Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.2 #999

Merged
merged 1,040 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

0.2 #999

merged 1,040 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

alecandido
Copy link
Member

Since we're now blocking features on 0.1, and we have a dedicated branch, https://github.com/qiboteam/qibolab/tree/0.1, it should be the proper time to make https://github.com/qiboteam/qibolab/tree/0.2 the actual main (i.e. the branch receiving new features).

@alecandido alecandido added this to the Qibolab 0.2.0 milestone Aug 21, 2024
@alecandido
Copy link
Member Author

@stavros11 @hay-k just to be clear: I'm not requesting an actual review, all the content has already been reviewed before...

@qiboteam qiboteam deleted a comment from codecov bot Aug 28, 2024
alecandido and others added 24 commits August 29, 2024 00:26
They are just checking the result shape, which is already covered in dedicated tests
Mostly redundant, it should be replaced with a test on the exact type returned by Platform.execute, in #964
For dummy it is a trivial combination of a sweeper, and addressing a coupler, which are both separately tested
The fast reset option is ineffective on dummy, and it's not yet implemented in any driver either
Extend `Config` beyond channels
Make `Sweeper` pydantic `Model` and introduce `range`
@qiboteam qiboteam deleted a comment from codecov bot Sep 19, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 62.85714% with 325 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 51.95%. Comparing base (c180cd9) to head (baeed90).
Report is 274 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/qibolab/_core/instruments/qm/controller.py 0.00% 114 Missing ⚠️
...c/qibolab/_core/instruments/qm/program/sweepers.py 0.00% 60 Missing ⚠️
...bolab/_core/instruments/qm/program/instructions.py 0.00% 28 Missing ⚠️
src/qibolab/_core/instruments/qm/config/config.py 0.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
src/qibolab/_core/instruments/qm/config/devices.py 0.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
src/qibolab/_core/instruments/zhinst/executor.py 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
...ibolab/_core/instruments/qm/program/acquisition.py 0.00% 11 Missing ⚠️
.../qibolab/_core/instruments/qm/program/arguments.py 0.00% 11 Missing ⚠️
src/qibolab/_core/instruments/qm/__init__.py 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
...qibolab/_core/instruments/qm/components/configs.py 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
... and 19 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #999      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   51.58%   51.95%   +0.37%     
==========================================
  Files          58       63       +5     
  Lines        2749     2808      +59     
==========================================
+ Hits         1418     1459      +41     
- Misses       1331     1349      +18     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 51.95% <62.85%> (+0.37%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@stavros11 stavros11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did a final test on hardware and the updated routines seem to work: http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/xLTo088LTjKn-W5Bnr5Pqw==

Of course, this doesn't cover everything we would like to do with qibolab 0.2, but hopefully we will be able to fix potential bugs in later releases without breaking the public interface.

@alecandido @scarrazza if you agree, we can merge this and release.

@alecandido
Copy link
Member Author

alecandido commented Sep 20, 2024

@alecandido @scarrazza if you agree, we can merge this and release.

I agree, thanks a lot for the final tests!

@scarrazza
Copy link
Member

Let me release qibo first and then update poetry before merging this.

@scarrazza
Copy link
Member

@alecandido @stavros11 @hay-k thanks a lot for the great effort!

@scarrazza scarrazza merged commit 78b02a1 into main Sep 20, 2024
28 checks passed
@stavros11 stavros11 deleted the 0.2 branch September 20, 2024 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants