OPRUN-3576: Add OLMv1 origin tests

[tmshort]

This is the initial test. Only works on tech-preview. Checks for presence of OLMv1 CRDs.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@tmshort: This pull request references OPRUN-3576 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

This is the initial test. Only works on tech-preview. Checks for presence of OLMv1 CRDs.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tmshort
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign neisw for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tmshort]

/retest

[tmshort]

/retest

[tmshort]

Since you were lucky enough to be randomly chosen by github... @deads2k @mike-nguyen, my tests only do something under tech-preview (until OLMv1 is out of tech preview), but a number prow jobs seem to be failing? Is this normal? How do I get this PR to progress?

[LalatenduMohanty]

@wking @petr-muller are my go to origin test experts. Can you guys take a look?

[openshift-ci]

@tmshort: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-ipsec-serial	f15e4ed	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-ipsec-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-trt-bot]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: f15e4ed

Job Name

Failure Risk

pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn

High [sig-api-machinery] disruption/cache-kube-api connection/new should be available throughout the test This test has passed 99.77% of 5687 runs on release 4.18 [Overall] in the last week. --- [sig-api-machinery] disruption/openshift-api connection/new should be available throughout the test This test has passed 99.86% of 5687 runs on release 4.18 [Overall] in the last week. --- [sig-api-machinery] disruption/kube-api connection/new should be available throughout the test This test has passed 99.75% of 5687 runs on release 4.18 [Overall] in the last week. --- [sig-api-machinery] disruption/cache-oauth-api connection/new should be available throughout the test This test has passed 99.86% of 5687 runs on release 4.18 [Overall] in the last week.

[tmshort]

/retest

[dgoodwin]

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-ipsec-serial

Known broken.

[openshift-ci]

@dgoodwin: Overrode contexts on behalf of dgoodwin: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-ipsec-serial

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-ipsec-serial

Known broken.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[joelanford]

Seems like a reasonable foray into OLMv1 origin tests, but I do wonder if this will really stand the test of time.

I would somewhat assume that this would be quickly obviated by origin tests that actually exercise the APIs that we expect to exist.

[joelanford]

nit: to avoid having to use escaped quotation marks

Suggested change

	raw, err = oc.AsAdmin().Run("get").Args("crds", fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", api.plural, api.group), fmt.Sprintf("-o=jsonpath={.spec.versions[?(@.name==\"%s\")]}", ver)).Output()
	raw, err = oc.AsAdmin().Run("get").Args("crds", fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", api.plural, api.group), fmt.Sprintf(`-o=jsonpath={.spec.versions[?(@.name==%q)]}`, ver)).Output()