Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
bcachefs: Fix snapshot_create_lock lock ordering
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc2-ktest-00018-gebd1d148b278 #144 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ fio/1345 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88813e200ab8 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch2_truncate+0x76/0xf0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888105a1fa38 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_truncate+0x7b/0xc0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.}-{3:3}: down_write+0x3d/0xd0 bch2_write_iter+0x1c0/0x10f0 vfs_write+0x24a/0x560 __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x77/0xb0 x64_sys_call+0x17e5/0x1ab0 do_syscall_64+0x68/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 -> #1 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}: mnt_want_write+0x4a/0x1d0 filename_create+0x69/0x1a0 user_path_create+0x38/0x50 bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x315/0xbf0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x297/0xaf0 x64_sys_call+0x10cb/0x1ab0 do_syscall_64+0x68/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 -> #0 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1445/0x25b0 lock_acquire+0xbd/0x2b0 down_read+0x40/0x180 bch2_truncate+0x76/0xf0 bchfs_truncate+0x240/0x3f0 bch2_setattr+0x7b/0xb0 notify_change+0x322/0x4b0 do_truncate+0x8b/0xc0 do_ftruncate+0x110/0x270 __x64_sys_ftruncate+0x43/0x80 x64_sys_call+0x1373/0x1ab0 do_syscall_64+0x68/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &c->snapshot_create_lock --> sb_writers#10 --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13); lock(sb_writers#10); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13); rlock(&c->snapshot_create_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information