staging contract CLI

[ianthpun]

Closes #1387 #1386 #1397 #1398 #1399

Description

create function commands for
getStagedCode
isStaged
listStagedContracts
StageContract
UnstageContract

include unit tests for each to test working behavior

---

For contributor use:

• Targeted PR against master branch
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work
• Code follows the standards mentioned here
• Updated relevant documentation
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
• Added appropriate labels

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 54 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (752eb7b) 40.60% compared to head (becb0d2) 41.87%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on feature/stable-cadence.

Files	Patch %	Lines
internal/migrate/migrate.go	60.00%	10 Missing and 8 partials ⚠️
internal/migrate/stage_contract.go	64.28%	5 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
internal/migrate/get_staged_code.go	68.42%	3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
internal/migrate/is_staged.go	68.42%	3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
internal/migrate/unstage_contract.go	68.42%	3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
internal/migrate/list_staged_contracts.go	75.00%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
internal/transactions/transactions.go	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
internal/scripts/scripts.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                     @@
##           feature/stable-cadence    #1393      +/-   ##
==========================================================
+ Coverage                   40.60%   41.87%   +1.27%     
==========================================================
  Files                          47       53       +6     
  Lines                        2596     2746     +150     
==========================================================
+ Hits                         1054     1150      +96     
- Misses                       1417     1447      +30     
- Partials                      125      149      +24     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	41.87% <64.00%> (+1.27%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ianthpun]

works for me, i'll get those moved over and have you take a look at it. Originally we considered having it there in the first place but due to time i just had it in the CLI. But i can get something out for it by EOD

[bjartek]

I am heading afk for a week. So if you are on the clock just leave it.

[ianthpun]

@bthaile @bjartek I've created onflow/flowkit#13 which would move those methods over there. Let me know what you think, if it looks good i can merge, release, and have this package use it

[sisyphusSmiling]

Testing commands against Testnet LGTM, great work!

fixed bjarteks issues, but he is gone for the week. The helper funcs are addressed inside flowkit/v2 but currently have dependency issues, will come back to this after

[jribbink]

Looks great! Have some nits mostly arround improving some of the test coverage.

[jribbink]

imo we should be asserting that ExecuteScript was called with the correct CDC script