Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update everything to SCIP #51

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update everything to SCIP #51

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

olafurpg
Copy link
Member

@olafurpg olafurpg commented Jun 9, 2022

Test plan

See the CI go green.

ckipp01 and others added 3 commits June 5, 2022 13:55
From looking at the recent changes to scip-java when you call index on a
project it expects the `sourcegraphScip` task to be there. This pr makes
the changes to align the task and setting names.
chore: bump sbt to 1.6.2 and move to unified slash syntax
@tanishiking
Copy link

Hey, I created a PR to revert the slash syntax to support sbt 0.13 #54 could you take a look at it?

file: dump.lsif
- name: cs launch scip-java
run: |
cs launch com.sourcegraph:lsif-java_2.13:latest.stable -M com.sourcegraph.lsif_java.LsifJava -- index

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
cs launch com.sourcegraph:lsif-java_2.13:latest.stable -M com.sourcegraph.lsif_java.LsifJava -- index
cs launch com.sourcegraph:scip-java_2.13:latest.stable -M com.sourcegraph.scip_java.ScipJava -- index

I confirmed it works in my local environment

ckipp01 added a commit to ckipp01/sbt-sourcegraph that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
This aligns CI a bit better with how it's being done in scip-java. It
also ensures actions/checkout is up to date and that the sourcegraph
upload is the newly recommended way of using the yarn installed `src`.

Supercedes sourcegraph#36
Relates to some CI changes in sourcegraph#51
Supercedes sourcegraph#56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants