Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Add slack and new publication info to readme (#78)
## Describe your changes This PR just contains some updates and clarifications to the readme. In particular: 1. Restructure references to publications as its own section in readme 2. Add reference to new, extended publication with links to branches where corresponding code can be found 3. Add links to join slack channel 4. Clarify state of ongoing work with making repo area-agnostic 5. Update text about Lightning issue with multi-gpu eval ## Type of change - [ ] 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue) - [ ] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality) - [ ] 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [x] 📖 Documentation (Addition or improvements to documentation) ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] My branch is up-to-date with the target branch - if not update your fork with the changes from the target branch (use `pull` with `--rebase` option if possible). - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] For any new/modified functions/classes I have added docstrings that clearly describe its purpose, expected inputs and returned values - [ ] I have placed in-line comments to clarify the intent of any hard-to-understand passages of my code - [x] I have updated the [README](README.MD) to cover introduced code changes - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] I have given the PR a name that clearly describes the change, written in imperative form ([context](https://www.gitkraken.com/learn/git/best-practices/git-commit-message#using-imperative-verb-form)). - [x] I have requested a reviewer and an assignee (assignee is responsible for merging). This applies only if you have write access to the repo, otherwise feel free to tag a maintainer to add a reviewer and assignee. ## Checklist for reviewers Each PR comes with its own improvements and flaws. The reviewer should check the following: - [x] the code is readable - [x] the code is well tested - [x] the code is documented (including return types and parameters) - [x] the code is easy to maintain ## Author checklist after completed review - [x] I have added a line to the CHANGELOG describing this change, in a section reflecting type of change (add section where missing): - *added*: when you have added new functionality - *changed*: when default behaviour of the code has been changed - *fixes*: when your contribution fixes a bug ## Checklist for assignee - [x] PR is up to date with the base branch - [x] the tests pass - [x] author has added an entry to the changelog (and designated the change as *added*, *changed* or *fixed*) - Once the PR is ready to be merged, squash commits and merge the PR.
- Loading branch information