Add Caching to scan-container

[tylertitsworth]

Description

Related Issue

MLOPS-2153

Changes Made

• The code follows the project's coding standards.
• No Intel Internal IP is present within the changes.
• The documentation has been updated to reflect any changes in functionality.

Validation

• I have tested any changes in container groups locally with test_runner.py with all existing tests passing, and I have added new tests where applicable.

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package	Version	Score	Details
actions/aquasecurity/trivy-action	915b19bbe73b92a6cf82a1bc12b087c9a19a5fe2	🟢 5.7	Details Check Score Reason Maintained 🟢 10 10 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Code-Review 🟢 8 Found 25/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8 CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected License 🟢 10 license file detected Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Token-Permissions ⚠️ 0 detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions Pinned-Dependencies ⚠️ 0 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration Vulnerabilities 🟢 10 0 existing vulnerabilities detected Fuzzing ⚠️ 0 project is not fuzzed Security-Policy ⚠️ 0 security policy file not detected SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0

Scanned Manifest Files

.github/workflows/container-ci.yaml

• aquasecurity/trivy-action@915b19b
• intel/ai-containers/.github/scan@main

[github-advanced-security]

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

[github-actions]

Integration Test Results

Groups Tested: pytorch/serving, pytorch/tests

Results

Test-Group	Test	Status
pytorch/serving	ipex-serving-cpu-model-archive	PASS
pytorch/serving	ipex-serving-cpu-workflow-archive	PASS
pytorch/serving	ipex-serving-cpu-rest-workflow	PASS
pytorch/serving	ipex-serving-cpu-rest-inference	PASS
pytorch/serving	ipex-serving-cpu-grpc-inference	PASS
pytorch/serving	ipex-serving-xpu-model-archive	PASS
pytorch/serving	ipex-serving-xpu-rest-inference	PASS
pytorch/tests	import-ipex-cpu-idp	PASS
pytorch/tests	import-ipex-cpu-pip	PASS
pytorch/tests	import-ipex-xpu-idp	PASS
pytorch/tests	import-ipex-xpu-pip	PASS
pytorch/tests	import-cpu-jupyter-idp	PASS
pytorch/tests	import-cpu-jupyter-pip	PASS
pytorch/tests	import-xpu-jupyter-idp	PASS
pytorch/tests	import-xpu-jupyter-pip	PASS
pytorch/tests	ipex-cpu-idp	PASS
pytorch/tests	ipex-cpu-pip	PASS
pytorch/tests	ipex-xpu-idp	PASS
pytorch/tests	ipex-xpu-pip	PASS
pytorch/tests	ipex-xpu-jupyter-idp	PASS
pytorch/tests	ipex-xpu-jupyter-pip	PASS

Overall Result: PASS ✅

[sramakintel]

Looks good. Thanks