[PUI] Table refactor

[SchrodingersGat]

• Split table header component into different file, for better maintainability
• Add option to remove header entirely

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for inventree-web-pui-preview ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	5c41601
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/inventree-web-pui-preview/deploys/672381e41efaa2000825685a
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-8395--inventree-web-pui-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 100 (no change from production) Accessibility: 86 (no change from production) Best Practices: 100 (no change from production) SEO: 78 (no change from production) PWA: - View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 52.00000% with 36 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.29%. Comparing base (913a05c) to head (5c41601).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/frontend/src/tables/InvenTreeTableHeader.tsx	41.86%	21 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
src/frontend/src/tables/InvenTreeTable.tsx	62.96%	8 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
src/frontend/src/hooks/UseTable.tsx	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8395      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.39%   84.29%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files        1167     1168       +1     
  Lines       53230    53249      +19     
  Branches     1972     1978       +6     
==========================================
- Hits        44923    44885      -38     
- Misses       7814     7874      +60     
+ Partials      493      490       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backend	85.98% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pui	67.29% <51.35%> (-0.56%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[matmair]

Looks good; it seems that the header less feature was not used - is that planned in this PR?

[SchrodingersGat]

Looks good; it seems that the header less feature was not used - is that planned in this PR?

Not actually used yet, but planning to implement some "sub tables" (once I can get nested tables working)