-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[dbus] add retain_active_session
option for deactivate API
#2537
Conversation
76cce5f
to
02d8a96
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2537 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 55.77% 45.51% -10.26%
===========================================
Files 87 102 +15
Lines 6890 12197 +5307
Branches 0 894 +894
===========================================
+ Hits 3843 5552 +1709
- Misses 3047 6343 +3296
- Partials 0 302 +302 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
02d8a96
to
23aaa01
Compare
Should disconnect be the default behavior? Perhaps adding an option "retain-active-session"? |
+1 |
23aaa01
to
d3a0c35
Compare
Change |
d3a0c35
to
a263f5c
Compare
force
option for deactivate APIretain_active_session
option for deactivate API
a263f5c
to
9d412f1
Compare
missing test? |
Test is in openthread branch, and it seems no depends-on support on otbr (only ot have depends-on of otbr). |
64e4fee
to
7b9b2c0
Compare
49ab85b
to
dda477d
Compare
dda477d
to
75996fa
Compare
6b6f51d
to
eb589c2
Compare
eb589c2
to
e4b54a2
Compare
The CI failure of this PR is due to Dbus API new option added, but the original unit test in OT has not added the new option. The CI failure should be clear after PR |
4dd0b13
to
fd41cd1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
One small suggestion: it would be great to write PR description. Probably with a one-sentence summary and some explanation about the background,
No description provided.