Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workflow to check code generation #866

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

halildurmus
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@halildurmus halildurmus force-pushed the generation-workflow branch 4 times, most recently from 4486bd6 to 32da360 Compare July 24, 2024 13:37
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.13%. Comparing base (8a87195) to head (70978fc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #866      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.93%   63.13%   +1.20%     
==========================================
  Files          33       17      -16     
  Lines        1056      670     -386     
==========================================
- Hits          654      423     -231     
+ Misses        402      247     -155     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@halildurmus halildurmus marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2024 13:47
@halildurmus halildurmus merged commit f607d33 into main Jul 24, 2024
6 checks passed
@halildurmus halildurmus deleted the generation-workflow branch July 24, 2024 13:50
@halildurmus halildurmus added the ci Changes to continuous integration label Jul 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci Changes to continuous integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants