Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interactive tree layout and relative constraints for layered #125

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

soerendomroes
Copy link
Member

Based on interactive rework #121

@soerendomroes soerendomroes marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2024 16:12
@soerendomroes soerendomroes requested review from NiklasRentzCAU and removed request for NiklasRentzCAU March 12, 2024 10:16
Copy link
Member

@NiklasRentzCAU NiklasRentzCAU left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but I did not look through the changes in the interactive package in much detail.

@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@
},
"dependencies": {
"@kieler/klighd-core": "^0.4.2",
"@kieler/klighd-interactive": "^0.4.2",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a transient dependency, so we should not be required to repeat this dependency here

@NiklasRentzCAU
Copy link
Member

What are in general the new additions of this PR except for the interactive mr tree?

@soerendomroes
Copy link
Member Author

@NiklasRentzCAU This PR supersedes #121, which added relative constraints as well as generalized the interactive process.

@soerendomroes soerendomroes changed the title Interactive tree layout Interactive tree layout and relative constraints for layered Mar 13, 2024
@NiklasRentzCAU NiklasRentzCAU merged commit 1e9d85c into main Mar 14, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants