refactor: extend DABlock interface and make decodeBitmap public #29
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant DecodeBitmap
participant DABlock
Client->>DecodeBitmap: Call DecodeBitmap(skippedL1MessageBitmap, totalL1MessagePopped)
DecodeBitmap-->>Client: Return decodedBitmap, error
Client->>DABlock: Call Timestamp()
DABlock-->>Client: Return timestamp
Client->>DABlock: Call BaseFee()
DABlock-->>Client: Return base fee
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
encoding/bitmap_test.go (1)
42-43: LGTM! Consider expanding test coverage.The change from
decodeBitmaptoDecodeBitmapis consistent with the previous modifications. The additional error case test ensures comprehensive error handling for the public function.To further improve the test suite, consider adding more test cases that cover various edge cases and input scenarios for the newly public
DecodeBitmapfunction. This will help ensure its robustness and reliability across different use cases.encoding/bitmap.go (1)
68-68: LGTM! Consider adding a brief documentation comment.The renaming of
decodeBitmaptoDecodeBitmapis correct and aligns with Go's naming conventions for exported functions. This change successfully makes the function public as intended.Consider adding a brief documentation comment (godoc) above the function to describe its purpose and parameters, which is a best practice for public functions in Go. For example:
// DecodeBitmap decodes a skipped L1 message bitmap from bytes to big.Int slices. // It takes a byte slice representing the bitmap and the total number of L1 messages popped. // Returns a slice of *big.Int representing the decoded bitmap and an error if the input is invalid. func DecodeBitmap(skippedL1MessageBitmap []byte, totalL1MessagePopped int) ([]*big.Int, error) { // ... (existing function body) }This addition would improve the usability and maintainability of the public API.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- encoding/bitmap.go (1 hunks)
- encoding/bitmap_test.go (2 hunks)
- encoding/interfaces.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
encoding/bitmap_test.go (1)
39-40: LGTM! Error handling test updated correctly.The change from
decodeBitmaptoDecodeBitmapis consistent with the previous modification. The error case test remains intact, ensuring that the public function maintains proper error handling for invalid inputs.encoding/interfaces.go (1)
19-20: LGTM! Consider verifying existing implementations.The additions of
Timestamp()andBaseFee()methods to theDABlockinterface are logical and enhance its functionality by providing more block-related information. The return types are appropriate for their respective purposes.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please verify that all existing implementations of the
DABlockinterface have been updated to include these new methods. Run the following script to check for potential missing implementations:This script will help identify any structs that implement
DABlockand show if they have implementations for the newTimestamp()andBaseFee()methods.✅ Verification successful
All DABlock implementations include the new
Timestamp()andBaseFee()methods.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all implementations of DABlock interface and verify new methods # Search for struct types that implement DABlock echo "Searching for DABlock implementations:" rg -p "type \w+ struct" | rg -A 10 "DABlock" # Search for Timestamp and BaseFee method implementations echo "\nSearching for new method implementations:" rg "func \(\w+ \*?\w+\) (Timestamp|BaseFee)\(\)"Length of output: 413
Purpose or design rationale of this PR
extend DABlock interface and make decodeBitmap public
PR title
Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:
Breaking change label
Does this PR have the
breaking-changelabel?Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
DecodeBitmapfunction is now publicly accessible, allowing for external use in decoding bitmap data.Timestamp()andBaseFee()to theDABlockinterface, providing additional block-related information.Bug Fixes
decodeBitmaptoDecodeBitmap, ensuring proper error handling and validation.