Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added number validation on interval input field (#7411) #7445

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

ClementBouvierN
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request focus on the settings.component.html and settings.component.ts files within the settings module of the application. In settings.component.html, the input handling for the replayInterval field has been modified. The input element now includes a template reference variable named #replayIntervalValue and an inputmode attribute set to numeric. The event handling for input has transitioned from using an inline oninput attribute to an Angular event binding (input), which invokes a new method called validateNumericInput(replayIntervalValue).

In the corresponding TypeScript file, settings.component.ts, a new private method named validateNumericInput has been added to the SettingsComponent class. This method is designed to modify the value of the input element by removing any non-digit characters using a regular expression. The method is not currently invoked, indicating it may be intended for future use in validating numeric inputs. Overall, the modifications primarily focus on enhancing the input validation for the replayInterval field without altering the overall structure or functionality of the settings component.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.html (1)

69-70: LGTM! Consider adding accessibility attributes.

The implementation correctly prevents non-numerical input through multiple approaches (type="number", inputmode="numeric"). Consider adding an aria-label for better accessibility:

 <input id="opfab-setting-input-replayInterval" #replayIntervalValue type="number" min="0" formControlName="replayInterval" inputmode="numeric"
-       (input)="numericalInputChecker(replayIntervalValue)">
+       (input)="numericalInputChecker(replayIntervalValue)"
+       aria-label="Replay interval in seconds">
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c163f28 and 02d0c42.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.html (1 hunks)
  • ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.ts

[error] 145-145: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.

See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.

(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)

Comment on lines 143 to 148
private numericalInputChecker(inputElement: HTMLInputElement) {
const numericValue = parseFloat(inputElement.value);
if (isNaN(numericValue) || numericValue < 0) {
inputElement.value = '';
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Security and UX improvements needed in numerical validation.

The current implementation has several areas for improvement:

  1. Uses unsafe isNaN which attempts type coercion
  2. Silently clears invalid input without user feedback
  3. Missing validation for edge cases

Consider this enhanced implementation:

- private numericalInputChecker(inputElement: HTMLInputElement) {
-     const numericValue = parseFloat(inputElement.value);
-     if (isNaN(numericValue) || numericValue < 0) {
-         inputElement.value = '';
-     }
- } 
+ private numericalInputChecker(inputElement: HTMLInputElement) {
+     const value = inputElement.value.trim();
+     if (value === '') return;
+     
+     const numericValue = parseFloat(value);
+     if (Number.isNaN(numericValue) || numericValue < 0) {
+         inputElement.value = '';
+         AlertMessageService.sendAlertMessage({
+             message: '',
+             i18n: {key: 'settings.input.errors.invalidNumber'},
+             level: MessageLevel.ERROR
+         });
+     }
+ }

Also, consider adding these translations to your i18n files:

{
  "settings.input.errors.invalidNumber": "Please enter a valid positive number"
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 145-145: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.

See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.

(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)


💡 Codebase verification

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

The numerical validation approach needs improvement

The current implementation shows that:

  • The form is using Angular's Reactive Forms (FormGroup and FormControl)
  • The replayInterval field is using a direct DOM manipulation approach for validation via numericalInputChecker
  • While the input has formControlName="replayInterval", it's missing proper form validators

To improve this:

  1. Remove the numericalInputChecker method and (input) event handler
  2. Add proper form validators to the replayInterval control during form initialization:
replayInterval: new FormControl('', [
  Validators.required,
  Validators.min(0),
  Validators.pattern(/^\d+$/)
])
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify integration with form validation.

The numerical validation should be integrated with Angular's form validation system for consistency.

Let's check the form validation setup:

Consider enhancing the validation by:

  1. Adding a custom validator to the form control
  2. Using reactive form validation instead of DOM event handling
  3. Implementing proper form state management

Example implementation:

private createNumberValidator(): ValidatorFn {
  return (control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null => {
    const value = control.value;
    if (value === null || value === '') return null;
    const numeric = parseFloat(value);
    return Number.isNaN(numeric) || numeric < 0 ? {invalidNumber: true} : null;
  };
}

Let me gather more information about the specific component to understand how the numerical validation is currently implemented.


Let me check how this numerical input checker is being used in the component.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for form validation patterns in the codebase
rg -A 5 "Validators\." "ui/main/src/app/modules/"

Length of output: 12423


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the form setup and validation in the settings component
rg -A 10 "settingsForm" "ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.ts"

# Search for any numerical input handling in the settings component
rg -B 5 -A 10 "numericalInputChecker" "ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.ts"

Length of output: 2529


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of numericalInputChecker in the template or component
rg -B 5 -A 5 "numericalInputChecker" "ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.html"

# Search for numeric-related form controls in the settings component
rg -B 2 -A 2 "type=\"number\"" "ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.html"

Length of output: 1125

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 145-145: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.

See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.

(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)

@ClementBouvierN ClementBouvierN force-pushed the FE-7411-stringInIntervalBetweenSound branch from 02d0c42 to b4a713c Compare October 24, 2024 12:49
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02d0c42 and b4a713c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.html (1 hunks)
  • ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.html
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.ts

[error] 145-145: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.

See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.

(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)

Comment on lines 143 to 145
private numericalInputChecker(inputElement: HTMLInputElement) {
const numericValue = parseFloat(inputElement.value);
if (isNaN(numericValue) || numericValue < 0) {
inputElement.value = '';
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Additional concerns with the numerical validation implementation.

While previous reviews covered the main validation issues, there are additional concerns:

  1. Direct DOM manipulation via inputElement.value = '' breaks Angular's change detection and form state management
  2. The validation is not integrated with the existing form validation setup in initForm()
  3. The empty string values from cleared inputs may affect the form value changes subscription in listenToFormChanges()

Consider integrating the validation with the existing form setup:

private initForm() {
  // ... existing code ...
  
  const formGroupConfig = {};
  settings.forEach((setting) => {
    if (setting === 'email') {
      formGroupConfig[setting] = new FormControl(this.settingsView.getSetting(setting), Validators.email);
    } else if (setting === 'replayInterval') {
      formGroupConfig[setting] = new FormControl(
        this.settingsView.getSetting(setting),
        [
          Validators.required,
          Validators.min(0),
          Validators.pattern(/^\d*\.?\d*$/)
        ]
      );
    } else {
      formGroupConfig[setting] = new FormControl(this.settingsView.getSetting(setting));
    }
  });
}

This approach:

  • Properly integrates with Angular's form validation
  • Maintains form state for error handling
  • Preserves change detection
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 145-145: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.

See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.

(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)

@ClementBouvierN ClementBouvierN force-pushed the FE-7411-stringInIntervalBetweenSound branch from b4a713c to 67193d4 Compare October 24, 2024 15:06
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4a713c and 67193d4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.html (1 hunks)
  • ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • ui/main/src/app/modules/settings/components/settings/settings.component.html

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 24, 2024

@freddidierRTE freddidierRTE merged commit f17bc0d into develop Oct 24, 2024
9 checks passed
@freddidierRTE freddidierRTE deleted the FE-7411-stringInIntervalBetweenSound branch October 24, 2024 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

It should not be possible to set string in "Interval between sound" in settings
2 participants