Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rename expected_lifetime field #338 #400

Merged

Conversation

asuresh-code
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Enter a description of the changes here

Testing instructions

Add a set up instructions describing how the reviewer should test the code

  • Review code
  • Check Actions build
  • Review changes to test coverage
  • {more steps here}

Agile board tracking

connect to #338

@asuresh-code asuresh-code self-assigned this Oct 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.87%. Comparing base (86211c4) to head (88ee7ab).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #400   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.87%   97.87%           
========================================
  Files           41       41           
  Lines         1504     1504           
========================================
  Hits          1472     1472           
  Misses          32       32           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@joelvdavies joelvdavies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are still a few mentions of expected_lifetime e.g. in the migration script on line 2, and in the logging. (I used the search tab on vscode to find them). The mock data also needs updating.

Copy link
Collaborator

@joelvdavies joelvdavies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@asuresh-code asuresh-code merged commit 4cd69d8 into develop Oct 25, 2024
8 checks passed
@asuresh-code asuresh-code deleted the add-expected-lifetime-field-to-cataolgue-items-#338 branch October 25, 2024 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants