-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Störerhaftung: change it to "what do you use" #87
Comments
add checkbox
|
add checkbox
|
Isn't "P2P Blocks" and "ZAPP Script" the same? |
info to self: see wiki how to implement checkboxes |
p2p block: some have done it to prevent störerhaftung in former times ... is totally blocking ports (which I personally reject ... because you cannot fix social challenges with technocratic restrictions ... I would prefer to enlighten and educate people) |
What have you implemented to fit to laws/restrictions and to force fairUse?
|
maybe that are 3 questions? FairUse, Laws/restrictions and Anon? |
we should rename that.. many checkboxes would not make sense or are redundant information
|
sorry, it was late last night, so I forgot to mention:
this field will be removed
routing will only cover routing protocols used in our meshes
will be removed, too
I think, net neutrality is the wrong word this field, however we name it, we planned to use to show things |
hm ok, so i would prefer checkboxes for störerhaftung/legal issues:
BUT, finally i think we should delete the "störerhaftung" because it makes no sense. we also dont make statistics about having or having not "lightning protection". legality is needed for not being illegal, but thats not a secret :-) many of these fields should be moved to "net neutrality".. f.i. the "timeout" will not interfere with this störerhaftung at all.. the "net neutrality" is another important topic and is discussed here: #91 |
add checkboxes for
remove störerhaftung and vpn fields
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: