Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add synacktiv/action-octoscan #86

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

Add synacktiv/action-octoscan #86

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

pandatix
Copy link
Owner

In order to test synacktiv/action-octoscan, I add the action (see synacktiv/octoscan#8) 😉
It runs instantaneously on a small repository and validate without false positives.

Poke @hugo-syn

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@pandatix
Copy link
Owner Author

It provides good insights on problems from the sarif results.
image

No possible injections, data is the result of sha256sum
@pandatix
Copy link
Owner Author

Cannot have a review from another maintainer as the sole one, have to bypass branch protection.

@pandatix pandatix merged commit 4c0210f into main Oct 28, 2024
17 checks passed
@pandatix pandatix deleted the ci/octoscan branch October 28, 2024 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant