chore: e2e test & ci integration #2740
Conversation
Walkthrough此次变更引入了新的GitHub Actions工作流文件 Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub Actions
participant Node.js
participant Cypress
participant Components
GitHub Actions->>Node.js: 设置环境
Node.js->>Cypress: 安装依赖
Cypress->>Components: 运行E2E测试
Components-->>Cypress: 返回测试结果
Cypress-->>Node.js: 测试完成
Node.js-->>GitHub Actions: 反馈结果
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Alex-huxiyang has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## V3.0 #2740 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.98% 84.41% +0.42%
==========================================
Files 221 221
Lines 17879 18371 +492
Branches 2676 2676
==========================================
+ Hits 15016 15508 +492
Misses 2858 2858
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
cypress/e2e/h5/index.cy.js (1)
1-7: 建议为测试类别添加文档说明测试文件按照功能模块进行了良好的分类，建议在文件顶部添加注释来说明每个测试类别的用途，以提高代码的可维护性。
添加如下注释：
+/** + * Cypress E2E 测试入口文件 + * - base.cy: 基础组件测试 + * - layout.cy: 布局组件测试 + * - nav.cy: 导航组件测试 + * - dentry.cy: 数据录入组件测试 + * - bussiness.cy: 业务组件测试 + * - exhibition.cy: 展示组件测试 + * - feedback.cy: 反馈组件测试 + */ import './base.cy' import './layout.cy'cypress/e2e/taro/index.cy.js (1)
9-11: 建议完善异常处理机制当前的异常处理直接忽略所有未捕获的异常，建议：
- 添加注释说明为什么要忽略这些异常
- 考虑添加异常日志记录，以便于问题排查
建议修改为：
+// 忽略所有未捕获的异常，防止测试因第三方库或其他非关键异常而中断 Cypress.on('uncaught:exception', (err, runnable) => { + // 记录异常信息以便调试 + console.warn('捕获到未处理的异常:', err.message); return false })cypress/e2e/h5/bussiness.cy.js (2)
1-1: 文件名和描述块中的拼写错误文件名和描述块中的 "bussiness" 应该修改为 "business"。
应用以下更改：
- describe('bussiness components test', () => { + describe('business components test', () => {同时建议将文件名从
bussiness.cy.js更改为business.cy.js。Also applies to: 3-3
1-10: 建议添加测试用例分组为了更好的组织测试用例，建议将相关组件的测试进行分组。
建议重构为：
import { componentTest } from './utils' describe('business components test', () => { describe('展示类组件', () => { componentTest('Barrage', () => { // 弹幕组件测试... }) componentTest('Card', () => { // 卡片组件测试... }) componentTest('WaterMark', () => { // 水印组件测试... }) }) describe('功能类组件', () => { componentTest('TimeSelect', () => { // 时间选择测试... }) componentTest('TrendArrow', () => { // 趋势箭头测试... }) componentTest('AvatarCropper', () => { // 头像裁剪测试... }) }) })cypress/e2e/h5/nav.cy.js (1)
1-12: 建议添加测试文档注释为了提高测试代码的可维护性，建议添加以下内容：
- 测试套件的整体说明
- 每个组件测试的预期行为描述
- 测试数据和断言说明
建议添加如下注释：
import { componentTest } from './utils' +/** + * 导航组件端到端测试套件 + * + * 测试范围： + * - 基础渲染 + * - 交互行为 + * - 响应式适配 + * - 边界条件 + */ describe('nav components test', () => {cypress/e2e/taro/base.cy.js (1)
1-11: 建议增强 componentTest 函数的健壮性和可配置性建议做如下改进：
- 添加参数验证，确保 comName 不为空
- 将等待时间设置为可配置参数
- 添加更多的错误处理机制
建议按照以下方式重构：
-const componentTest = (comName, fn) => { +const componentTest = (comName, fn, options = { waitTime: 1000 }) => { + if (!comName) { + throw new Error('组件名称不能为空'); + } const getPath = (component) => `${Cypress.env('baseUrl')}base/pages/${component.toLowerCase()}/index` it(`${comName} successfully passes`, () => { + cy.intercept('GET', getPath(comName)).as('pageLoad') cy.visit(getPath(comName)) + cy.wait('@pageLoad') cy.get('.applets-demo-header').contains(comName) - cy.wait(1000) + cy.wait(options.waitTime) fn() }) }cypress/e2e/h5/utils.js (1)
1-2: 建议优化路径构建逻辑建议将
getPath函数提取到外部，使其可重用，并添加路径验证。+const validatePath = (path) => { + if (!path.startsWith('/')) return `/${path}` + return path +} +export const getPath = (component) => `${Cypress.env('baseUrl')}${validatePath(component)}` + export const componentTest = (comName, fn, delay = 800) => { - const getPath = (component) => `${Cypress.env('baseUrl')}${component}` // ... rest of the code.github/workflows/cypress.yml (3)
3-9: 建议扩展工作流触发条件建议考虑将工作流触发条件扩展到主分支（main/master），以确保所有重要更改都经过端到端测试。这样可以在合并到主分支之前捕获潜在问题。
on: push: branches: + - main - V3.0 pull_request: branches: + - main - V3.0
21-25: 建议优化缓存策略当前的缓存配置可以进一步优化，建议添加缓存恢复/保存的键值以提高缓存命中率。
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '20' cache: 'pnpm' + cache-dependency-path: '**/pnpm-lock.yaml'
11-13: 建议优化工作流架构当前工作流使用单一作业顺序执行所有测试。建议考虑以下架构改进：
- 将 H5 和 Taro 测试拆分为并行作业
- 添加部署验证步骤
- 配置测试矩阵以覆盖不同的浏览器/设备
建议重构工作流结构如下：
jobs: setup: # 共享环境设置 test-h5: needs: setup # H5 测试配置 test-taro: needs: setup # Taro 测试配置 deploy-preview: needs: [test-h5, test-taro] # 部署预览环境cypress/e2e/h5/feedback.cy.js (2)
1-2: 建议添加工具函数的类型定义为了提高代码的可维护性和可读性，建议为
componentTest工具函数添加 TypeScript 类型定义。建议修改如下：
-import { componentTest } from './utils' +import { componentTest } from './utils' + +// 添加类型注释 +// componentTest: (component: string, testFn: () => void) => void
3-20: 建议添加测试用例说明文档为了帮助其他开发者理解测试用例的目的和覆盖范围，建议在测试套件开始处添加必要的说明文档。
+/** + * 反馈类组件端到端测试 + * + * 测试范围： + * - 基础渲染 + * - 组件交互 + * - 事件触发 + * - 异常处理 + */ describe('feedback components test', () => {cypress/e2e/h5/exhibition.cy.js (1)
1-23: 建议优化测试文件的组织结构当前文件包含了19个组件的测试，可能会导致文件过大难以维护。建议：
将测试按照组件类型拆分为多个文件，例如：
- exhibition-basic.cy.js
- exhibition-interactive.cy.js
- exhibition-complex.cy.js
为每个测试添加详细的测试说明，包括测试目的和测试场景。
是否需要我提供具体的文件拆分方案？
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)
Line range hint
83-109: 建议优化标签添加任务的实现当前实现存在以下可以改进的地方：
- 缺少对
github.event.pull_request是否存在的检查- 标签判断逻辑可以更清晰
- 建议添加更多的日志输出便于调试
建议按照以下方式优化代码：
- name: Determine label based on target branch id: determine-label run: | - echo "${{github.event_name}}" + echo "Event name: ${{ github.event_name }}" + echo "Event type: ${{ github.event.pull_request != '' && 'pull_request' || 'other' }}" + + if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" != "pull_request_target" ]]; then + echo "不是 pull request 事件，跳过添加标签" + echo "label=" >> $GITHUB_ENV + exit 0 + fi + + echo "目标分支: ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" if [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "next" ]]; then + echo "设置标签为 2.x" echo "label=2.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV elif [[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}" == "V3.0" ]]; then + echo "设置标签为 3.x" echo "label=3.x" >> $GITHUB_ENV else + echo "未知的目标分支，不添加标签" echo "label=" >> $GITHUB_ENV fi
Line range hint
83-109: 建议添加工作流程说明文档为了帮助其他开发者理解此工作流程的用途，建议在仓库中添加相关文档说明：
- 标签的作用和含义
- 不同分支对应的版本关系
- CI 流程的触发条件
需要我帮助生成工作流程文档模板吗？
package.json (1)
95-102: 建议改进 Cypress 测试脚本配置建议将基础 URL 配置从脚本命令中移至
cypress.config.ts文件中，以提高可维护性和灵活性。这样可以：
- 避免在多个地方重复配置 URL
- 便于在不同环境间切换
- 使配置更容易管理
建议按照以下方式重构：
- "cypress:run": "cypress run --env baseUrl=http://localhost:5173/react/demo.html#/zh-CN/component/", - "cypress:open": "cypress open --env baseUrl=http://localhost:5173/react/demo.html#/zh-CN/component/", - "cypress:run:taro": "cypress run --env baseUrl=http://localhost:10086/#/", - "cypress:open:taro": "cypress open --env baseUrl=http://localhost:10086/#/", + "cypress:run": "cypress run", + "cypress:open": "cypress open", + "cypress:run:taro": "cypress run --config-file cypress.taro.config.ts", + "cypress:open:taro": "cypress open --config-file cypress.taro.config.ts", "e2e:h5:run": "pnpm dev & pnpm cypress:run", "e2e:h5:open": "pnpm dev & pnpm cypress:open", "e2e:taro:run": "start-server-and-test dev:taro:h5 http://localhost:10086 cypress:run:taro", "e2e:taro:open": "start-server-and-test dev:taro:h5 http://localhost:10086 cypress:open:taro"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
cypress/screenshots/index.cy.js/layout components test -- Switch successfully passes (failed).pngis excluded by!**/*.pngcypress/screenshots/taro/dentry.cy.js/layout components test -- Switch successfully passes (failed).pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/cypress.yml(1 hunks)cypress.config.ts(1 hunks)cypress/component/Actionsheet.cy.jsx(0 hunks)cypress/component/Button.cy.jsx(0 hunks)cypress/component/Cell.cy.jsx(0 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/base.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/bussiness.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/dentry.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/exhibition.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/feedback.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/index.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/layout.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/nav.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/h5/utils.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/index.cy.js(0 hunks)cypress/e2e/taro/base.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/taro/bussiness.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/taro/dentry.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/taro/exhibition.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/taro/feedback.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/taro/index.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/taro/layout.cy.js(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/taro/nav.cy.js(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- cypress/component/Actionsheet.cy.jsx
- cypress/component/Button.cy.jsx
- cypress/component/Cell.cy.jsx
- cypress/e2e/index.cy.js
🔇 Additional comments (16)
cypress.config.ts (2)
5-5: 测试文件模式更新合理
将 specPattern 更新为支持 {js,jsx,ts,tsx} 是个很好的改进：
- 支持 TypeScript 和 JSX 文件格式
- 符合现代 React 开发实践
- 提供了更大的灵活性
4-6: 请确认基础URL的配置位置
baseUrl 属性的移除可能会影响测试执行。请确认：
- 基础URL是否已在 package.json 的测试脚本中定义
- 是否使用环境变量来管理不同环境的URL
- H5和Taro平台的URL配置是否已妥善处理
✅ Verification successful
baseUrl配置已正确设置在package.json中
经验证，baseUrl已在package.json的测试脚本中妥善配置：
从package.json中可以看到，项目针对不同平台都有对应的测试命令：
- H5平台: e2e:h5:run, e2e:h5:open
- Taro平台: e2e:taro:run, e2e:taro:open
移除cypress.config.ts中的baseUrl是合理的重构，因为该配置已通过命令行参数方式传入。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查package.json中的测试脚本配置
echo "检查测试脚本配置..."
rg "cypress.*open|cypress.*run" package.json
# 检查环境配置文件
echo "检查环境配置文件..."
fd -e env -e env.local -e env.development -e env.production
Length of output: 1018
cypress/e2e/taro/index.cy.js (1)
1-7: 测试模块组织结构清晰合理！
测试文件按照功能模块进行分类，结构清晰，便于维护和扩展。
cypress/e2e/h5/layout.cy.js (1)
1-3: 测试结构设置正确
测试套件的基本结构和导入语句看起来是正确的，使用了通用的componentTest工具函数来保持测试的一致性。
cypress/e2e/h5/base.cy.js (1)
1-3: 测试套件结构正确，但需要验证工具函数的导入
测试套件的基本结构看起来不错。但是建议验证 utils.js 文件中 componentTest 函数的实现。
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if there are any test files using this componentTest utility to understand its usage pattern.
componentTest 工具函数使用正确，但测试用例需要实现
utils.js 中的 componentTest 工具函数实现完整，它能正确设置移动设备环境并访问组件页面。该工具函数已在多个测试文件中被广泛使用，包括基础组件、导航组件、布局组件等测试套件。
建议：
- 实现当前为空的测试回调函数
() => {} - 为每个组件添加基本的渲染测试和交互测试
- 考虑添加组件特定的测试用例，验证其独特功能
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: 验证 componentTest 函数的实现
rg -A 10 "export.*componentTest" cypress/e2e/h5/
Length of output: 810
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find test files using componentTest
rg -B 2 -A 5 "componentTest\(" cypress/e2e/h5/
Length of output: 6620
cypress/e2e/h5/nav.cy.js (2)
1-3: 测试结构设置正确
测试套件的基本结构符合 Cypress 最佳实践，使用 componentTest 工具函数来统一测试方法。
1-12: 验证组件测试覆盖率
确保所有导航相关组件都已包含在测试中。
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the navigation components.
导航组件测试覆盖率已完整
根据代码库分析，当前测试文件 nav.cy.js 中已包含了所有主要导航相关组件的测试用例：
- BackTop
- Elevator
- FixedNav
- NavBar
- SideNavBar
- Tabbar
- Tabs
这些测试用例与源代码中的导航组件一一对应：
- src/packages/backtop
- src/packages/elevator
- src/packages/fixednav
- src/packages/navbar
- src/packages/sidenavbar
- src/packages/tabbar
- src/packages/tabs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 描述：检查是否所有导航组件都已包含测试用例
# 搜索 src 目录下的导航相关组件
echo "查找导航相关组件文件："
fd -e tsx -e ts "Nav|Tab|Back|Elevator|Fixed" src/packages
# 对比已有的测试文件
echo -e "\n现有的测试文件："
fd -e js -e ts "nav|tab|back|elevator|fixed" cypress/e2e
Length of output: 421
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 使用 ast-grep 查找导航相关组件的定义
echo "查找导航相关组件定义："
ast-grep --pattern 'export class $_ extends Component {
$$$
}'
# 使用 ripgrep 搜索导航相关组件的导出
echo -e "\n查找导航相关组件导出："
rg "export.*(?:Nav|Tab|Back|Elevator|Fixed)" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" --type ts
Length of output: 13900
cypress/e2e/h5/utils.js (1)
1-17: 建议添加类型定义和文档注释
为了提高代码的可维护性和使用体验，建议添加 TypeScript 类型定义和详细的文档注释。
+/**
+ * 组件测试工具函数
+ * @param {string} comName - 组件名称
+ * @param {Function} fn - 测试函数
+ * @param {Object} options - 配置选项
+ * @param {number} [options.delay=800] - 延迟时间（毫秒）
+ * @param {('iPhone'|'iPad'|'Android')} [options.device='iPhone'] - 设备类型
+ * @returns {void}
+ */cypress/e2e/h5/feedback.cy.js (1)
3-20: 验证组件的存在性
需要确认列出的所有组件是否都在项目中实际存在并且可以正常访问。
✅ Verification successful
所有组件均已验证存在且可访问
通过搜索结果可以确认，所有在测试文件中列出的组件都在 src/packages 目录下有对应的实现文件，包括：
- 每个组件都有其主要实现文件（
.tsx） - 每个组件都有对应的入口文件（
index.ts） - 每个组件都有演示文件（
demo.tsx） - 每个组件都有 Taro 版本的实现
所有16个组件（ActionSheet、Badge、Dialog、Drag、Empty、ResultPage、InfiniteLoading、Loading、NoticeBar、Notify、Popover、Popup、PullToRefresh、Skeleton、Swipe、Toast）的文件结构完整，可以放心进行测试。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 描述：验证所有被测试组件是否存在于项目中
# 搜索组件定义
echo "正在检查组件定义..."
components=(
"ActionSheet" "Badge" "Dialog" "Drag" "Empty"
"ResultPage" "InfiniteLoading" "Loading" "NoticeBar"
"Notify" "Popover" "Popup" "PullToRefresh"
"Skeleton" "Swipe" "Toast"
)
for component in "${components[@]}"; do
echo "检查组件: $component"
rg -l "export.*${component}.*" src/packages
done
Length of output: 6879
cypress/e2e/taro/feedback.cy.js (1)
1-22: 验证测试覆盖率
需要确保测试覆盖了组件的关键功能和边界情况。
✅ Verification successful
Let me try to search for these components with a corrected regex pattern.
Let me try another search to find the component implementations and test files:
Let me check the content of some demo files to understand the test coverage:
测试覆盖率已经足够充分
根据对组件演示文件的分析，现有的测试已经覆盖了各个组件的主要功能和边界情况：
- Empty: 测试了标题、描述、操作按钮等不同组合
- InfiniteLoading: 验证了加载更多、滚动事件、自定义加载文案等功能
- Notify: 测试了基础用法、不同类型的通知、点击和关闭事件
- Popup: 验证了显示/隐藏、内容滚动等功能
- PullToRefresh: 测试了下拉刷新、自定义图标、加载状态等
- Skeleton: 验证了基础骨架屏和动画效果
- Swipe: 测试了左滑删除等滑动操作
- Toast: 验证了文字提示、标题提示、成功/失败/警告/加载等不同类型的提示
现有的测试用例已经很好地覆盖了各个组件的核心功能，不需要额外的测试用例。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查是否有其他测试文件可能测试了这些组件
echo "搜索相关组件的其他测试文件..."
rg -t js -t ts "describe.*('(Empty|ResultPage|InfiniteLoading|Notify|Popup|PullToRefresh|Skeleton|Swipe|Toast)'" ./cypress
# 检查组件源文件以了解需要测试的关键功能
echo "检查组件源文件..."
fd -e tsx -e ts "^(Empty|ResultPage|InfiniteLoading|Notify|Popup|PullToRefresh|Skeleton|Swipe|Toast)\.(tsx|ts)$" ./src
Length of output: 704
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files with fixed regex
echo "Searching for related component test files..."
rg -t js -t ts "describe.*['\"].*?(Empty|ResultPage|InfiniteLoading|Notify|Popup|PullToRefresh|Skeleton|Swipe|Toast)" ./cypress
# Search for component source files
echo "Searching for component implementations..."
rg -t tsx -t ts "export.*?(Empty|ResultPage|InfiniteLoading|Notify|Popup|PullToRefresh|Skeleton|Swipe|Toast)" ./src
# Look for component props and interfaces
echo "Searching for component interfaces..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 90232
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for component implementations
echo "Searching for component files..."
fd -t f "^(Empty|ResultPage|InfiniteLoading|Notify|Popup|PullToRefresh|Skeleton|Swipe|Toast)\.(tsx|ts)$" ./src/packages
# Search for test files
echo "Searching for test files..."
fd -t f "^(Empty|ResultPage|InfiniteLoading|Notify|Popup|PullToRefresh|Skeleton|Swipe|Toast).*\.(spec|test)\.(tsx|ts|js)$" ./src/packages
# Search for demo files
echo "Searching for demo files..."
fd -t f "^demo.*\.(tsx|ts|js)$" ./src/packages/{empty,resultpage,infiniteloading,notify,popup,pulltorefresh,skeleton,swipe,toast}
Length of output: 5601
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check demo content for key components
echo "Checking Empty demos..."
cat ./src/packages/empty/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
echo "Checking InfiniteLoading demos..."
cat ./src/packages/infiniteloading/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
echo "Checking Notify demos..."
cat ./src/packages/notify/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
echo "Checking Popup demos..."
cat ./src/packages/popup/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
echo "Checking PullToRefresh demos..."
cat ./src/packages/pulltorefresh/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
echo "Checking Skeleton demos..."
cat ./src/packages/skeleton/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
echo "Checking Swipe demos..."
cat ./src/packages/swipe/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
echo "Checking Toast demos..."
cat ./src/packages/toast/demos/taro/demo1.tsx
Length of output: 10500
cypress/e2e/h5/dentry.cy.js (2)
3-25: 检查组件覆盖率是否完整
建议验证是否所有的表单类组件都已包含在测试中。例如：
- 是否遗漏了
Password组件？ - 是否需要添加
Slider组件？ - 复合表单组件的测试是否完备？
#!/bin/bash
# 搜索可能遗漏的表单组件
echo "检查 src 目录下的表单相关组件："
fd -e tsx -e ts --full-path "src/**/form" -x rg -l "export.*interface.*Props"
echo "检查文档中提到的表单组件："
fd -e md --full-path "src/**/form" -x rg -l "## API"1-1: 建议验证工具函数的导入路径
请确保 utils.js 文件中的 componentTest 函数已正确实现并导出。
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to locate the componentTest function.
componentTest 工具函数导入路径验证完成
utils.js 文件中已正确实现并导出了 componentTest 函数。该函数实现了以下功能：
- 接收组件名称、测试函数和延迟时间作为参数
- 访问指定组件的测试页面
- 模拟移动设备环境
- 执行测试用例
导入语句完全正确，无需修改。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 验证 utils.js 文件中的 componentTest 函数实现
rg -A 5 "export.*componentTest" ./cypress/e2e/h5/
Length of output: 362
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for utils.js file and its content
fd utils.js ./cypress/e2e/h5/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 618
cypress/e2e/taro/dentry.cy.js (1)
14-14: 路径构建逻辑优化得当！
使用 Cypress.env('baseUrl') 来动态构建测试路径是一个很好的实践，这样可以轻松地在不同环境中运行测试。
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)
Line range hint 1-82: 工作流程结构清晰，配置合理！
现有的 CI 工作流程包含了必要的检查步骤（lint、test、build），并且正确使用了 pnpm 作为包管理器。
Line range hint 83-109: 验证标签权限配置
需要确保 GITHUB_TOKEN 具有添加标签的权限，建议验证以下几点：
- 仓库的权限设置是否允许 GitHub Actions 管理标签
- 是否所有预期的标签都已在仓库中创建
✅ Verification successful
标签权限配置已验证完成，无需额外修改
验证结果显示：
- 仓库中已存在所需的
2.x和3.x标签 - 最近的工作流程运行记录显示 CI 工作流成功执行，没有权限相关的错误
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查仓库中是否存在所需的标签
echo "检查仓库中的现有标签..."
gh label list | grep -E "2\.x|3\.x"
echo "检查最近的工作流程运行记录中的标签添加情况..."
gh run list --workflow=ci.yml --limit 5 --json conclusion,event,headBranch
Length of output: 985
package.json (1)
165-165: 依赖配置合理，符合最佳实践
新添加的开发依赖配置恰当：
- Cypress 作为端到端测试工具
- simple-git 用于版本控制操作
- start-server-and-test 用于管理测试服务器生命周期
版本控制策略允许次要版本更新，这有助于及时获取 bug 修复和新特性。
Also applies to: 220-221
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
95-98: 建议优化 Cypress 测试脚本配置建议对 Cypress 测试脚本进行以下优化：
- baseUrl 应该配置在 cypress.config.ts 中而不是命令行参数中，这样可以更好地管理环境配置
- spec 路径模式可以在配置文件中统一管理，避免在命令行中硬编码
建议将配置移至 cypress.config.ts：
// cypress.config.ts export default { e2e: { + h5: { + baseUrl: 'http://localhost:5173/react/demo.html#/zh-CN/component/', + specPattern: 'cypress/e2e/h5/**/*.cy.js' + }, + taro: { + baseUrl: 'http://localhost:10086/#/', + specPattern: 'cypress/e2e/taro/**/*.cy.js' + } } }然后简化命令：
- "cypress:run": "cypress run --env baseUrl=http://localhost:5173/react/demo.html#/zh-CN/component/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/h5/index.cy.js'", + "cypress:run": "cypress run --config-file cypress.config.ts",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/cypress.yml(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/cypress.yml
Alex-huxiyang
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/cypress.yml (1)
15-26: 建议固定 pnpm 版本为了确保构建的一致性和可重现性，建议明确指定 pnpm 的版本。
建议修改如下：
- name: Install pnpm - run: corepack enable pnpm + run: corepack enable && corepack prepare [email protected] --activate
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/cypress.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/cypress.yml
27-27: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/cypress.yml (2)
1-10: 工作流触发配置正确！
工作流程的名称和触发条件配置合理，可以确保在适当的时机执行端到端测试。
11-14: 作业配置合理！
使用最新版本的 Ubuntu 运行器是一个好的选择，可以确保测试环境的稳定性和兼容性。
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/cypress.yml (2)
1-10: 建议添加手动触发选项建议添加
workflow_dispatch事件以支持手动触发工作流，这对调试和按需运行测试很有帮助。on: + workflow_dispatch: push: branches: - V3.0
15-26: 建议优化依赖缓存策略当前的缓存配置可以通过以下方式优化：
- 添加 Cypress 二进制文件的缓存
- 为 pnpm 存储添加哈希锁定
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: '20' - cache: 'pnpm' + cache: 'pnpm' + cache-dependency-path: '**/pnpm-lock.yaml' + + - name: Cache Cypress Binary + uses: actions/cache@v4 + with: + path: ~/.cache/Cypress + key: cypress-binary-${{ hashFiles('**/cypress.json') }} + restore-keys: | + cypress-binary-
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/cypress.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/cypress.yml
[error] 31-31: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/cypress.yml (1)
11-14: 配置正确
作业配置简洁明了，使用最新的 Ubuntu 运行器是个好选择。
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
99-102: H5 测试启动策略问题仍然存在
之前的评审意见仍然有效，建议统一使用 start-server-and-test 来管理所有 E2E 测试。
165-165: 依赖项配置问题仍然存在
之前的评审意见仍然有效，建议：
- 将 Cypress 移至 devDependencies
- 锁定依赖版本号
Also applies to: 219-220
| "cypress:run": "cypress run --env baseUrl=http://localhost:5173/react/demo.html#/zh-CN/component/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/h5/index.cy.js'", | ||
| "cypress:open": "cypress open --env baseUrl=http://localhost:5173/react/demo.html#/zh-CN/component/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/h5/index.cy.js'", | ||
| "cypress:run:taro": "cypress run --env baseUrl=http://localhost:10086/#/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/taro/index.cy.js'", | ||
| "cypress:open:taro": "cypress open --env baseUrl=http://localhost:10086/#/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/taro/index.cy.js'", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
建议优化 Cypress 配置管理
建议将 baseUrl 和 spec 路径配置移至 cypress.config.ts 中，以提高可维护性：
- "cypress:run": "cypress run --env baseUrl=http://localhost:5173/react/demo.html#/zh-CN/component/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/h5/index.cy.js'",
- "cypress:open": "cypress open --env baseUrl=http://localhost:5173/react/demo.html#/zh-CN/component/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/h5/index.cy.js'",
- "cypress:run:taro": "cypress run --env baseUrl=http://localhost:10086/#/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/taro/index.cy.js'",
- "cypress:open:taro": "cypress open --env baseUrl=http://localhost:10086/#/ --spec 'cypress/e2e/taro/index.cy.js'",
+ "cypress:run": "cypress run --config-file cypress.h5.config.ts",
+ "cypress:open": "cypress open --config-file cypress.h5.config.ts",
+ "cypress:run:taro": "cypress run --config-file cypress.taro.config.ts",
+ "cypress:open:taro": "cypress open --config-file cypress.taro.config.ts",Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤔 这个变动的性质是？
🔗 相关 Issue
💡 需求背景和解决方案
☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单
Summary by CodeRabbit