Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

M9 Basin Term for US 2023 Model #10118

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

CB-quakemodel
Copy link
Contributor

@CB-quakemodel CB-quakemodel commented Nov 4, 2024

This PR adds the M9 Basin adjustment (as described on pp. 1178 of Moschetti et al. 2024 EQ spectra article on US 2023 NSHMP GMC). The M9 basin adjustment is an additive factor to the mean ground-motion for long period spectral accelerations (T > 1.9 s) of + log(2.0) for all sites with z2pt5 greater than 6 km.

The PR adds the following:

  1. A separate ModifiableGMPE class (as exists for example for CY14 site term and NRCAN15 site terms). Having a separate ModifiableGMPE class with importable basin adjustment function will be required for when we create the "M9" class of each US 2023 subduction interface GMM (AbrahamsonGulerce2020, KuehnEtAl2020, ParkerEtAl2020, AtkinsonMacias2009, ZhaoEtAl2006).

  2. The ability to specify the M9 basin adjustment as a kwarg when instantiating a ModifiableGMPE from a GSIM LT XML (or programmatically), like any other ModifiableGMPE capability such as the Al Atik 2015 sigma model.

  3. Some simple unit tests checking that the basin adjustment is only applied for long period ground-motions at sites with z2pt5 > 6 km, with an expected different of log(2.0) being obtained at these sites compared to the values obtained at the same sites with the unmodified version of the same GMM.

T > 1.9 s threshold is confirmed by 1) - usgs java code (line 205 of https://code.usgs.gov/ghsc/nshmp/nshmp-lib/-/blob/main/src/main/java/gov/usgs/earthquake/nshmp/gmm/AtkinsonMacias_2009.java?ref_type=heads) and 2) the discussion in OQ issues of how to implement these adjustments - #9894

@CB-quakemodel CB-quakemodel added this to the Engine 3.22.0 milestone Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants