move to pyproject.toml #1024
move to pyproject.toml #1024
Conversation
ocefpaf
force-pushed
the
pyproject_toml
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7de648a
to
aaf5e1f
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1024 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 82.18% 82.18%
========================================
Files 24 24
Lines 5171 5171
Branches 1242 1242
========================================
Hits 4250 4250
Misses 622 622
Partials 299 299 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
| maintainers = [ | ||
| {name = "Dave Foster", email = "[email protected]"}, | ||
| {name = "Benjamin Adams"}, | ||
| {name = "Luke Campbell"}, | ||
| {name = "Filipe Fernandes"}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@benjwadams are you OK with this change? Most projects are moving away from "author" in liue for maintainers.
| [project.scripts] | ||
| compliance-checker = "cchecker:main" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is deprecated and in the future. We need a better solution to ship that script.
| license-files = ["LICENSE"] | ||
| zip-safe = false | ||
| include-package-data = true | ||
| script-files = ["cchecker.py"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ocefpaf
force-pushed
the
pyproject_toml
branch
from
8d51c4a
to
4f2af1a
Compare
|
Publishing to PyPI using Python 3.12 failed with: That is likely a problem with the cf_units wheel. I'll revert to use 3.11 b/c compliance-checker is pure Python but there is a change that folks using Python 3.12 will hit that issue. |
Work in progress and not ready for review.This is the new standard for Python packaging but there are some details missing to accommodate everything we do in compliance-checker, like shipping scripts is deprecated won't be support for much longer.