Release 1.0 #174
Merged
Release 1.0 #174
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@Joel-Dahne I've done this already a few times with Zenodo, I'll take care of this. Follow up: so this was just flipping one switch there ;) after a new release we'll get the doi and a badge to boast about it ;D (those guys at Zenodo are simply amazing when it comes to ease of use!). |
kalmarek
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Except for one minor thing, see below, I think we are now ready for a 1.0 release. Everything I mention in #165 has been taken care of. This PR contains three changes
The one remaining thing I had in mind was if we should add a doi identifier for the repository, using e.g. Zenodo. I have not done this before and I don't know exactly how to think about this. So far I have mentioned Arblib.jl in three separate publications and it seems like it would make sense to have a doi link combined with proper archiving. Do you have any thoughts about this?
Also, do you have anything else you think we should handle before 1.0?
Once we do a release I thought I would send an email about it on the Flint email list and possibly also a post at the Julia discourse.
Sorry for keeping you so busy 😅