Review of #690 by @olshansk #699
Conversation
Olshansk
added
miner
WalkthroughThe changes significantly revamp the relay difficulty management in the system. The previous numerical representation of minimum relay difficulty has been replaced with a more flexible byte array, allowing for complex hashing mechanisms. This update impacts various components, including parameter validation, mining logic, and testing frameworks, ensuring a robust and adaptable approach to relay mining dynamics. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant A as Miner
participant B as Params
participant C as Difficulty Protocol
participant D as Relay
A->>B: Request RelayDifficultyTargetHash
B-->>A: RelayDifficultyTargetHash
A->>C: Validate RelayDifficulty with Hash
C-->>A: Validation Result
A->>D: Adjust Mining Difficulty
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (6)
pkg/crypto/protocol/hash.go (1)
6-14: Inconsistent error handling forhasher.Write.The error handling for
hasher.Writeis inconsistent across the codebase. In some instances, errors are ignored, while in others, they are handled by returning or panicking.
Ignored errors:
pkg/crypto/protocol/hash.go(lines 6-14)Handled errors:
pkg/relayer/miner/gen/gen_fixtures.go(lines 6-10)pkg/crypto/protocol/proof_path.go(lines 6-10)Please ensure consistent error handling to follow best practices.
Analysis chain
Verify the error handling.
Ensure that ignoring the error from
hasher.Writeis intentional and follows best practices.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of hasher.Write. Expect: Error handling is consistent and follows best practices. rg --type go -A 5 $'hasher.Write'Length of output: 1384
proto/poktroll/proof/params.proto (1)
15-17: The fieldmin_relay_difficulty_bitshas not been fully replaced byrelay_difficulty_target_hash.The following files still contain references to the old field
min_relay_difficulty_bitsand need to be updated:
tools/scripts/params/proof_all.jsontools/scripts/params/proof_min_relay_difficulty_bits.jsone2e/tests/update_params.featuredocusaurus/docs/develop/developer_guide/adding_params.mdMakefiledocs/static/openapi.ymlPlease ensure that all references to
min_relay_difficulty_bitsare updated torelay_difficulty_target_hash.Analysis chain
Verify the usage of the new field
relay_difficulty_target_hash.Ensure that all references to the old field
min_relay_difficulty_bitsare updated to use the new fieldrelay_difficulty_target_hash.
Verify the usage of the new field
relay_difficulty_target_hash.Ensure that all references to the old field
min_relay_difficulty_bitsare updated to use the new fieldrelay_difficulty_target_hash.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the old field `min_relay_difficulty_bits` are updated to use the new field `relay_difficulty_target_hash`. # Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new field. rg --type proto 'min_relay_difficulty_bits|relay_difficulty_target_hash'Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the old field `min_relay_difficulty_bits` are updated to use the new field `relay_difficulty_target_hash`. # Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new field. rg 'min_relay_difficulty_bits|relay_difficulty_target_hash'Length of output: 4453
x/tokenomics/keeper/scale_difficulty_test.go (1)
18-23: Consider adding more descriptive test case names.The current test case descriptions are brief and might not provide enough context. Consider adding more descriptive names to make the test cases clearer.
- desc: "Scale by 0.5" + desc: "Scale maximum target hash by 0.5"x/proof/keeper/params_test.go (1)
24-25: Ensure proper type forrelayDifficultyTargetHash.The type
anyis used forrelayDifficultyTargetHash. To improve type safety and consistency across the codebase, consider changing the type to[]byte.
- File:
x/proof/keeper/params_test.go- Lines: 24-25
Analysis chain
Ensure proper type for
relayDifficultyTargetHash.The type
anyis used forrelayDifficultyTargetHash. Consider using a more specific type if possible to improve type safety.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all occurrences of `relayDifficultyTargetHash` in the codebase to ensure proper type usage. # Test: Search for the variable usage. Expect: Proper type usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'relayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 7019
x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty_test.go (1)
131-132: Ensure consistent use of leading zero bits.The target hash is now set to ensure at least 8 leading zero bits in one instance. This change should be consistently applied across all relevant tests.
x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty_test.go: Ensure similar changes are applied to other relevant test cases.Analysis chain
Ensure consistent use of leading zero bits.
The target hash is now set to ensure at least 8 leading zero bits. This change should be consistently applied across all relevant tests.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash across all tests. # Test: Search for the target hash initialization. Expect: Consistent use of leading zero bits. rg --type go -A 5 $'[]byte{0b00000000}'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash across all tests. # Test: Search for the target hash initialization. Expect: Consistent use of leading zero bits. rg --type go -A 5 '[]byte{0b00000000}'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash across all tests. # Test: Search for the target hash initialization. Expect: Consistent use of leading zero bits. rg --type go -A 5 '\[\]byte{0b00000000}'Length of output: 136
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash across all tests. # Test: Search for the target hash initialization. Expect: Consistent use of leading zero bits. rg --type go -A 5 '\[\]byte\{0b00000000\}'Length of output: 506
api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go (1)
221-222: Add tests forrelay_difficulty_target_hashin the codebase.The current tests do not verify the correct handling of
relay_difficulty_target_hash. Please add tests to ensure its correct handling.
- Add tests in
message_update_param_test.goor other relevant test files to verify the correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hash.Analysis chain
Ensure correct handling of
relay_difficulty_target_hashinSetmethod.The updated
Setmethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the method is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.
Verify the usage and testing of
relay_difficulty_target_hashin the codebase.To ensure the correct handling of
relay_difficulty_target_hashin theSetmethod, we need to verify if this parameter is used and tested elsewhere in the codebase.
Verify the tests for
relay_difficulty_target_hashinmessage_update_param_test.go.To ensure the correct handling of
relay_difficulty_target_hash, we need to verify the tests inmessage_update_param_test.go.
Verify the presence of tests for
relay_difficulty_target_hashin other test files.To ensure the correct handling of
relay_difficulty_target_hash, we need to verify if there are tests in other files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of the `Set` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Set` method. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'Set'Length of output: 183428
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `relay_difficulty_target_hash` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `relay_difficulty_target_hash`. Expect: Usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'relay_difficulty_target_hash'Length of output: 1989
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the tests for `relay_difficulty_target_hash` in `message_update_param_test.go`. # Test: Search for the usage of `relay_difficulty_target_hash` in `message_update_param_test.go`. Expect: Tests related to this parameter. rg --type go 'relay_difficulty_target_hash' x/proof/types/message_update_param_test.goLength of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the tests for `relay_difficulty_target_hash` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `relay_difficulty_target_hash` in test files. Expect: Tests related to this parameter. rg --type go --glob '*_test.go' 'relay_difficulty_target_hash'Length of output: 158
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
x/proof/types/params.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (34)
- api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go (15 hunks)
- e2e/tests/parse_params_test.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/tests/update_params.feature (2 hunks)
- e2e/tests/update_params_test.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/client/interface.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/crypto/protocol/difficulty.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/crypto/protocol/difficulty_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/crypto/protocol/hash.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/crypto/protocol/hasher.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/crypto/rand/integer.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/relayer/miner/gen/gen_fixtures.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/relayer/miner/miner.go (4 hunks)
- pkg/relayer/miner/miner_test.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/relayer/miner/options.go (1 hunks)
- proto/poktroll/proof/params.proto (1 hunks)
- telemetry/event_counters.go (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/tokenomics/relay_mining_difficulty_test.go (1 hunks)
- testutil/testrelayer/relays.go (3 hunks)
- x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof.go (3 hunks)
- x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof_test.go (8 hunks)
- x/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param.go (1 hunks)
- x/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/proof/keeper/msg_update_params_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/proof/keeper/params_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/proof/types/message_update_param.go (2 hunks)
- x/proof/types/message_update_param_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/proof/types/params.go (6 hunks)
- x/service/types/relay.go (2 hunks)
- x/tokenomics/keeper/msg_server_update_param_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/tokenomics/keeper/scale_difficulty_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/tokenomics/keeper/settle_pending_claims.go (1 hunks)
- x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty.go (5 hunks)
- x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty_test.go (7 hunks)
- x/tokenomics/module/abci.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- pkg/relayer/miner/gen/gen_fixtures.go
- x/tokenomics/keeper/msg_server_update_param_test.go
- x/tokenomics/keeper/settle_pending_claims.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: go-test
tests/integration/tokenomics/relay_mining_difficulty_test.go
[failure] 122-122:
undefined: prooftypes.DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashHex
[failure] 123-123:
undefined: prooftypes.DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashHex (typecheck)
Additional comments not posted (80)
pkg/relayer/miner/options.go (2)
5-8: LGTM!The function
WithRelayDifficultyTargetHashis correctly implemented.
5-8: Verify the type assertion.Ensure that the type assertion
mnr.(*miner)is safe and doesn't cause runtime errors. Consider adding a type check or handling the potential panic.Verification successful
Verify the type assertion.
Ensure that the type assertion
mnr.(*miner)is safe and doesn't cause runtime errors. Consider adding a type check or handling the potential panic.
Verify the type assertion.
Ensure that the type assertion
mnr.(*miner)is safe and doesn't cause runtime errors. Consider adding a type check or handling the potential panic.
Verify the type assertion.
Ensure that the type assertion
mnr.(*miner)is safe and doesn't cause runtime errors. Consider adding a type check or handling the potential panic.
Verify the type assertion.
The type assertion
mnr.(*miner)is safe as theminerstruct implements therelayer.Minerinterface, evidenced by the presence of theMinedRelaysmethod.
pkg/relayer/miner/miner.go: Methods likeMinedRelaysconfirm thatminerimplements therelayer.Minerinterface.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type assertion for miner in the codebase. # Test: Search for the miner type definition. Expect: miner type is correctly defined and used. rg --type go -A 5 $'type miner'Length of output: 442
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the miner struct implements the relayer.Miner interface. # Test: Search for the relayer.Miner interface definition and check if miner implements it. rg --type go -A 10 'type Miner interface' rg --type go -A 10 'func (m *miner)'Length of output: 688
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the miner struct implements the relayer.Miner interface by checking implemented methods. # Test: Search for methods implemented by *miner and compare with relayer.Miner interface methods. rg --type go 'func (m *miner)' -A 5Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the miner struct implements the relayer.Miner interface by checking implemented methods. # Test: Search for all methods in the pkg/relayer/miner package. rg --type go 'func ' pkg/relayer/miner/Length of output: 1469
pkg/crypto/protocol/hasher.go (2)
6-6: LGTM!The new constant
RelayHasherSizeis correctly defined.
14-15: LGTM!The new variable
NewRelayHasheris correctly declared and grouped withNewTrieHasher.pkg/crypto/protocol/hash.go (1)
6-14: LGTM!The function
GetRelayHashFromBytesis correctly implemented.pkg/crypto/rand/integer.go (1)
21-29: Important considerations for future improvements.The comments highlight crucial issues regarding language-agnosticism and precision loss in the pseudo-random number generator. These are important considerations for future improvements to ensure compatibility and robustness.
x/proof/keeper/msg_update_params_test.go (1)
45-46: Enhanced test coverage with new fieldRelayDifficultyTargetHash.The addition of
RelayDifficultyTargetHashto theParamsstruct in the test case improves the test coverage and ensures that the new parameter is properly validated.x/proof/types/message_update_param_test.go (3)
31-31: Updated test case for invalid parameter name.The change from
"WRONG_min_relay_difficulty_bits"to"WRONG_relay_difficulty_target_hash"reflects the new focus of parameter validation. Ensure that this aligns with the updated validation logic.
40-40: Updated test case for incorrect parameter type.The change from
ParamMinRelayDifficultyBitstoParamRelayDifficultyTargetHashand the type fromMsgUpdateParam_AsInt64toMsgUpdateParam_AsBytesreflects the new parameter validation logic. Ensure that this aligns with the updated validation logic.
48-49: Updated test case for valid parameter.The change to
ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHashand the type toMsgUpdateParam_AsBytesreflects the new expected data type for the parameter being validated. Ensure that this aligns with the updated validation logic.pkg/crypto/protocol/difficulty.go (4)
4-6: LGTM! New imports are necessary for the new functionality.The added imports
bytes,encoding/hex, andmath/bigare required for the new hash difficulty calculations.
9-21: LGTM! New global variable is necessary for baseline difficulty calculations.The global variable
BaseRelayDifficultyHashBzis defined as a decoded hexadecimal string representing the "highest" target hash, establishing a baseline for difficulty calculations.
24-33: LGTM! New function for calculating hash difficulty is well-implemented.The
GetDifficultyFromHashfunction calculates the difficulty of a given hash relative to the baseline difficulty hash using themath/bigpackage for precise calculations.
35-43: LGTM! New function for determining relay volume applicability is well-implemented.The
IsRelayVolumeApplicablefunction determines if a relay's hash is less than a specified target hash using thebytes.Comparemethod.x/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param.go (1)
26-37: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new parameterParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash.The changes to the
UpdateParamfunction are well-implemented.However, ensure that all references to the old parameter
ParamMinRelayDifficultyBitsare updated to use the new parameterParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash.Verification successful
Verified! All references to the old parameter
ParamMinRelayDifficultyBitshave been updated to use the new parameterParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash.The changes are consistently applied throughout the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the old parameter `ParamMinRelayDifficultyBits` are updated to use the new parameter `ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. # Test: Search for the parameter usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new parameter. rg --type go 'ParamMinRelayDifficultyBits|ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 815
x/proof/types/message_update_param.go (2)
63-73: LGTM!The method
paramTypeIsBytescorrectly checks if the parameter type is a byte slice.
50-51: Ensure consistent usage ofparamTypeIsBytes.The change to validate
ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHashusingparamTypeIsBytesappears correct. Ensure that this new validation method is consistently used throughout the codebase where applicable.Verification successful
Ensure consistent usage of
paramTypeIsBytes.The change to validate
ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHashusingparamTypeIsBytesappears correct and is consistently applied across the codebase where applicable. The validation logic inx/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param.gois equivalent toparamTypeIsBytes.
x/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param.go: Validation ensures the value is of type*types.MsgUpdateParam_AsBytes.x/proof/types/message_update_param.go: UsesparamTypeIsBytesdirectly.x/proof/types/params.go: Contains definitions without validation logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `paramTypeIsBytes`. # Test: Search for the usage of `paramTypeIsBytes`. Expect: Consistent usage throughout the codebase. rg --type go 'paramTypeIsBytes'Length of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash` is used elsewhere in the codebase and check for consistent validation. # Test: Search for the usage of `ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. Expect: Identify all instances and check if `paramTypeIsBytes` is used for validation. rg --type go 'ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 785
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `paramTypeIsBytes` or equivalent validation is used in all relevant instances of `ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. # Test: Search for the usage of `ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash` in non-test files and examine the context for validation logic. rg --type go 'ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash' -g '!*_test.go' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 2624
x/tokenomics/module/abci.go (4)
30-34: Relocate logging to reflect final state.The logging of settled and expired claims has been moved to a more appropriate location after the claims have been settled. This change ensures that the logged values reflect the final state of the process.
Line range hint
36-54:
Defer telemetry calls to reference final values.The telemetry calls have been deferred to ensure that they reference the final values of relevant variables. This change emphasizes the importance of accurate telemetry reporting.
84-93: Enhance telemetry for relay mining difficulty.The loop that emits telemetry for each service's relay mining difficulty has been updated to include the new variable
newRelayMiningTargetHash. This change enhances the clarity and accuracy of the telemetry data being reported.
8-8: Ensure the new import is necessary.The new import statement for the
protocolpackage indicates the integration of additional cryptographic functionality. Verify that this new import is necessary and used appropriately.Verification successful
The new import is necessary.
The
protocolpackage is utilized within the filex/tokenomics/module/abci.go, confirming the necessity of the import statement.
x/tokenomics/module/abci.go: Lines whereprotocolis used:
var newRelayMiningTargetHash [protocol.RelayHasherSize]bytedifficulty := protocol.GetDifficultyFromHash(newRelayMiningTargetHash)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the necessity of the new import statement for the `protocol` package. # Test: Search for the usage of the `protocol` package. Expect: Appropriate usage throughout the codebase. rg --type go 'protocol'Length of output: 11463
pkg/crypto/protocol/difficulty_test.go (3)
11-36: Refactor improves readability and clarity.The refactor of the
TestGetDifficultyFromHashfunction improves readability and clarity by using descriptive test case fields and hexadecimal string representations.
56-102: LGTM!The addition of the
TestIsRelayVolumeApplicablefunction enhances the test coverage by checking if the relay hash is applicable to the target hash based on various conditions.
39-53: Ensure comprehensive test coverage.The test cases cover multiple scenarios for different difficulty levels. Ensure that all relevant scenarios are covered and that the test cases are comprehensive.
Verification successful
Comprehensive test coverage verified.
The test cases in
difficulty_test.gocover multiple scenarios for different difficulty levels, andGetDifficultyFromHashis also used within the proof submission logic tested inmsg_server_submit_proof_test.go. The test coverage appears to be comprehensive.
pkg/crypto/protocol/difficulty_test.go: Contains detailed test cases forGetDifficultyFromHash.x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof_test.go: Tests the usage ofGetDifficultyFromHashwithin proof submission logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify comprehensive test coverage for `TestGetDifficultyFromHash`. # Test: Search for additional test cases for `GetDifficultyFromHash`. Expect: Comprehensive test coverage. rg --type go 'GetDifficultyFromHash'Length of output: 1099
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract test cases from difficulty_test.go rg --type go -A 10 'func Test' pkg/crypto/protocol/difficulty_test.go # Extract test cases from msg_server_submit_proof_test.go rg --type go -A 10 'func Test' x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof_test.goLength of output: 2239
pkg/relayer/miner/miner.go (4)
97-98: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new field.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all instances of
relayDifficultyTargetHashin the codebase are correctly updated.
120-120: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new method.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all instances of
IsRelayVolumeApplicablein the codebase are correctly updated.Verification successful
Verification Successful!
The
IsRelayVolumeApplicablemethod is correctly updated and consistently used across the codebase.
x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof.gopkg/relayer/miner/miner.gopkg/crypto/protocol/difficulty.gopkg/crypto/protocol/difficulty_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `IsRelayVolumeApplicable` are correctly updated. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method. rg --type go -A 5 $'IsRelayVolumeApplicable'Length of output: 2545
28-33: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new field.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all instances of
relayDifficultyTargetHashin the codebase are correctly updated.Verification successful
LGTM! The usage of
relayDifficultyTargetHashis correctly integrated across the codebase.The field
relayDifficultyTargetHashhas been appropriately added and utilized in various parts of the codebase, including tests, protobuf definitions, and other Go files. There are no discrepancies or missing updates related to this field.
e2e/tests/update_params_test.gox/proof/types/params.gox/proof/types/params.pb.gox/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param.gox/proof/keeper/params_test.gopkg/relayer/miner/options.gopkg/relayer/miner/miner.goapi/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `relayDifficultyTargetHash` are correctly updated. # Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new field. rg --type go -A 5 $'relayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 7019
43-43: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new option.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all instances of
NewMinerin the codebase use the newWithRelayDifficultyTargetHashoption.pkg/relayer/miner/miner_test.go (2)
46-46: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new option.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all instances of
WithRelayDifficultyTargetHashin the test code are correctly updated.Verification successful
LGTM! But verify the usage of the new option.
The code changes are approved.
- The
WithRelayDifficultyTargetHashoption is correctly updated and used in the test code.- No outdated or incorrect usages were found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `WithRelayDifficultyTargetHash` are correctly updated. # Test: Search for the option usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new option. rg --type go -A 5 $'WithRelayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 1205
26-26: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new variable.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all instances of
testRelayMiningTargetHashin the test code are correctly updated.Verification successful
Verification Successful: No issues found.
The variable
testRelayMiningTargetHashhas been correctly introduced and all instances of the old variabletestDifficultyhave been removed. The changes are properly implemented.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `testRelayMiningTargetHash` are correctly updated. # Test: Search for the variable usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new variable. rg --type go -A 5 $'testRelayMiningTargetHash'Length of output: 1018
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of the old variable `testDifficulty` have been replaced. # Test: Search for the old variable usage. Expect: No occurrences of the old variable. rg --type go -A 5 $'testDifficulty'Length of output: 34
x/proof/keeper/params_test.go (1)
33-34: Add validation forDefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHash.Ensure that
DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashis properly validated in the test case.Verification successful
Validation for
DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashis already present and sufficient.The
ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHashfunction inx/proof/types/params.goensures that the relay difficulty target hash is of the correct type and length. The test cases inx/proof/keeper/params_test.goalready include calls to this validation function, ensuring the integrity ofDefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHash.
- The function
ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHashverifies the type and length of the target hash.- Test cases in
params_test.goindirectly validateDefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashby using this function.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the value and validation of `DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. # Test: Search for the variable usage. Expect: Proper validation. rg --type go -A 5 $'DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 4936
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect test cases for validation of `DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. # Search for test cases involving `DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHash` in `params_test.go` and `update_relay_mining_difficulty_test.go`. rg --type go -A 10 'DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHash' x/proof/keeper/params_test.go x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty_test.goLength of output: 2071
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. # Search for the implementation of `ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. rg --type go 'func ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash' # Search for test cases that use `ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash` in `params_test.go`. rg --type go 'ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash' x/proof/keeper/params_test.goLength of output: 305
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the implementation of `ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. # Display the implementation of `ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash` in `params.go`. rg --type go -A 10 'func ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash' x/proof/types/params.goLength of output: 443
x/service/types/relay.go (3)
14-20: Ensure proper handling ofprotocol.RelayHasherSize.The function
GetHashnow usesprotocol.RelayHasherSize. Ensure thatprotocol.RelayHasherSizeis properly defined and used consistently.Verification successful
Verified: Proper handling of
protocol.RelayHasherSize.The function
GetHashusesprotocol.RelayHasherSize, which is consistently defined and used across the codebase. The definition inpkg/crypto/protocol/hasher.goconfirms that it is set to the SHA-256 hash size, ensuring correctness.
pkg/crypto/protocol/hasher.go:
RelayHasherSize = sha256.SizeScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of `protocol.RelayHasherSize`. # Test: Search for the variable usage. Expect: Proper definition and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'RelayHasherSize'Length of output: 6589
26-37: Ensure proper handling ofprotocol.RelayHasherSizeinRelayRequest.The function
GetSignableBytesHashforRelayRequestnow usesprotocol.RelayHasherSize. Ensure thatprotocol.RelayHasherSizeis properly defined and used consistently.Verification successful
Ensure proper handling of
protocol.RelayHasherSizeinRelayRequest.The function
GetSignableBytesHashforRelayRequestusesprotocol.RelayHasherSize, which is properly defined assha256.Sizeinpkg/crypto/protocol/hasher.goand used consistently across the codebase.
pkg/crypto/protocol/hasher.go:RelayHasherSize = sha256.Sizex/service/types/relay.go: Multiple functions includingGetSignableBytesHash,GetHash, etc.- Other files:
x/tokenomics/module/abci.go,x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof.go,x/proof/types/params.go, etc.This confirms that
protocol.RelayHasherSizeis properly defined and used consistently.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of `protocol.RelayHasherSize` in `RelayRequest`. # Test: Search for the variable usage. Expect: Proper definition and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'RelayHasherSize'Length of output: 6589
68-79: Ensure proper handling ofprotocol.RelayHasherSizeinRelayResponse.The function
GetSignableBytesHashforRelayResponsenow usesprotocol.RelayHasherSize. Ensure thatprotocol.RelayHasherSizeis properly defined and used consistently.Verification successful
Ensure proper handling of
protocol.RelayHasherSizeinRelayResponse.The function
GetSignableBytesHashforRelayResponsenow usesprotocol.RelayHasherSize. The definition and usage ofprotocol.RelayHasherSizeare consistent and correct across the codebase.
pkg/crypto/protocol/hasher.go:RelayHasherSizeis defined assha256.Size.- Consistent usage in
x/service/types/relay.go,x/tokenomics/module/abci.go,x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof.go, and other related files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of `protocol.RelayHasherSize` in `RelayResponse`. # Test: Search for the variable usage. Expect: Proper definition and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'RelayHasherSize'Length of output: 6589
x/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param_test.go (4)
19-19: Ensure proper decoding ofexpectedRelayDifficultyTargetHash.The variable
expectedRelayDifficultyTargetHashis decoded from a hexadecimal string. Ensure that the decoding is correct and consistent with the expected hash.Verification successful
The decoding of
expectedRelayDifficultyTargetHashis correct and consistently used.
- The variable is properly decoded from the hexadecimal string.
- It is used to verify the relay difficulty target hash before and after the update.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the decoding of `expectedRelayDifficultyTargetHash`. # Test: Search for the variable usage. Expect: Proper decoding and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'expectedRelayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 2331
38-39: Ensure proper validation of updated parameters.The test case validates the updated relay difficulty target hash. Ensure that the validation is properly handled and consistent with the expected hash.
Verification successful
Proper validation of updated parameters is ensured.
The validation of the
RelayDifficultyTargetHashparameter is properly handled in the codebase. The test case verifies that the updated relay difficulty target hash matches the expected value, and the validation logic is correctly implemented in the code.
- The function
types.ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHashis used to validate theRelayDifficultyTargetHash.- The implementation of
ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHashinx/proof/types/params.goperforms the necessary validation checks.- Multiple test cases confirm the validation logic.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the validation of updated parameters. # Test: Search for the validation usage. Expect: Proper handling and validation. rg --type go -A 5 $'RelayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 27661
32-33: Ensure proper update of relay difficulty target hash.The test case updates the relay difficulty target hash. Ensure that the update is properly handled and validated.
Verification successful
Ensure proper update of relay difficulty target hash.
The update of the relay difficulty target hash is properly handled and validated in the following locations:
- Parameter Definition:
x/proof/types/params.go- Handling in UpdateParam Method:
x/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param.go- Test Cases:
x/proof/keeper/msg_server_update_param_test.gox/proof/types/message_update_param_test.goThese locations confirm that the parameter is correctly defined, handled, and validated through various test scenarios.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the update of relay difficulty target hash. # Test: Search for the update parameter usage. Expect: Proper handling and validation. rg --type go -A 5 $'ParamRelayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 4203
27-27: Ensure proper validation of default parameters.The test case ensures that the default relay difficulty target hash is different from the expected hash. Ensure that the default parameters are properly validated.
Verification successful
Proper validation of default parameters is ensured.
The
DefaultParamsfunction and corresponding validation functions across different modules confirm that default parameters are validated correctly.
- Various
DefaultParamsfunctions are defined in multiple modules.- Validation functions for specific parameters are present and ensure the validity of default parameters.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the validation of default parameters. # Test: Search for the default parameter usage. Expect: Proper validation. rg --type go -A 5 $'DefaultParams'Length of output: 85665
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather more specific information about the definition and usage of DefaultParams function. # Search for the definition of DefaultParams function in Go files. rg --type go 'func DefaultParams()' # Search for validation functions related to parameters. rg --type go 'func Validate' -A 5Length of output: 5551
telemetry/event_counters.go (1)
150-161: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
RelayMiningDifficultyGaugematch the new signature.Verification successful
Function usage verified successfully.
All function calls to
RelayMiningDifficultyGaugematch the new signature.
x/tokenomics/module/abci.go:telemetry.RelayMiningDifficultyGauge(difficulty, serviceId)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RelayMiningDifficultyGauge` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'RelayMiningDifficultyGauge'Length of output: 1028
x/proof/types/params.go (6)
20-21: LGTM!The changes are straightforward and correctly replace
KeyMinRelayDifficultyBitswithKeyRelayDifficultyTargetHash.
22-22: LGTM!The changes are straightforward and correctly introduce
DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashwith a default value derived from a hexadecimal string.
44-50: LGTM!The changes are straightforward and correctly update the
NewParamsfunction to acceptrelayDifficultyTargetHashinstead ofminRelayDifficultyBits.
60-60: LGTM!The changes are straightforward and correctly update the
DefaultParamsfunction to return the new default forRelayDifficultyTargetHash.
71-73: LGTM!The changes are straightforward and correctly update the
ParamSetPairsfunction to include the new parameterRelayDifficultyTargetHashand its corresponding validation function.
117-131: LGTM!The changes are straightforward and correctly introduce the
ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHashfunction to replaceValidateMinRelayDifficultyBits.e2e/tests/update_params.feature (2)
40-44: LGTM!The changes are straightforward and correctly update the test scenario to replace
min_relay_difficulty_bitswithrelay_difficulty_target_hash.
92-93: LGTM!The changes are straightforward and correctly update the test scenario to replace
min_relay_difficulty_bitswithproof_request_probability.testutil/testrelayer/relays.go (2)
114-114: Verify the correctness of the new hashing method.The hash computation logic has been updated to use
protocol.GetRelayHashFromBytes. Ensure this new method is correctly implemented and tested.
60-60: Verify the correctness of the new hashing method.The hash computation logic has been updated to use
protocol.GetRelayHashFromBytes. Ensure this new method is correctly implemented and tested.x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty.go (5)
34-34: LGTM! Enhanced precision for smoothing factor.The change to use
math/bigforemaSmoothingFactorenhances the precision of the smoothing factor calculation.
60-60: LGTM! Improved accuracy for relay mining difficulty calculations.The changes to use precision arithmetic for EMA calculations and relay mining difficulty updates enhance the accuracy and adaptability of the calculations.
122-142: LGTM! Dynamic approach for difficulty target calculation.The changes to accept a
prevTargetHashparameter and use precision arithmetic improve the dynamic approach to setting the difficulty target based on actual relay performance.
145-174: LGTM! New function for scaling difficulty target hash.The new function
scaleDifficultyTargetHashensures the scaled target hash maintains the correct length and does not exceed predefined limits.
183-190: LGTM! Improved accuracy for EMA calculations.The changes to use precision arithmetic for EMA calculations enhance the accuracy of the calculations.
tests/integration/tokenomics/relay_mining_difficulty_test.go (1)
122-123: LGTM! Improved maintainability of test assertions.The changes to use
prooftypes.DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashHexinstead of hardcoded hexadecimal string values improve the maintainability and clarity of the test.However, ensure that
prooftypes.DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashHexis correctly defined and accessible.Tools
GitHub Check: go-test
[failure] 122-122:
undefined: prooftypes.DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashHex
[failure] 123-123:
undefined: prooftypes.DefaultRelayDifficultyTargetHashHex (typecheck)x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty_test.go (4)
146-157: Refined assertions for target hash comparison.The assertions have been refined to explicitly check if the new relay difficulty's target hash is less than or equal to the expected target hash. This change improves clarity and correctness.
164-167: Renamed variables for clarity.The expected output variable has been renamed from
expectedDifficultyHashtoexpectedRelayDifficultyHash. This change enhances clarity and consistency across the test suite.
221-228: Refined assertions for target hash comparison.The assertions have been refined to explicitly check if the new relay difficulty's target hash is less than or equal to the expected target hash. This change improves clarity and correctness.
Line range hint
185-194:
Ensure consistent use of leading zero bits.The target hash is now set to ensure at least 8 leading zero bits. This change should be consistently applied across all relevant tests.
Verification successful
Verification successful: Consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash.
The target hash is consistently set to ensure at least 8 leading zero bits across the relevant tests.
- Instances found in
x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty_test.go:
[]byte{0b00000000}, // at least 8 leading 0 bitsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash across all tests. # Test: Search for the target hash initialization. Expect: Consistent use of leading zero bits. rg --type go -A 5 $'[]byte{0b00001111}'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash across all tests. # Test: Search for the target hash initialization. Expect: Consistent use of leading zero bits. rg --type go -A 5 '\[\]byte{0b00001111}'Length of output: 136
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash across all tests. # Test: Search for the target hash initialization. Expect: Consistent use of leading zero bits. rg --type go -A 5 '\[\]byte\{0b00001111\}'Length of output: 520
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of leading zero bits in target hash across all tests. # Test: Search for various target hash initializations with leading zero bits. for i in {0..15}; do rg --type go -A 5 "\[\]byte\{0b$(printf '%08d' $(echo "obase=2;$i" | bc))\}" doneLength of output: 10229
e2e/tests/parse_params_test.go (1)
136-137: Ensure correct decoding of hex string.The logic now decodes a hex string from the
paramValueand assigns it tomsgUpdateParams.Params.RelayDifficultyTargetHash. Ensure that the hex string is correctly decoded and assigned.Verification successful
Ensure correct decoding of hex string.
The logic decodes a hex string from
paramValueand assigns it tomsgUpdateParams.Params.RelayDifficultyTargetHash. The decoding appears correct, but ensure thatparamValue.valueis a valid byte slice and that tests validate this behavior.
e2e/tests/parse_params_test.goe2e/tests/update_params_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct decoding of hex string for RelayDifficultyTargetHash. # Test: Search for the hex decoding logic. Expect: Correct decoding and assignment. rg --type go -A 5 $'hex.DecodeString'Length of output: 8311
pkg/client/interface.go (1)
338-338: Updated method signature inProofParamsinterface.The method signature has been changed from
GetMinRelayDifficultyBitstoGetRelayDifficultyTargetHash, reflecting a shift from numeric representation to a byte array. Ensure that all implementations of this interface are updated accordingly.Verification successful
Updated method signature in
ProofParamsinterface verified.The method signature has been successfully updated from
GetMinRelayDifficultyBitstoGetRelayDifficultyTargetHash, and there are no remaining references to the old method.
api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.gox/proof/types/params.pb.gopkg/client/interface.gopkg/relayer/miner/miner.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all implementations of `ProofParams` interface are updated. # Test: Search for the implementations of `ProofParams` interface. Expect: Updated method signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetRelayDifficultyTargetHash'Length of output: 1297
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify no remaining references to the old method `GetMinRelayDifficultyBits`. # Test: Search for any occurrences of `GetMinRelayDifficultyBits`. Expect: No results. rg --type go $'GetMinRelayDifficultyBits'Length of output: 40
e2e/tests/update_params_test.go (1)
374-376: Ensure correct decoding ofrelayDifficultyTargetHash.The logic to decode
relayDifficultyTargetHashfrom a byte slice to a hexadecimal string looks correct. Verify that therelayDifficultyTargetHashis correctly encoded elsewhere in the codebase.x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof.go (3)
211-211: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
validateRelayDifficultymatch the new signature.Verification successful
Function usage verified.
The function
validateRelayDifficultyis only called within the same file where it is defined, and all instances match the new signature.
x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `validateRelayDifficulty` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go 'validateRelayDifficulty'Length of output: 407
207-211: Ensure correct retrieval of relay difficulty parameters.The TODO comment suggests a follow-up to get the difficulty associated with the service. Verify that the parameters are correctly retrieved and used in the validation.
Verification successful
Ensure correct retrieval of relay difficulty parameters.
The
GetParamsfunction inx/proof/keeper/params.gocorrectly retrieves and unmarshals the parameters from the store, ensuring that the relay difficulty parameters are correctly retrieved and used in the validation logic.
x/proof/keeper/params.go:
func (k Keeper) GetParams(ctx context.Context) (params types.Params)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct retrieval of relay difficulty parameters in the codebase. # Test: Search for the retrieval logic. Expect: Correct retrieval logic for relay difficulty parameters. rg --type go 'GetParams'Length of output: 16632
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and examine the GetParams function definition in x/proof/keeper/params.go. # Locate the GetParams function definition in the proof module. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (k Keeper) GetParams(ctx context.Context) (params types.Params) { $$$ }'Length of output: 4909
446-473: Ensure correct validation of relay difficulty.The new
validateRelayDifficultyfunction includes logic to handle relay hash and target hash validation. Verify the correctness of the logic and the error messages.Verification successful
Ensure correct validation of relay difficulty.
The
validateRelayDifficultyfunction correctly utilizes theprotocol.GetRelayHashFromBytesandprotocol.GetDifficultyFromHashfunctions. The logic and error handling in the function are consistent with the intended purpose of validating relay difficulty.
protocol.GetRelayHashFromBytescorrectly converts a byte slice to a fixed-size array using a hasher.protocol.GetDifficultyFromHashaccurately calculates the difficulty by dividing a base difficulty hash by the given hash.The validation logic and error messages in
validateRelayDifficultyare appropriately implemented.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the relay difficulty validation logic. # Test: Search for the usage of `protocol.GetRelayHashFromBytes` and `protocol.GetDifficultyFromHash`. Expect: Correct usage in the validation logic. rg --type go 'protocol.GetRelayHashFromBytes|protocol.GetDifficultyFromHash'Length of output: 1310
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of `protocol.GetRelayHashFromBytes` and `protocol.GetDifficultyFromHash` to verify their correctness. # Search for the implementation of `GetRelayHashFromBytes` function in the protocol package. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func GetRelayHashFromBytes($_) $_' # Search for the implementation of `GetDifficultyFromHash` function in the protocol package. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func GetDifficultyFromHash($_) $_'Length of output: 1350
api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go (10)
189-191: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashinGetmethod.The updated
Getmethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the method is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.
Line range hint
476-508: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashin unmarshal logic.The updated unmarshal logic correctly handles
relay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the logic is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.
Line range hint
629-672: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashinParamsstructure.The updated
Paramsstructure correctly includesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the structure is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.
165-166: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashinClearmethod.The updated
Clearmethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the method is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.
254-255: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashinMutablemethod.The updated
Mutablemethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the method is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.
21-31: Ensure correct field descriptors forParams.The updated field descriptors for
relay_difficulty_target_hashlook correct. Verify that the descriptors are correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.Verification successful
Let's review the context around the usage of
fd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hashto confirm its correctness. Specifically, we need to check the conditional statement to ensure it is used appropriately.
Field descriptor
fd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hashis correctly used.The field descriptor
fd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hashis correctly defined, initialized, and used within theRangefunction offastReflection_Paramsto handle theRelayDifficultyTargetHashfield.
api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go: Correctly defines and initializesfd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hash.api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go: Correctly usesfd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hashwithin theRangefunction.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of field descriptors for `Params` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `fd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hash`. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'fd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hash'Length of output: 387
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract surrounding lines to understand the context of `fd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hash` usage. # Extracting lines around the usage of `fd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hash` to understand the context. rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'fd_Params_relay_difficulty_target_hash'Length of output: 2613
141-142: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashinHasmethod.The updated
Hasmethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the method is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful for handling
relay_difficulty_target_hashinHasmethod.The
Hasmethod inapi/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.gocorrectly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. No issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of the `Has` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Has` method. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'Has'Length of output: 121676
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of the `Has` method specifically in `api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go`. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Has` method in `api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go`. rg --type go 'Has' api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.goLength of output: 1426
273-274: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashinNewFieldmethod.The updated
NewFieldmethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the method is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure correct handling of
relay_difficulty_target_hashinNewFieldmethod.The updated
NewFieldmethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the method is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.
The
NewFieldmethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hashinapi/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go.
- The method implementation includes a switch case for
poktroll.proof.Params.relay_difficulty_target_hashand returnsprotoreflect.ValueOfBytes(nil), which is consistent with the handling of other fields.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of the `NewField` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `NewField` method. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'NewField'Length of output: 35240
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `NewField` method in `api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go`. # Test: Extract the implementation of the `NewField` method in `api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (x *fastReflection_Params) NewField(fd protoreflect.FieldDescriptor) protoreflect.Value { $$$ }' api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.goLength of output: 1690
Line range hint
351-424: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashinProtoMethods.The updated
ProtoMethodscorrectly handlerelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the methods are correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.Verification successful
To verify the correct handling of
relay_difficulty_target_hashinProtoMethods, we need to inspect the implementation inapi/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.goand compare it with similar implementations in other files.
Handling of
relay_difficulty_target_hashinProtoMethodsis correct and consistent.The implementation in
api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.gocorrectly calculates the size of therelay_difficulty_target_hashfield and adds it to the total size, consistent with otherProtoMethodsimplementations.
api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go: Correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hashinProtoMethods.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of `ProtoMethods` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `ProtoMethods`. Expect: Correct usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'ProtoMethods'Length of output: 36531
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct handling of `relay_difficulty_target_hash` in `ProtoMethods`. # Search for the implementation of `ProtoMethods` in the specified file. rg --type go 'ProtoMethods' -A 20 api/poktroll/proof/params.pulsar.go # Search for the implementation of `ProtoMethods` in other relevant files for comparison. rg --type go 'ProtoMethods' -A 20 api/poktroll/tokenomics/query.pulsar.go rg --type go 'ProtoMethods' -A 20 api/poktroll/shared/params.pulsar.goLength of output: 7595
102-104: Ensure correct handling ofrelay_difficulty_target_hashinRangemethod.The updated
Rangemethod correctly handlesrelay_difficulty_target_hash. Verify that the method is correctly used elsewhere in the codebase.x/proof/keeper/msg_server_submit_proof_test.go (5)
5-5: Note the addition of theencoding/heximport.The
encoding/hexpackage is used for encoding and decoding hexadecimal strings, indicating that such operations are now required in the tests.
48-52: Update totestProofParamsinitialization.The
MinRelayDifficultyBitshas been replaced withRelayDifficultyTargetHash, shifting the focus from a bit-based difficulty representation to a hash-based one. This aligns with the new logic for relay difficulty.
569-573: Addition oflowTargetHashandhighExpectedTargetDifficulty.The
lowTargetHashis decoded from a hexadecimal string, andhighExpectedTargetDifficultyis computed usingprotocol.GetDifficultyFromHash. These variables are used to set and compute the relay difficulty target hash for the tests.
Line range hint
1028-1052:
Modification of test case to setRelayDifficultyTargetHashand validate relay difficulty.The test case now sets the
RelayDifficultyTargetHashtolowTargetHashand validates that the relay difficulty is greater than or equal to the target difficulty. This ensures that the new hash-based difficulty logic is correctly tested.
Line range hint
1409-1431:
Renaming and modification ofgetClosestRelayDifficultyBitstogetClosestRelayDifficulty.The function now returns an
int64instead of auint64and usesprotocol.GetDifficultyFromHashto compute the difficulty from the relay hash. This aligns with the new hash-based difficulty logic.
Comments failed to post (5)
proto/poktroll/proof/params.proto
15-15: Reminder: Follow-up task for renaming the field.
The TODO comment indicates a follow-up task regarding the naming of the new field
relay_difficulty_target_hash.Do you want me to open a GitHub issue to track this task?
x/tokenomics/keeper/scale_difficulty_test.go
16-16: Reminder: Follow up on the TODO comment.
The TODO comment indicates a need to ensure that the ratio corresponds to the probability of a relay being accepted. This should be addressed or explained.
Do you want me to help address this TODO or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
86-100: Improve the test structure for better readability.
The test structure can be improved by separating the setup, execution, and verification phases more clearly.
for _, test := range tests { t.Run(test.desc, func(t *testing.T) { // Setup targetHashBz, targetErr := hex.DecodeString(test.targetHashHex) require.NoError(t, targetErr) expectedHashBz, expectedErr := hex.DecodeString(test.expectedHashHex) require.NoError(t, expectedErr) // Execution scaledDifficultyHash := scaleDifficultyTargetHash(targetHashBz, new(big.Float).SetFloat64(test.ratio)) // Verification assert.Equal(t, len(scaledDifficultyHash), len(targetHashBz)) require.Zero(t, bytes.Compare(expectedHashBz, scaledDifficultyHash), "expected difficulty hash %x, but got %x", expectedHashBz, scaledDifficultyHash) }) }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for _, test := range tests { t.Run(test.desc, func(t *testing.T) { // Setup targetHashBz, targetErr := hex.DecodeString(test.targetHashHex) require.NoError(t, targetErr) expectedHashBz, expectedErr := hex.DecodeString(test.expectedHashHex) require.NoError(t, expectedErr) // Execution scaledDifficultyHash := scaleDifficultyTargetHash(targetHashBz, new(big.Float).SetFloat64(test.ratio)) // Verification assert.Equal(t, len(scaledDifficultyHash), len(targetHashBz)) require.Zero(t, bytes.Compare(expectedHashBz, scaledDifficultyHash), "expected difficulty hash %x, but got %x", expectedHashBz, scaledDifficultyHash) }) }x/proof/keeper/params_test.go
23-25: Update function name to reflect new parameter.
The function name
TestParams_ValidateMinRelayDifficultyshould be updated to reflect the new parameterrelayDifficultyTargetHash.- func TestParams_ValidateMinRelayDifficulty(t *testing.T) { + func TestParams_ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash(t *testing.T) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.- func TestParams_ValidateMinRelayDifficulty(t *testing.T) { + func TestParams_ValidateRelayDifficultyTargetHash(t *testing.T) {
28-30: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for invalid types.
The test case for the invalid type should cover more scenarios, such as other invalid types besides
int64.{ desc: "invalid type (int64)", relayDifficultyTargetHash: int64(-1), expectedErr: prooftypes.ErrProofParamInvalid.Wrapf("invalid parameter type: int64"), }, { desc: "invalid type (string)", relayDifficultyTargetHash: "invalid", expectedErr: prooftypes.ErrProofParamInvalid.Wrapf("invalid parameter type: string"), },Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.desc: "invalid type", relayDifficultyTargetHash: int64(-1), expectedErr: prooftypes.ErrProofParamInvalid.Wrapf("invalid parameter type: int64"), }, { desc: "invalid type (string)", relayDifficultyTargetHash: "invalid", expectedErr: prooftypes.ErrProofParamInvalid.Wrapf("invalid parameter type: string"),
|
@bryanchriswhite @red-0ne Just FYI. Going to merge this in so we can get #690 over the finish line. |
Co-authored-by: Bryan White <[email protected]>
| @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ message Params { | |||
| option (amino.name) = "poktroll/x/proof/Params"; | |||
| option (gogoproto.equal) = true; | |||
|
|
|||
| // TODO_FOLLOWUP(@olshansk, #690): Either delete this or change it to be named "minimum" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you explain why this can be deleted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see now. Could this be a map of serviceId to difficulty target hash (string->bytes)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's what the RelayMiningDifficulty on-chain type already is. See /Users/olshansky/workspace/pocket/poktroll3/x/tokenomics/keeper/update_relay_mining_difficulty.go.
type RelayMiningDifficulty struct {
ServiceId string `protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=service_id,json=serviceId,proto3" json:"service_id,omitempty"`
BlockHeight int64 `protobuf:"varint,2,opt,name=block_height,json=blockHeight,proto3" json:"block_height,omitempty"`
NumRelaysEma uint64 `protobuf:"varint,3,opt,name=num_relays_ema,json=numRelaysEma,proto3" json:"num_relays_ema,omitempty"`
TargetHash []byte `protobuf:"bytes,4,opt,name=target_hash,json=targetHash,proto3" json:"target_hash,omitempty"`
}The baseline is just fffff.
Having an on-chain parameter for just extra overhead and context.
| @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ func (k Keeper) SettlePendingClaims(ctx sdk.Context) ( | |||
| expiredResult.NumComputeUnits += numClaimComputeUnits | |||
| continue | |||
| } | |||
| // TODO_FOLLOWUP(@olshansk, #690): Document the potential changes needed here. | |||
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests