs requested review from a team as code owners September 18, 2024 19:05
@davdhacs
Copy link
Author

/cc @jtaleric

@davdhacs davdhacs force-pushed the rox-26061-more-stackrox-metrics branch from 188a9a9 to ef0abda Compare September 19, 2024 04:18
@@ -224,6 +224,788 @@
metricName: max-memory-stackrox
instant: true

# ACS - Central
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should add ACS metrics in this file, metrics here are for standard OCP deployments, how are you using it? There's not any ACS related workload in this repository

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you're using this metrics file from an external repo I recommend you to create a new metrics file with all the acs/stackrox stuff rather than modifying this one

Copy link
Author

@davdhacs davdhacs Sep 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I add a new metrics file, how do I use it? (ideally by changing arguments for the existing openshift-ci steps like for cluster-density)


Here's what I'm trying: openshift/release#56471
The alternatives I found add complexity that I would like to avoid (duplicating steps or modifying the e2e-benchmarking run.sh), or require changes to kube-burner-ocp code (like #102).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants