Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tested SerializeForLogging for all known types implementing it #6447

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jakobht
Copy link
Contributor

@jakobht jakobht commented Oct 30, 2024

What changed?
Wrote tests for SerializeForLogging for all known structs implementing it

Why?
Improve test coverage

How did you test it?

Potential risks

Release notes

Documentation Changes

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.08%. Comparing base (40003fc) to head (8b22914).
Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

see 11 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 40003fc...8b22914. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant