Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CS2103-F13-1] SpleetWaise #1

Open
wants to merge 651 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SeeYangZhi
Copy link

SpleetWaise simplifies expense tracking for students, making it easy to split and manage shared costs. By offering a seamless solution to track who owes what, it eliminates the stress and confusion that often come with shared expenses, ensuring clarity and peace of mind for students who use SpleetWaise.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 8, 2024

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

ℹ️ You can also turn on project coverage checks and project coverage reporting on Pull Request comment

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

juliantayyc added a commit to juliantayyc/tp that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
…switch-docs-to-markbind

Switch docs to markbind
Judy1x4 pushed a commit to Judy1x4/tp that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
rollingpencil and others added 27 commits November 4, 2024 19:40
…tions

Abstract ive and data loading exception
Change FilterCommandParser to accept index instead of phone number
This PR introduces changes to the Developer Guide documentation.
Adding details on addTxn for manual testing
Mentioned how Categories added will be capitalised automatically
SeeYangZhi and others added 30 commits November 7, 2024 17:07
Testing code needed for
CategoryFilterPredicate
Methods added in FilterCommand and Parser to support category filtering
…d-empty-txnlist

Add `clear` command should empty transaction book
Remove status and category for equality check
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants