Fix REST Posting File to v1/listen #265
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to logging configurations and method invocations across several files. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Client
participant RESTClient
User->>Client: Initiate streaming request
Client->>RESTClient: Call SetupRequest
RESTClient->>Client: Setup complete
Client->>User: Streaming started
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pkg/client/rest/v1/rest.go (1)
50-51: LGTM! Consider adding the method name to the log message.The added logging statement enhances debugging capabilities without altering the functionality. It's consistent with the existing logging style and uses an appropriate verbosity level.
To further improve the log message, consider including the method name:
klog.V(3).Infof("Client.SetupRequest: Using SetupRequest from REST Package\n")This addition would make it easier to trace the exact location of the log in the code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- examples/speech-to-text/rest/file/main.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/client/common/v1/rest.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/client/listen/v1/rest/client.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/client/rest/v1/rest.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
examples/speech-to-text/rest/file/main.go (1)
27-27: Approved change, but clarification neededThe change from
LogLevelTracetoLogLevelVerbosealigns with the goal of enhancing debugging visibility. However, I have a few points to address:
- Could you clarify how this change specifically addresses the REST posting file issue mentioned in the PR objectives?
- Consider adding a comment explaining why
LogLevelVerbosewas chosen for this example.- Is
LogLevelVerboseintended to be the default for this example, or should it be configurable? If it's meant to be configurable, consider adding a command-line flag or environment variable to set the log level.To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, let's check for other occurrences of
LogLevel:✅ Verification successful
LogLevel Change Verified
The update to
LogLevelVerboseinexamples/speech-to-text/rest/file/main.gois isolated and does not affect other parts of the codebase. This change effectively enhances debugging visibility as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of LogLevel in the codebase # Expected: Only this occurrence should be changed rg --type go 'LogLevel:' -C 2Length of output: 12110
pkg/client/common/v1/rest.go (1)
41-42: LGTM! Enhances debugging visibility.The added logging statement improves debugging capabilities by clearly indicating when the
SetupRequestmethod from the Common Package is being used. This aligns well with the goal of enhancing visibility for debugging purposes.To ensure this change addresses the mentioned bug fix for REST posting file to v1/listen (Issue #125), please run the following verification:
Could you please provide more context on how this logging statement specifically addresses the bug mentioned in Issue #125?
pkg/client/listen/v1/rest/client.go (1)
129-129: LGTM! Verify the impact on other parts of the codebase.The change from
c.RESTClient.SetupRequesttoc.RESTClient.Client.SetupRequestappears to be correct and aligns with the comment above it. This modification suggests a refactoring of theRESTClientstructure, possibly to improve organization or introduce new functionality.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please run the following verification script:
This will help identify any other locations in the codebase that might need similar updates.
✅ Verification successful
Verified the Change
The modification from
c.RESTClient.SetupRequesttoc.RESTClient.Client.SetupRequestinpkg/client/listen/v1/rest/client.gois correct and does not affect other parts of the codebase. All other usages ofSetupRequestremain consistent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of SetupRequest method across the codebase # Test: Search for other occurrences of SetupRequest to ensure consistency rg --type go -e 'SetupRequest' # Test: Check for any remaining instances of c.RESTClient.SetupRequest rg --type go -e 'c\.RESTClient\.SetupRequest'Length of output: 3286
|
thanks @jpvajda for the approve |
Proposed changes
Addresses: #125
Tested
examples.speech-to-text/rest/file. Works as expected now.Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to the community Go SDK?
Put an
xin the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
xin the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.Further comments
NA
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
SetupRequestmethod in multiple client packages to improve traceability.Bug Fixes
DoStreammethod to reflect a new structure in the REST client organization.These changes improve the debugging experience and maintain the overall functionality of the application.