-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
countDominantTaxa output table #387
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
round could be an integer --> that would simplify the code
How about using digits as parameter name? round() has a parameter called that.
Also add input check for round parameter
We should use the same argument name than the |
up |
@himmil this PR has been open for a month; could we aim to close soon? |
This PR has been merged but it says above that "This branch is out-of-date with the base branch", and this PR also hasnt been closed. Can we do that as well, or is something else still missing? |
Apparently the testing file needs to be edited as well once the output table has changed. |
Yes, update all relevant files and complete the PR. Ask for support through Slack where necessary. |
Resolve the conversation issues when they become solved. This way we can remove points that have been successfully addressed. |
This branch is out-of-date with the base branch |
Thanks - one more request. Could you also deprecate the name You can check other deprecated functions for an example. The unit tests and vignette should be updated accordingly, after merging also the OMA examples. |
check how to complete.. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, check comments; just minor things
still on the way? |
For clarity, perhaps you can announce when this PR is ready for review. |
It's ready for review. |
ok - @TuomasBorman |
Hmm seems merging is blocked until @TuomasBorman approves too. (we could see if it is possible to remove the requirement of multiple approvals) |
I don't have write access so could you either merge it for me or give me the permission? |
No description provided.