chore(prueba && terminal): update deps #4
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@enzonotario has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across different packages. Key modifications include updating variable declarations in test files for improved mutability handling, upgrading development dependencies in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant A as Developer
participant B as Codebase
participant C as Dependency Manager
participant D as CI/CD System
A->>B: Update variable declaration
A->>B: Upgrade devDependencies
A->>B: Adjust HTML output style
A->>C: Update xterminal dependency
C->>B: Apply new dependency versions
A->>B: Modify test scripts
A->>D: Add new CI/CD workflow
D->>B: Run tests across environments
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
packages/prueba/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlpackages/terminal/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/esbabel/test/knownIssues.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/prueba/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/sandbox/test/utils/codeFrame.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/terminal/package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/sandbox/test/utils/codeFrame.test.ts
- packages/terminal/package.json
Additional comments not posted (5)
packages/prueba/package.json (5)
14-14: Verify compatibility and review changelog forconcurrentlyupdate.The
concurrentlydependency has been updated from version 7.x to 8.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's development workflow.Please review the changelog or release notes of
concurrentlyto understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.
15-15: Verify compatibility and review changelog forlog-symbolsupdate.The
log-symbolsdependency has been updated from version 5.x to 7.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's logging functionality.Please review the changelog or release notes of
log-symbolsto understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.
16-16: Verify compatibility, review changelog, and test TypeScript code fortypescriptupdate.The
typescriptdependency has been updated from version 4.x to 5.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's TypeScript code.Please take the following actions:
- Review the changelog or release notes of
typescriptto understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.- Thoroughly test the TypeScript code in the package to ensure compatibility with the new version of
typescript.
17-17: Verify compatibility, review changelog, and test build process and development server forviteupdate.The
vitedependency has been updated from version 4.x to 5.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's build process and development server.Please take the following actions:
- Review the changelog or release notes of
viteto understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.- Thoroughly test the package's build process and development server to ensure compatibility with the new version of
vite.
18-18: Verify compatibility, review changelog, and run and verify test cases forvitestupdate.The
vitestdependency has been updated from version 0.x to 2.x. While the caret (^) in the version specifier allows for backward-compatible updates, it's important to verify the compatibility of the new version with the package's testing setup and test cases.Please take the following actions:
- Review the changelog or release notes of
vitestto understand the changes introduced in the new version and ensure that there are no breaking changes that could affect the package.- Thoroughly run and verify the package's test cases to ensure compatibility with the new version of
vitest.
enzonotario
force-pushed
the
feature/update-deps
branch
from
a2feb23
to
1f282f0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/core/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/cli/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/core/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/language-tools/package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- packages/cli/package.json
- packages/core/package.json
- packages/language-tools/package.json
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/test.yml (6)
3-10: LGTM!Triggering the workflow on both pushes and pull requests to the
mainbranch is a good practice. It ensures that the tests are run for every change merged into the main branch and for every pull request.
16-20: LGTM!The matrix strategy configuration looks good:
- Using the latest LTS version of Node.js is a good practice.
- Running the tests on both Ubuntu and Windows ensures cross-platform compatibility.
- Setting
fail-fasttofalseensures that all jobs in the matrix are run even if one of them fails.
22-32: LGTM!The checkout and setup steps look good:
- The checkout step is using the latest version of the
actions/checkoutaction, which is a good practice.- The pnpm setup step is using version 9, which is the latest version at the time of this review.
- The Node.js setup step is using the version specified in the matrix and enabling caching for pnpm.
34-35: LGTM!Running
pnpm -r iis a good practice to install dependencies recursively. It ensures that all dependencies are installed in the correct order.
37-38: LGTM!Running
pnpm -r run buildis a good practice to build the project recursively. It ensures that all packages are built in the correct order.
40-41: LGTM!Running
pnpm run testis a good practice to run the tests. It ensures that the tests are run using the pnpm package manager.
| @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ | |||
| "build": "pnpm --stream -r run build", | |||
| "bump": "/bin/bash scripts/bump.sh", | |||
| "release": "/bin/bash scripts/release.sh", | |||
| "test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1", | |||
| "test": "pnpm --stream -r run test:run", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Standardize test scripts across packages and update placeholder scripts
The repository has a good testing structure with Vitest as the primary testing framework. However, there are some inconsistencies in the test script naming and implementation across packages:
- The root
package.jsonuses"test": "pnpm --stream -r run test:run", but not all packages have atest:runscript. - Most packages use
"test": "vitest"or"test:run": "vitest run", but some still have placeholder scripts.
To resolve these issues and improve the testing setup:
- Standardize test scripts across all packages:
- Use
"test": "vitest"for interactive testing - Add
"test:run": "vitest run"for CI/CD environments
- Use
- Update packages with placeholder scripts to use Vitest
- Consider aligning the root
package.json"test" script with package-level scripts:- Change to
"test": "pnpm --stream -r run test"for interactive testing - Add
"test:run": "pnpm --stream -r run test:run"for CI/CD environments
- Change to
These changes will ensure consistent test execution across the entire project and resolve the current mismatch between the root script and package-level scripts.
Analysis chain
Approve the changes to the "test" script.
The updated "test" script enhances the testing process by enabling actual test execution using the command pnpm --stream -r run test:run. This promotes a more structured approach to testing and improves the functionality compared to the previous placeholder script.
Consider the following additional suggestions:
- Add a
pretestscript to run any necessary setup steps before running the tests, such as database seeding or environment variable configuration. - Add a
posttestscript to run any necessary cleanup steps after running the tests, such as database teardown or artifact cleanup.
Ensure that the test:run script is defined in the package.json files of the individual packages for the tests to run successfully.
Run the following script to verify the existence of the test:run script in the package.json files:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `test:run` script is defined in the `package.json` files of the individual packages.
# Test: Search for `package.json` files in the sub-directories and check if they contain the `test:run` script.
# Expect: Each `package.json` file should have a `test:run` script defined.
fd package.json --exec bash -c 'grep -q "\"test:run\"" {} || echo "Missing test:run script in {}"'
Length of output: 1113
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for test-related scripts in package.json files and look for test files/directories
# Search for test-related scripts in package.json files
echo "Test-related scripts in package.json files:"
fd package.json --exec jq -r 'select(.scripts != null) | .scripts | to_entries[] | select(.key | test("test")) | "\(.parent.filename): \(.key): \(.value)"'
echo -e "\nTest files and directories:"
# Look for test files (common test file extensions)
fd -e test.js -e spec.js -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.vue -e spec.vue
# Look for test directories
fd -t d -d 2 '^(test|tests|__tests__)$'
Length of output: 2856
enzonotario
force-pushed
the
feature/update-deps
branch
from
1f282f0
to
8f028af
Compare
enzonotario
force-pushed
the
feature/update-deps
branch
from
8f028af
to
4c33b23
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
xterminalpackage for potential enhancements.Bug Fixes