Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DRAFT] Publish collection membership data to purl #823

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cbeer
Copy link
Member

@cbeer cbeer commented Apr 22, 2020

This supports several desirable features in PURL, but most particularly generating IIIF collection manifests for our collections. Before going further I'd like some validation of the approach and some indication this is worth pursuing (over, say, querying purl-fetcher.. which we've resisted in order to keep the PURL application querying static filesystem-based resources instead of those new-fangled databases people keep talking about)

The symlinks from an item to its collection duplicate information from the public xml, but are necessary (in this approach) in order to clean up inbound relationship links from the collection to the items. A separate file or something could be used instead, but this approach struck me as more resilient to potential concurrency issues.

TODO:

  • finish writing tests... planning to do it in the integration-test style used everywhere else in the spec except #transfer_metadata (formerly #publish, but the amount of stubbing was killing me)

@aaron-collier aaron-collier changed the title Publish collection membership data to purl [DRAFT] Publish collection membership data to purl Apr 27, 2020
@mjgiarlo mjgiarlo changed the base branch from master to main January 8, 2021 20:19
@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor

ndushay commented May 11, 2022

wow - this is old. Is it still useful? Can it be closed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants