-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Making RQC generator output compatible with qFlex input. #98
Comments
See #101. |
Is this still an issue? |
It is still an issue. I have few workaround that could be potentially implemented, but it would be better if the rqc generator would output the circuit using the same indexes for qubits that qflex actually uses. |
What is the current qubit indexing scheme in qflex? I recall there had been plans to change it... |
qflex uses the provided grid to number the qubits. For instance, for the IBM rochester, the grid can be found in |
I have a recollection of us deciding (or at least considering) to use contiguous indices for consistency with qsim. Do we still intend to do that? If so, then instead of changing the RQC generator, I can change qflex to use contiguous indices in the input files. |
At the moment, qflex is compatible with cirq (which doesn’t use contiguous indexes) so I would keep the compatibility with cirq rather than with qsim. In my opinion, I would prefer to add a flag to the rqc to either output the circuit using contiguous indexes or following a specific grid. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: