Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

595 improved layer upgrade UI workflow #614

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

adpare
Copy link
Contributor

@adpare adpare commented Feb 15, 2024

This PR addresses #595.

Copy link
Contributor

@clemiller clemiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a good start towards improving the usability of the layer upgrade interface. I've noticed a few areas that could benefit from some minor adjustments, and I have a few recommendations which could further improve the UX to be more intuitive and user-friendly.

  • There are some errors being thrown when the layer upgrade UI is loaded:

image

  • The "review all" button marks all techniques as reviewed and also automatically progresses to the next step which might be a bit confusing as its dual function isn't immediately intuitive; it would be more user-friendly if this was adjusted to only alter the "reviewed" status of techniques in the current step.

  • Placing the new buttons at the bottom of the wizard panel is a bit confusing as they are not related to the navigation between the layer upgrade steps, but rather changing the display of the current step. I would expect to find only navigation-related buttons at the bottom and any buttons/options related to the current steps above the technique panels.

  • I recommend changing the "review all" and "expand all" buttons to checkboxes, allowing users to easily toggle between reviewing/expanding all techniques and un-reviewing/collapsing them.

  • The current labels "review all" and "expand all" could be confusing as they both use the term "all" but have different scopes of action -"review all" affects all techniques in the step, while "expand all" only affects techniques on the current page of the paginated table. I'd recommend renaming to "mark all as reviewed" and "expand visible techniques" to clarify their functions.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 26, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link
Contributor

@clemiller clemiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@clemiller clemiller merged commit d7d4155 into develop Mar 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@clemiller clemiller deleted the 595-improved-layer-upgrade-ui-workflow branch March 8, 2024 18:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants