Skip to content

code block execution for neorg (similar to org-eval)

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

laher/neorg-exec

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

57 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

NOTICE

This project has been cryogenically frozen (i.e. I'm not working on it) until I start actively using Neorg again. I appreciate the plugin's got broken features, and it's likely more broken than when I left it, because Neorg itself is changing.

Sorry :(

My reasoning:

  • I haven't been using this project or even using Neorg for some time - since early August 2023.
  • Neorg itself just isn't ready yet, for me to use it how I'd like.
  • Specific issues with the current norg parser have made it hard to develop this plugin.
    • Mainly, it's really hard to concurrently output text correctly inside a ranged tag, given the current AST. It's really hard to avoid writing text out beyond the tag's end marker.
  • The plugin ecosystem isn't ready (for me at least).
    • Mainly, there's no built-in test runner. This plugin is quite ambitious and complex, and it was maddening to rely on manual testing for it.

So, these things which would need to happen before I'd personally begin working on this again:

  1. Usability: I'm waitng for GTD. (I'm mainly just hoping for a cohesive capture/refile/agenda UI, and I think GTD will include that + much more). This is on its way.
  2. Bugfixes: I believe this plugin will be much easier to work on with the new version of the norg parser. i.e. once ranged tags are represented more cleanly in the AST. Vhyrro has indicated that this will be fixed in the new parser.
  3. Developer experience: I'd like a basic test framework for plugin authors to run tests. Vhyrro has expressed this as a likely future feature, but it's far from the most-urgent thing.

Please don't take this as a dig at Neorg or the project team, they're great. Neorg's a great project and I'm still keen to contribute in future.

When Neorg's moved along somewhat, I'll take another look and look to pick this up again.

In the meantime, PRs are welcome, and I'd be happy to link from this page to an active fork (or alternative plugin), if someone wants to move this forwards.

Ta


neorg-exec

**PRE-ALPHA** - breaking changes incoming soon. See Planning, below

@code block execution for neorg, similar to Org Mode's 'eval'.

This code began with tamton-aquib's PR - thanks to @tamton-aquib.

An example

In a norg file, move the cursor into the code block and execute :Neorg exec cursor.

The lua code will run and the @result tag will be [re]-generated.

@code lua
print('hello, neorg')
@end

@result
hello, neorg
@end

Goals and non-goals

This project is super early in development, and working out what it wants to be. Conceptually, it would be nice to reproduce some of the success of org-babel, but the scope should be limited.

Eventually, Neorg will have its own native core.exec module. Maybe some of this code will be used, maybe not. For now I'm taking advice from the Neorg team to try and ensure this fits reasonably into the ecosystem.

Some goals

  • Goal: Support a literate programming use case, but don't try to solve all its problems.
  • Goal: execute norg @code blocks according to per-language configurations.
  • Goal: capture results into @result tags, which are themselves 'verbatim ranged tags'.
  • Goal: schedule execution appropriately, such that code executions don't interfere with one another.
  • Goal: support extension via public functions.
  • Goal: make use of existing modules like core.tangle, where appropriate.
  • Goal: use a sensible set of tags for affecting the behaviour of code execution.
  • Goal: an API to allow for adding runners for different languages.
  • Goal: provide some runtime flexibility.
    • Provide support for environment variables, arguments, compilation options, some basic error handling.
    • Output handling options - to current-file, an external file, virtual lines.
    • Either execute a code block in its own process, or (for debugging), a long-running REPL-style session.

Non-goals

These non-goals are useful to help define the API, so that people can extend with their own modules.

  • Non-goal: tangling (exporting code to files). See core.tangle.
  • Non-goal: processing results. This should be done with macros. Maybe another module.
  • Non-goal: org-babel style interopability between languages and data sources. Another module might look to reproduce these amazing features.
  • Non-goal: a comprehensive platform of language & OS code runners, containerised runners, all that jazz.

🔧 Installation

First, make sure to pull this plugin down. This plugin does not run any code in of itself.

It requires Neorg to load it first:

You can install it through your favorite plugin manager:

  • packer.nvim
    use {
        "nvim-neorg/neorg",
        config = function()
            require('neorg').setup {
                load = {
                    ["core.defaults"] = {},
                    ...
                    ["external.exec"] = {},
                },
            }
        end,
        requires = { "nvim-lua/plenary.nvim", "laher/neorg-exec" },
    }
  • vim-plug
    Plug 'nvim-neorg/neorg' | Plug 'nvim-lua/plenary.nvim' | Plug 'laher/neorg-exec'

    You can then put this initial configuration in your init.vim file:

    lua << EOF
    require('neorg').setup {
      load = {
          ["core.defaults"] = {},
          ...
          ["external.exec"] = {},
      },
    }
    EOF
  • lazy.nvim
    require("lazy").setup({
        {
            "nvim-neorg/neorg",
            opts = {
                load = {
                    ["core.defaults"] = {},
                    ...
                    ["external.exec"] = {},
                },
            },
            dependencies = { { "nvim-lua/plenary.nvim" }, { "laher/neorg-exec" } },
        }
    })

Usage

Given a norg file containing a code block like this:

@code bash
 print hello
@end

You can exec the code block under the cursor with an ex command:

:Neorg exec cursor

cursor also works on headings. It will execute all code blocks within that heading section.

To run all blocks in the file, you can use current-file.

:Neorg exec current-file

Or you can bind a key like this:

vim.keymap.set('n', '<localleader>x', ':Neorg exec cursor<CR>', {silent = true}) -- just this block or blocks within heading section
vim.keymap.set('n', '<localleader>X', ':Neorg exec current-file<CR>', {silent = true}) -- whole file

Note: localleader is like leader but intended more for specific filetypes, such as .norg. You can use leader if you prefer).

The result

By default, the result will be written into the buffer, directly below the code tag's @end tag:

#result.start
#result.exit 0.01s 0
@result
hello
@end

Tags to render the results

Provide some tags to specify how to run the code.

  • exec.name {name} (or just name {name}) - names the block
  • exec.out {virtual|inplace} (or just out {virtual|inplace}) - specifies how to render the output. (default is out inplace).
  • exec.session {sessionid} (or session {sessionid}) - indicates that this block can be run in a named session. In this way you can run or re-run blocks in the same interpreter. NOTE that sessions can only apply to languages which are configured with a repl_cmd.
  • exec.env.KEY val (or env.KEY val) - set an environment variable.
  • exec.enabled false can be used to disable code execution.
#exec.name helloworld
#exec.out virtual
#exec.env.NAME neorg
@code bash
 print hello $NAME
@end

After running a code block with virtual rendering, you can use two other subcommands:

  • materialize to write all virtual text to the file, 'in place'.
  • or clear to delete the virtual text. clear also clears @result blocks from the file.

Document metadata

Use the exec metadata tag, to configure metadata for the whole file. Note that carrover tags override document metadata.

For example:

@document.meta
exec: {
  out: virtual
  env: {
    MYVAR: val
  }
}
@end

Configuration

Default configuration settings can be seen in config.lua.

When you configure neorg, you can override some of these settings, like so:

      ["external.exec"] = {
        config = {
          default_metadata = {
            enabled = false,
            env = {
              NEORG: "rocks"
            },
          },
          lang_cmds = {
            lua = {
              cmd = "luajit ${0}", -- use a different command for running lua
              type = "interpreted",
              repl = nil, -- disable sessions
            },
          },
        }
      },
  • The default_metadata section serves as global defaults for exec metadata.
    • default_metadata is overridden by document metadata and carryover tags.
    • Note how we set enabled = false,. If you set this, you'll need to enable @code blocks (or whole documents) explicitly.
    • You could also e.g. set some default env variables and out = "virtual".
  • See the lang_cmds section for per-language runtime configuration. A language type should be either "interpreted" or "compiled".

An example of an interpreted language which supports sessions via a repl:

lang_cmds = {
    lua = {
        cmd = "lua ${0}",
        type = "interpreted",
        repl = "lua -i",
    },
    ...
}

An example for a compiled language, which supports wrapping into a main function. This example executes some steps before & after running the binary.

lang_cmds = {
    cpp = {
        cmd = "g++ ${0} && ./a.out && rm ./a.out",
        type = "compiled",
        main_wrap = [[
        #include <iostream>
        int main() {
            ${1}
        }
        ]],
    },
    ...
}

Planning

Not really planning as such. More of a rambling list.

Some bugs I noticed after importing

  • After an invocation fails, there's sometimes an index-out-of-bounds when you retry.
  • Rendering quirks:
    • Results rendering can be a bit unpredictable. Sometimes it gets a bit mangled, sometimes it can duplicate the results section. * I addressed a lot of the quirks by locating the @result block with treesitter.
    • Spinner is also a bit funky.
    • virtual mode does some weird stuff affecting navigation around the file. * seems better now. As good as it can be.

I'd like to do

  • Much of the original PR checklist - see below

  • Scheduling:

    • One queue (try plenary.async), one consumer. Single thread executing code.
    • Usually one session & one process at a time, but support multiple workers for 'session' support a la org-mode
  • UI:

    • Render 'virtual lines' into a popup instead of the buffer. Doesn't suit multiple blocks
    • Maybe spinner could go into the gutter.
    • output handling: 'replace' @result block (instead of 'prepend' another @result block)
  • Code block tagging, for indicating how to run the code.

    • Similar to org-mode's tagging for code block environment and result handling.
    • Options:
      • [-] Consider tags above code blocks like #exec cache=5m pwd=.. result.tagtype=@
      • Could instead be individual tags per item <- This is @vhyrro's preference.
      • [-] Or, possibly even merge it into the @code line ... @code bash cache=5m
    • env support.
      • try plenary.job for easy env support. Maybe there are some other benefits too.
    • Caching - similar to org-mode but with cache timeout (plus the hash in the result block)
    • Named blocks.
    • Handling options for stderr, etc. Needs thought - do we want nested tags?
    • Output type? e.g. json. Then results could be syntax-hightlighted just like code blocks.
  • Results

    • Render in a ranged tag? like @result\ndone...\n@end (or optionally |result\n** some norg-formatted output\n|end)
      • verbatim only, for now. It seems like Macros could fulfil generation of norg markup <- @vhyrro's recommendation.
        • out=file filename.out
        • out=silent
        • What to do about stderr vs stdout? prefixes?
    • Tag with start time? like #exec.start 2020-01-01T00:11:22.123Z
    • Then maybe at the end ... (insert above the @result tag)
      • duration - #exec.duration_s 1.23s
      • exit code
  • A way to assess whether a compiler/interpreter is available & feasible. e.g. type -p gcc. Seems related to cross-platform support.

  • Run multiple blocks at once, within a node, etc. Caching, env variables, macros?

    • whole buffer
    • all blocks under a heading
  • Hopefully, tangle integration.

  • file-level tagging (similar to @code block tagging)

  • Subcommand changes:

    • rename view to virtual.
    • Restructure, maybe: :Neorg exec cursor [normal|virtual] :Neorg exec buf [normal|virtual] ... not sure yet how to make this extendable.
    • Cursor mode to support 'all code blocks within current norg object'
  • Macro support:

    • .exec.call named-block arg arg
    • .exec.result named-result
    • some way to address code blocks across files.
    • some way to chain things together? IDK if this is a good idea, but maybe worth thinking about.
  • virtual-mode: keep or not keep?

    • Options:
      • Keep
        • it's kinda cool.
        • maybe more suitable for some use cases? like literate programming? Hard to assess
      • Not keep ... keeping it.
        • a little bit memory hungry (we need to keep all the lines in a table aswell as the virtual lines).
        • The code is a bit more complicated & stateful because of this.
        • Workflow is a bit non-obvious.
        • We could retain virtual lines for stats? and progress reporting?
  • Security:

  • Safety options:

    • don't run multiple without confirm?
    • chroot jails? out of scope
    • docker-based runners? out of scope
    • memory limits, timeouts, etc?
    • killing processes? esp sessions.
    • enabled false, can be configured as a default or a file/block lebel.
      • (could be the default, maybe?)
  • Integration with core.tangle:

    • Respect core.tangle tags somehow?
      • Or at least follow the naming conventions. (e.g. current-file)
    • Use core.tangle to pre-process code blocks? Is that even feasible?

Planning - some examples

Some examples of what I think a nice tagged code block + results block could look like ... feedback welcome.

Most of these carryover tags haven't been implemented. But they could be.

#exec.cache 5m
#exec.pwd=..
#exec.results=replace
@code bash
ls
@end

#exec.start 2020-01-01T00:11:22.123Z hash=0000deadbeef1234
#exec.exit 0 1.23s
@result
dir/
file1.txt
file2.txt
@end

'Possible todos' from original PR

See [https://github.com/nvim-neorg/neorg/pull/618#issue-1402358683](Pull Request)

  • cross platform support.
  • spinner for running block.
  • run for
    • compiled (c, cpp, rust, etc)
      • check extra parameters for wrapping in main function? (+ named blocks)
    • interpreted (python, lua, bash, etc)
  • subcommands
    • view (virtual_lines) renamed to virtual
    • normal (maybe a better command name, normal lines added to buffer.)
  • add logging?
  • check for timeout / limit number of output lines.
  • make non-blockable if possible (weird python behaviour)
  • user config options. (done now IMO)
  • set lines to separate files and run.
  • panic messages instead of empty returns.
  • assign state for each running block instead of tracking the current one. (will fix spinners and re-execution bugs)
  • code cleanup. (done now IMO)

About

code block execution for neorg (similar to org-eval)

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published