Temporary fix and adding vacuum Actions #266
Conversation
Adding action for vacuum go_to. Signed-off-by: [email protected] <[email protected]>
|
Warning
|
| File | Change Summary |
|---|---|
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/__init__.py |
Added go_to service with vacuum_goto function; updated service registration and unloading logic. |
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/const.py |
Introduced constants CAMERA, VACUUM, and SENSOR from their respective domains. |
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/sensor.py |
Refactored VacuumSensor class methods for consistency; renamed _handle_coordinator_update to async_handle_coordinator_update. |
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/services.yaml |
Added new go_to service with required fields x_coord and y_coord. |
Poem
In a world of dust and cheer,
A vacuum's path is now quite clear.
With coordinates set, it zooms away,
Cleaning up, come what may!
So hop along, let’s give a cheer,
For thego_toservice now draws near! 🐇✨
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Generate unit testing code for this file.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/services.yaml (1)
32-35: Enhance target specification with device class.Consider adding a device class to better identify compatible vacuum devices.
Apply this change:
target: entity: integration: mqtt_vacuum_camera domain: vacuum + device_class: robotcustom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/__init__.py (1)
78-85: Document temporary implementation and plan forward.Since this is marked as a temporary fix in the PR title, please:
- Add a TODO comment explaining why this is temporary and what the final implementation should look like
- Create a follow-up ticket for implementing the actual vacuum control logic
- Consider adding integration tests to ensure the event handling works correctly
Would you like me to help create:
- A detailed TODO comment explaining the temporary nature of this fix?
- A GitHub issue for tracking the final implementation?
- Integration tests for the current event-based implementation?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
81-81: Local variable
xis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
x(F841)
82-82: Local variable
yis assigned to but never usedRemove assignment to unused variable
y(F841)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/sensor.py (1)
Line range hint
223-245: Consider improving invalid value handling.The current implementation sets invalid or missing values to 0, which might not be appropriate for all sensor types (e.g., timestamps, enums). Consider using
Noneor sensor-type-specific default values instead.Here's a suggested improvement:
- self._attr_native_value = ( - 0 # Set to None if the value is missing or invalid - ) + # Use appropriate defaults based on sensor type + if self.entity_description.device_class == SensorDeviceClass.ENUM: + self._attr_native_value = "unknown" + elif self.entity_description.device_class == SensorDeviceClass.TIMESTAMP: + self._attr_native_value = None + else: + self._attr_native_value = Nonecustom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/const.py (1)
12-14: Consider using domain constants directly.While the current implementation is functional, consider using the imported domain constants directly (e.g.,
VACUUM_DOMAIN) instead of creating aliases. This would reduce code redundancy and maintain a direct connection to Home Assistant's core constants.However, if these aliases serve a specific purpose in your codebase (like providing shorter names or maintaining backward compatibility), then the current implementation is acceptable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/__init__.py(4 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/const.py(1 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/sensor.py(3 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/services.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/sensor.py (1)
Learnt from: sca075
PR: sca075/mqtt_vacuum_camera#253
File: custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/sensor.py:181-185
Timestamp: 2024-09-20T12:59:21.376Z
Learning: In the current implementation, overriding `async_update` in `VacuumSensor` is necessary to ensure the sensors update correctly.
🪛 Ruff
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/__init__.py
81-81: Local variable x is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable x
(F841)
82-82: Local variable y is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable y
(F841)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/__init__.py (2)
33-33: LGTM: Import addition is correct.
The VACUUM constant import is properly placed and used consistently throughout the file.
167-167: LGTM: Service cleanup is correct.
The go_to service is properly removed during component unload.
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/sensor.py (2)
178-182: LGTM! Improved parameter formatting.
The constructor parameter formatting changes enhance readability while maintaining functionality.
201-201: LGTM! Improved async method naming.
The rename to async_handle_coordinator_update better follows Home Assistant's async naming conventions while maintaining the required coordinator update functionality.
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/const.py (1)
4-6: LGTM! Clean domain imports following Home Assistant conventions.
The imports are well-structured and follow Home Assistant's standard pattern for importing domain constants.
| x_coord: | ||
| name: X coordinate | ||
| description: x-coordinate | ||
| required: true | ||
| example: 26300 | ||
| selector: | ||
| text: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use number selector for x_coord instead of text.
Using a text selector for coordinates allows non-numeric input and lacks validation. Consider using a number selector with appropriate constraints.
Apply this change:
x_coord:
name: X coordinate
- description: x-coordinate
+ description: X coordinate in millimeters
required: true
example: 26300
selector:
- text:
+ number:
+ min: 0
+ max: 50000
+ step: 1
+ mode: box
+ unit_of_measurement: mm📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| x_coord: | |
| name: X coordinate | |
| description: x-coordinate | |
| required: true | |
| example: 26300 | |
| selector: | |
| text: | |
| x_coord: | |
| name: X coordinate | |
| description: X coordinate in millimeters | |
| required: true | |
| example: 26300 | |
| selector: | |
| number: | |
| min: 0 | |
| max: 50000 | |
| step: 1 | |
| mode: box | |
| unit_of_measurement: mm |
| @@ -25,3 +25,26 @@ | |||
| text: | |||
|
|
|||
| reset_trims: | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Complete the reset_trims service definition.
The reset_trims service is defined but lacks required fields such as name, description, and target. This could cause issues with service registration in Home Assistant.
Add the necessary fields:
reset_trims:
+ name: Reset Trims
+ description: Reset the vacuum's trim settings
+ target:
+ entity:
+ integration: mqtt_vacuum_camera
+ domain: vacuum📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| reset_trims: | |
| name: Reset Trims | |
| description: Reset the vacuum's trim settings | |
| target: | |
| entity: | |
| integration: mqtt_vacuum_camera | |
| domain: vacuum |
| y_coord: | ||
| name: Y coordinate | ||
| description: y-coordinate | ||
| required: true | ||
| example: 22500 | ||
| selector: | ||
| text: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use number selector for y_coord instead of text.
Similar to x_coord, y_coord should use a number selector for proper validation and better user experience.
Apply this change:
y_coord:
name: Y coordinate
- description: y-coordinate
+ description: Y coordinate in millimeters
required: true
example: 22500
selector:
- text:
+ number:
+ min: 0
+ max: 50000
+ step: 1
+ mode: box
+ unit_of_measurement: mm📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| y_coord: | |
| name: Y coordinate | |
| description: y-coordinate | |
| required: true | |
| example: 22500 | |
| selector: | |
| text: | |
| y_coord: | |
| name: Y coordinate | |
| description: Y coordinate in millimeters | |
| required: true | |
| example: 22500 | |
| selector: | |
| number: | |
| min: 0 | |
| max: 50000 | |
| step: 1 | |
| mode: box | |
| unit_of_measurement: mm |
| @@ -81,6 +94,7 @@ async def reset_trims(call: ServiceCall) -> None: | |||
|
|
|||
| # Register Services | |||
| hass.services.async_register(DOMAIN, "reset_trims", reset_trims) | |||
| hass.services.async_register(VACUUM, "go_to", vacuum_goto) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Initialize VACUUM domain data before service registration.
The service is registered under the VACUUM domain, but the corresponding domain data is never initialized. This will cause runtime errors when accessing hass.data[VACUUM].
Add initialization before service registration:
+ hass.data.setdefault(VACUUM, {})
hass.services.async_register(VACUUM, "go_to", vacuum_goto)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| hass.services.async_register(VACUUM, "go_to", vacuum_goto) | |
| hass.data.setdefault(VACUUM, {}) | |
| hass.services.async_register(VACUUM, "go_to", vacuum_goto) |
| async def vacuum_goto(call: ServiceCall) -> None: | ||
| """Vacuum Go To Action""" | ||
| entity_id = call.data["entity_id"] | ||
| x = call.data["x"] | ||
| y = call.data["y"] | ||
| vacuum = hass.data[VACUUM].get(entity_id) | ||
| _LOGGER.debug(f"Test {vacuum} Service on Vacuum Domain") | ||
| hass.bus.async_fire(f"event_{vacuum}_go_to", context=call.context) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Critical issues in vacuum_goto implementation confirmed
The verification confirms that hass.data[VACUUM] is never initialized in the codebase. The component uses DOMAIN for data storage, not VACUUM. Additionally, the function has other critical issues as noted in the original review.
Recommended fixes:
- Remove the incorrect
hass.data[VACUUM]access and use proper entity state management viahass.states.get(entity_id) - Include coordinates in the event data payload
- Add proper validation and error handling
- Improve logging messages
Here's the corrected implementation:
async def vacuum_goto(call: ServiceCall) -> None:
"""Handle vacuum go to coordinate command."""
try:
entity_id = call.data["entity_id"]
# Validate entity exists and is a vacuum
if not (vacuum := hass.states.get(entity_id)):
raise ValueError(f"Entity {entity_id} not found")
if vacuum.domain != VACUUM_DOMAIN:
raise ValueError(f"Entity {entity_id} is not a vacuum")
# Validate coordinates
x_coord = float(call.data["x"])
y_coord = float(call.data["y"])
_LOGGER.debug(
"Vacuum go_to service called for %s: x=%f, y=%f",
entity_id, x_coord, y_coord
)
# Fire event with coordinates
hass.bus.async_fire(
f"event_{entity_id}_go_to",
{"x": x_coord, "y": y_coord},
context=call.context
)
except (ValueError, KeyError) as err:
_LOGGER.error("Invalid parameters for vacuum_goto: %s", err)
raise🔗 Analysis chain
Multiple critical issues in vacuum_goto implementation.
The current implementation has several issues that need to be addressed:
- The coordinates (x, y) are retrieved but never used
hass.data[VACUUM]is accessed but this dictionary is never initialized- The debug message is unclear and seems like a test message
- Missing input validation for coordinates
- No error handling for invalid vacuum entity_id
- Implementation seems incomplete - only fires an event without actual vacuum control
Consider implementing proper error handling and validation:
async def vacuum_goto(call: ServiceCall) -> None:
"""Vacuum Go To Action"""
entity_id = call.data["entity_id"]
x = call.data["x"]
y = call.data["y"]
- vacuum = hass.data[VACUUM].get(entity_id)
- _LOGGER.debug(f"Test {vacuum} Service on Vacuum Domain")
- hass.bus.async_fire(f"event_{vacuum}_go_to", context=call.context)
+ try:
+ # Validate entity exists and is a vacuum
+ if not (vacuum := hass.states.get(entity_id)):
+ raise ValueError(f"Entity {entity_id} not found")
+
+ # Validate coordinates
+ x_coord = float(x)
+ y_coord = float(y)
+
+ _LOGGER.debug(
+ "Vacuum go_to service called for %s: x=%f, y=%f",
+ entity_id, x_coord, y_coord
+ )
+
+ # Fire event with validated coordinates
+ hass.bus.async_fire(
+ f"event_{entity_id}_go_to",
+ {"x": x_coord, "y": y_coord},
+ context=call.context
+ )
+ except ValueError as err:
+ _LOGGER.error("Invalid parameters for vacuum_goto: %s", err)
+ raiseLet's verify if the VACUUM domain data is initialized anywhere:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for VACUUM dictionary initialization
rg "hass\.data\[VACUUM\].*=|hass\.data\.setdefault\(VACUUM"
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for VACUUM constant definition and its usage
rg "VACUUM\s*=.*" -A 2
# Also search for any setup/async_setup functions that might initialize data
ast-grep --pattern 'async def async_setup($_) {
$$$
}'
# And check for any other vacuum-related data initialization
rg "\.data\[.*vacuum.*\].*=|\.data\.setdefault.*vacuum" -i
Length of output: 329
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the async_setup implementation and any data initialization
rg -A 10 "async def (async_setup|async_setup_entry)" custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/
# Also check for any VACUUM_DOMAIN usage
rg "VACUUM_DOMAIN" -A 2
Length of output: 5532
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
81-81: Local variable x is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable x
(F841)
82-82: Local variable y is assigned to but never used
Remove assignment to unused variable y
(F841)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
go_toservice that allows users to direct the vacuum to specific coordinates.CAMERA,VACUUM, andSENSORto enhance integration capabilities.Bug Fixes
Documentation
services.yamlto include details for the newgo_toservice, including required fields and examples.