Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add FAQ to explain duplicate Circular records over Kafka #2654

Merged

Conversation

lpsinger
Copy link
Member

Explain why duplicate GCN Circular records occur on the gcn.circulars Kafka topic in normal operation.

There are still abnormal duplicates that are currently occurring due to some errors in ADS' records for GCN Circulars.

See #2639.

Explain why duplicate GCN Circular records occur on the
`gcn.circulars` Kafka topic in normal operation.

There are still _abnormal_ duplicates that are currently occurring
due to some errors in ADS' records for GCN Circulars.

See nasa-gcn#2639.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 6.22%. Comparing base (7321140) to head (10fa713).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #2654   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   6.22%   6.22%           
=====================================
  Files        167     167           
  Lines       4225    4225           
  Branches     467     467           
=====================================
  Hits         263     263           
  Misses      3960    3960           
  Partials       2       2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dakota002 dakota002 merged commit 6cb6221 into nasa-gcn:main Oct 30, 2024
12 checks passed
@lpsinger lpsinger deleted the faq-duplicate-circulars-records-over-kafka branch October 31, 2024 02:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants