Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dependency bumps 2024/09, fix version format #11

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kubukoz
Copy link
Member

@kubukoz kubukoz commented Sep 30, 2024

No description provided.

@kubukoz kubukoz mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
@kubukoz kubukoz mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
@kubukoz kubukoz changed the title Dependency bumps 2024/09 Dependency bumps 2024/09, fix version format Sep 30, 2024
@kubukoz kubukoz marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2024 15:05
ivy"software.amazon.smithy:smithy-waiters:$smithyVersion"
ivy"software.amazon.smithy:smithy-waiters:$smithyVersion",
ivy"software.amazon.smithy:smithy-aws-endpoints:$smithyVersion",
ivy"software.amazon.smithy:smithy-aws-smoke-test-model:$smithyVersion"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question: what are we doing about those? #9 (comment)

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ jobs:
mill -i __.publishArtifacts
mill -i io.kipp.mill.ci.release.ReleaseModule/publishAll
env:
PGP_PASSPHRASE: ${{ secrets.PGP_PASSPHRASE }}
PGP_PASSPHRASE: ""
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thought: the new key doesn't have a passphrase (generated in-browser on https://typelevel.org/sbt-typelevel/secrets.html)

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
name: Continuous Integration

on:
# pull_request:
# branches: ["*"]
pull_request:
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thought: this meant PRs wouldn't have any CI whatsoever, seems to be by omission.

Comment on lines +43 to +46
- name: Build packages
run: |
mill -i __.jar

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thought: seems to be the closest thing to package in sbt. Just compiling didn't discover the issues with missing traits because we need to run resources, at the very least.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant