Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: switch to control flow syntax #87

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

chintankavathia
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

  • Yes
  • No

If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...

Other information:

@chintankavathia chintankavathia marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2024 06:06
Copy link
Member

@timowolf timowolf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Many thanks for updating the syntax. I love it. I made some comments for improvements or questions.

}
}

<ng-template #bodyRow>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we need this template, should we than reuse it in line 117. Feels strange to have the same element here twice.

@timowolf
Copy link
Member

timowolf commented Oct 2, 2024

LGTM

@timowolf timowolf merged commit 504e15d into siemens:master Oct 2, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants