Year 44 - Unique Fashion Party (~46 seconds, no exploit) #224
Conversation
I managed to shave of a few seconds from the current solution. Thze first thing I did was hardcoding some of the steps at the beginning. When stepping towards a wall, a worker will abort doing so very quickly and that is just very slightly faster than doing a loop with an if check. Also we need to step right at least 4 times, so no need to check here. This will mostly only speed up the first workers and the beginning tho. Furthermore, it is actually better to use the holes at the top and not at the bottom, even though the top ones are further away. It is better, because the bottleneck is this one wide gap everyone needs to go through. When stepping up, like I am doing here, the path at the bottom is blocked for a shorter amount of time. Credits should still go to marky1124 as well imo, since this is heavily based on his current version and I merely optimized that solution a bit.
NeunEinser
changed the title
|
Didn't see that. Personally I don't like solutions that are only possible in texteditor, though. |
|
there is a 50+ no text editor solution too. |
|
This is 100% tho. |
|
there is a 100% 2s solution with no editor exploits |
|
i think finding somewhat reasonable criteria that will make this solution the best one won't be very easy. |
|
we have this issue, still open: #139 |
Where? |
|
Well, why does this not get added then? It's like over 1 1/2 months old. I'm not gonna search a steam thread for solutions someone has possibly come up with this far back every time I wanna post something here... |
it does not get added because text editor solutions are allowed here (so 1s solution gets added). |
|
The pr is like 10 days old. My point was that this should've been added a long time ago. |
I managed to shave of a few seconds from the current solution.
Thze first thing I did was hardcoding some of the steps at the beginning. When stepping towards a wall, a worker will abort doing so very quickly and that is just very slightly faster than doing a loop with an if check. Also we need to step right at least 4 times, so no need to check here. This will mostly only speed up the first few workers at the beginning tho.
Furthermore, it is actually better to use the holes at the top and not at the bottom, even though the top ones are further away. It is better, because the bottleneck is this one wide gap everyone needs to go through. When stepping up, like I am doing here, the path at the bottom is blocked for a shorter amount of time.
Credits should still go to marky1124 as well imo, since this is heavily based on his current version and I merely optimized that solution a bit.