Input (continued) #2044
Open
Input (continued) #2044
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
feature definition
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Migrating the work from #1441
The Caniuse entries seem to line up, so @petele already did that 🎉
I fixed the descriptions to be clearer when they contain a list of
typevalues. I don't like the inconsistency w/ the single-type version, but is probably ok like this.The idea of variants of a specific attribute value for a specific element being standalone features seems fine, but I don't know if that fits into how we've been thinking about the
html-elementsgroup. Do we expect that group to be each element, once? Or is this fine?