Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export RetrieveItems function for external use and standardize naming #53

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DAcodedBEAT
Copy link

Export RetrieveItems function for external use and standardize naming

Description

  • Exported the RetrieveItems function to allow its use outside the admin package.
  • Corrected a typo in a comment within the User struct definition.
  • Standardized naming conventions by updating variable names to camelCase (e.g., asserted_users -> assertedUsers).
  • Renamed the responsePage interface to ResponsePage for use outside package.
  • Refactored methods and callback functions to use the newly exported RetrieveItems function and ResponsePage interface.

Motivation and Context

I made this change since /admin/v1/integrations is not exposed in this SDK. Rather than auditing all missing endpoints, I figured this helper function can be exposed so consumers can make use of this in the event multiple are missing.

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of Changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

… in admin module

- Exported the RetrieveItems function to allow its use outside the admin package.
- Corrected a typo in a comment within the User struct definition.
- Standardized naming conventions by updating variable names to camelCase (e.g., asserted_users -> assertedUsers).
- Renamed the `responsePage` interface to `ResponsePage` for use outside package.
- Refactored methods and callback functions to use the newly exported `RetrieveItems` function and `ResponsePage` interface.
@DAcodedBEAT
Copy link
Author

@duosecurity I don't see a CONTRIBUTING.md file in here - is there anything else needed to get this rolled out?

@DAcodedBEAT
Copy link
Author

@jaherne-duo / @AaronAtDuo - any ideas on who maintains this repository and if this can be merged?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant