Fix Deadlock, Bumped Interface on WS Clients, Consolidated WS Code #345
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@dvonthenen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Deepgram solution, adding two new projects: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (107)
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IResponseEvent.cs (2)
7-8:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove 'I' prefix from class name.
The 'I' prefix is a C# naming convention specifically for interfaces. Since this is a class, it should be renamed to
ResponseEvent<T>to follow C# naming conventions.-public class IResponseEvent<T> +public class ResponseEvent<T>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public class ResponseEvent<T> {
7-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the class immutable for thread safety.
Given that this class is part of the v2 API designed to fix threading issues, consider making it immutable to ensure thread safety. This can be achieved by:
- Making the property get-only
- Initializing the response through the constructor
public class IResponseEvent<T> { - public T? Response { get; set; } + public T? Response { get; } + + public ResponseEvent(T? response) + { + Response = response; + } }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (1)
7-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the Response property read-only.
The current implementation allows the Response property to be modified after the event is created, which could lead to unexpected behavior in event handlers. Consider making it read-only to ensure immutability:
-public T? Response { get; set; } = response; +public T? Response { get; } = response;This change would:
- Prevent accidental modifications of the response after event creation
- Better align with the event-driven programming pattern where event args are typically immutable
- Make the class thread-safe by design
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public class ResponseEvent<T>(T? response) : EventArgs { public T? Response { get; } = response; }Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (1)
12-14:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd property documentation and implement proper resource management.
The properties need documentation and the
Contentproperty should be properly managed to prevent memory leaks.Apply these improvements:
+ /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets the metadata associated with the file content. + /// </summary> - public Dictionary<string, string> Metadata { get; set; } + public Dictionary<string, string> Metadata { get; set; } = new(); + /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets the file content as a MemoryStream. + /// The caller is responsible for disposing of this stream when no longer needed. + /// </summary> + /// <remarks> + /// This property should be properly disposed of to prevent memory leaks. + /// </remarks> public MemoryStream Content { get; set; } + /// <summary> + /// Releases the resources used by the Content stream. + /// </summary> + public void Dispose() + { + Content?.Dispose(); + }Consider implementing the
IDisposablepattern to ensure proper resource cleanup:-public class LocalFileWithMetadata +public class LocalFileWithMetadata : IDisposableCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakClient.cs (1)
7-16:
⚠️ Potential issueFix XML documentation format.
The documentation block uses incorrect comment format. XML documentation comments should use
///for each line and proper XML tags.Apply this diff to fix the documentation:
-/// <summary> -// *********** WARNING *********** -// This class provides the ISpeakClient implementation for the Deepgram API -// -// Deprecated: This class is deprecated. Use the ISpeakRESTClient interface instead. -// This will be removed in a future release. -// -// This package is frozen and no new functionality will be added. -// *********** WARNING *********** -/// </summary> +/// <summary> +/// *********** WARNING *********** +/// This class provides the ISpeakClient implementation for the Deepgram API +/// +/// Deprecated: This class is deprecated. Use the ISpeakRESTClient interface instead. +/// This will be removed in a future release. +/// +/// This package is frozen and no new functionality will be added. +/// *********** WARNING *********** +/// </summary>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// *********** WARNING *********** /// This class provides the ISpeakClient implementation for the Deepgram API /// /// Deprecated: This class is deprecated. Use the ISpeakRESTClient interface instead. /// This will be removed in a future release. /// /// This package is frozen and no new functionality will be added. /// *********** WARNING *********** /// </summary>Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs (2)
9-14:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove property design and documentation.
Several issues with the
Typeproperty:
- XML documentation incorrectly describes it as "Text of the words to speak"
- Property is nullable despite being set in constructor
- Consider using an enum for control message types
Apply this diff:
/// <summary> - /// Text of the words to speak + /// Gets or sets the type of control message. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] - public string? Type { get; set; } = text; + public string Type { get; set; } = text;Consider creating an enum for control message types:
public enum ControlMessageType { Start, Stop, // Add other control message types }
16-22:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing using directives and improve error handling.
The
ToStringimplementation has several issues:
- Missing using directives for
JsonSerializerandRegex- Undocumented exceptions
- Unclear necessity for
Regex.UnescapeAdd these using directives at the top of the file:
+using System.Text.RegularExpressions; +using System.Text.Json;Update the method documentation:
/// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> + /// <returns>A JSON string representation of the control message.</returns> + /// <exception cref="JsonException">Thrown when serialization fails.</exception> public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> /// <returns>A JSON string representation of the control message.</returns> /// <exception cref="JsonException">Thrown when serialization fails.</exception> public override string ToString() { return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); }Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs (3)
9-11:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect XML documentation.
The XML documentation describes this as an "Open event type" which appears to be incorrect. This property represents the audio response type.
- /// Open event type. + /// The type of speak response, defaults to Audio.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// The type of speak response, defaults to Audio. /// </summary>
17-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance Stream property implementation for thread safety and resource management.
Consider implementing the following improvements:
- Add thread-safe access to prevent potential race conditions during WebSocket operations
- Ensure proper disposal of existing stream when setting a new value
- public MemoryStream? Stream { get; set; } + private MemoryStream? _stream; + public MemoryStream? Stream + { + get => _stream; + set + { + lock (this) + { + _stream?.Dispose(); + _stream = value; + } + } + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// A stream of the audio file /// </summary> private MemoryStream? _stream; public MemoryStream? Stream { get => _stream; set { lock (this) { _stream?.Dispose(); _stream = value; } } }
25-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement the complete dispose pattern.
Since this is a public disposable type that could be inherited, it should either be sealed or implement the full dispose pattern to ensure proper cleanup in derived classes.
Option 1 (Preferred) - Seal the record:
-public record AudioResponse : IDisposable +public sealed record AudioResponse : IDisposableOption 2 - Implement full dispose pattern:
- public void Dispose() - { - Stream?.Dispose(); - } + private bool _disposed; + + protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing) + { + if (!_disposed) + { + if (disposing) + { + Stream?.Dispose(); + } + _disposed = true; + } + } + + public void Dispose() + { + Dispose(true); + GC.SuppressFinalize(this); + }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Search.cs (1)
23-29:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null check and improve documentation for ToString method.
The current implementation could be more robust and better documented.
/// <summary> - /// Override ToString method to serialize the object + /// Converts the Search object to its JSON string representation. /// </summary> + /// <returns>A JSON-formatted string representing the Search object. + /// Null values are omitted from the output.</returns> + /// <exception cref="JsonException">Thrown when serialization fails.</exception> public override string ToString() { + var options = JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions + ?? throw new InvalidOperationException("DefaultOptions not initialized"); - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, options)); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Converts the Search object to its JSON string representation. /// </summary> /// <returns>A JSON-formatted string representing the Search object. /// Null values are omitted from the output.</returns> /// <exception cref="JsonException">Thrown when serialization fails.</exception> public override string ToString() { var options = JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions ?? throw new InvalidOperationException("DefaultOptions not initialized"); return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, options)); }Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs (2)
23-29:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing using statements and consider null handling.
The
ToStringimplementation needs the following improvements:
- Add required using statements
- Consider null handling to avoid potential serialization issues
Apply these changes:
+using System.Text.RegularExpressions; +using System.Text.Json; public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + try + { + return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + } + catch (JsonException) + { + return string.Empty; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.using System.Text.RegularExpressions; using System.Text.Json; /// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> public override string ToString() { try { return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); } catch (JsonException) { return string.Empty; } }
7-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing type safety and documentation.
While the implementation is solid, consider these improvements:
- Use an enum for
Sentimentto restrict values to "Positive", "Negative", or "Neutral"- Add range validation for
SentimentScoreif there are expected bounds- Enhance XML comments with value ranges and examples
Here's a suggested implementation:
+public enum SentimentType +{ + Positive, + Negative, + Neutral +} public record Average { /// <summary> - /// Sentiment: Positive, Negative, or Neutral. + /// The sentiment classification result. + /// </summary> + /// <example> + /// Positive, Negative, or Neutral /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("sentiment")] - public string? Sentiment { get; set; } + public SentimentType? Sentiment { get; set; } /// <summary> - /// Sentiment score. + /// A numerical score indicating the strength of the sentiment. + /// Typically ranges from -1.0 (most negative) to 1.0 (most positive). /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("sentiment_score")] public double? SentimentScore { get; set; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/WebSocketMessage.cs (2)
9-12:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null check for message parameter.
The constructor should validate that the message parameter is not null to prevent NullReferenceException.
public WebSocketMessage(byte[] message, WebSocketMessageType type) : this(message, type, Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend) { + ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(message); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
14-25:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove parameter validation and code clarity.
The constructor needs several improvements for robustness and maintainability:
- Add null check for message parameter
- Simplify the length validation logic
- Make the valid length range more explicit
public WebSocketMessage(byte[] message, WebSocketMessageType type, int length) { + ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(message); + - if (length != Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend && length <= message.Length && length > 0) + int messageLength = length == Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend + ? message.Length + : ValidateAndGetLength(length, message.Length); + + Message = new ArraySegment<byte>(message, 0, messageLength); + MessageType = type; } + +private static int ValidateAndGetLength(int requestedLength, int maxLength) +{ + if (requestedLength <= 0) + throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(requestedLength), "Length must be positive."); + if (requestedLength > maxLength) + throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(requestedLength), $"Length cannot exceed message length of {maxLength}."); + return requestedLength; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public WebSocketMessage(byte[] message, WebSocketMessageType type, int length) { ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(message); int messageLength = length == Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend ? message.Length : ValidateAndGetLength(length, message.Length); Message = new ArraySegment<byte>(message, 0, messageLength); MessageType = type; } private static int ValidateAndGetLength(int requestedLength, int maxLength) { if (requestedLength <= 0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(requestedLength), "Length must be positive."); if (requestedLength > maxLength) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(requestedLength), $"Length cannot exceed message length of {maxLength}."); return requestedLength; }Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/FlushedResponse.cs (2)
24-30:
⚠️ Potential issueReview the ToString implementation for potential issues.
The current implementation has several concerns:
- Using
Regex.Unescapeon JSON might corrupt valid JSON strings- Missing using statement for System.Text.RegularExpressions
- No error handling for serialization failures
+using System.Text.RegularExpressions; public record FlushedResponse { // ... other members ... /// <summary> - /// Override ToString method to serialize the object + /// Converts the response to its JSON string representation. + /// </summary> + /// <returns>A JSON string representation of the response.</returns> + /// <exception cref="JsonException">Thrown when serialization fails.</exception> /// </summary> public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Converts the response to its JSON string representation. /// </summary> /// <returns>A JSON string representation of the response.</returns> /// <exception cref="JsonException">Thrown when serialization fails.</exception> public override string ToString() { return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); }
7-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the record definition and Type property.
- Mark the record as
sealedfor better performance since it's not designed for inheritance.- Enhance the XML documentation to better describe the purpose of this response type.
- Since the Type is always
SpeakType.Flushed, consider making it non-nullable.-public record FlushedResponse +/// <summary> +/// Represents a response indicating that all pending audio data has been flushed in the WebSocket stream. +/// This response is sent when the server has processed and transmitted all queued audio data. +/// </summary> +public sealed record FlushedResponse { /// <summary> - /// Flush event type. + /// The type of the speak event. Always set to SpeakType.Flushed for this response. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] [JsonConverter(typeof(JsonStringEnumConverter))] - public SpeakType? Type { get; set; } = SpeakType.Flushed; + public SpeakType Type { get; init; } = SpeakType.Flushed;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Represents a response indicating that all pending audio data has been flushed in the WebSocket stream. /// This response is sent when the server has processed and transmitted all queued audio data. /// </summary> public sealed record FlushedResponse { /// <summary> /// The type of the speak event. Always set to SpeakType.Flushed for this response. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] [JsonConverter(typeof(JsonStringEnumConverter))] public SpeakType Type { get; init; } = SpeakType.Flushed;Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Channel.cs (1)
23-29:
⚠️ Potential issueSimplify ToString implementation and add null check
The current implementation has several potential issues:
Regex.Unescapeis unnecessary for JSON serialization and could potentially corrupt valid JSON strings- Missing using directive for
System.Text.RegularExpressions- No null check on the serialization result
+using System.Text.RegularExpressions; public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + var json = JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); + return json ?? string.Empty; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.using System.Text.RegularExpressions; /// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> public override string ToString() { var json = JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); return json ?? string.Empty; }Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs (2)
17-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using record's built-in copy constructor instead of explicit Copy method.
Since this is a record type, C# provides built-in copy construction with the
withexpression. This would be more idiomatic and less error-prone.Consider this alternative approach:
- /// <summary> - /// Copy method to copy the object - /// </summary> - public void Copy(OpenResponse other) - { - if (other == null) - { - return; - } - - Type = other.Type; - } + /// <summary> + /// Creates a new instance with the specified type. + /// </summary> + /// <param name="type">The WebSocket event type.</param> + /// <returns>A new instance of OpenResponse with the specified type.</returns> + public OpenResponse WithType(WebSocketType? type) => this with { Type = type };Usage example:
var newResponse = existingResponse.WithType(WebSocketType.Open);
30-36:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing using statements for JsonSerializer and Regex.
The code references
JsonSerializer,JsonSerializeOptions, andRegexbut the required using statements are missing.Add these using statements at the top of the file:
+using System.Text.RegularExpressions; +using System.Text.Json; +using System.Text.Json.Serialization;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/SpeechStartedResponse.cs (2)
7-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making Type property non-nullable
Since this record specifically represents a speech started event, and Type has a default value of
ListenType.SpeechStarted, consider making it non-nullable. This would better express the intent and reduce unnecessary complexity.- public ListenType? Type { get; set; } = ListenType.SpeechStarted; + public ListenType Type { get; init; } = ListenType.SpeechStarted;Also consider using
initinstead ofsetsince this is a record type, promoting immutability.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public record SpeechStartedResponse { /// <summary> /// SpeechStarted event type. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] [JsonConverter(typeof(JsonStringEnumConverter))] public ListenType Type { get; init; } = ListenType.SpeechStarted;
7-38: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure thread safety in WebSocket context
Given that this record is used in a WebSocket context and the PR aims to fix deadlock issues:
- Consider making all properties immutable using
initinstead ofset- Add the
readonlymodifier to the record declaration-public record SpeechStartedResponse +public readonly record SpeechStartedResponse { - public ListenType? Type { get; set; } = ListenType.SpeechStarted; + public ListenType Type { get; init; } = ListenType.SpeechStarted; - public int[]? Channel { get; set; } + public IReadOnlyList<int>? ChannelIndices { get; init; } - public decimal? Timestamp { get; set; } + public decimal? Timestamp { get; init; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public readonly record SpeechStartedResponse { /// <summary> /// SpeechStarted event type. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] [JsonConverter(typeof(JsonStringEnumConverter))] public ListenType Type { get; init; } = ListenType.SpeechStarted; /// <summary> /// Channel index information /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("channel_index")] public IReadOnlyList<int>? ChannelIndices { get; init; } /// <summary> /// Timestamp of the event. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("timestamp")] public decimal? Timestamp { get; init; } /// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> public override string ToString() { return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); } }Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UtteranceEndResponse.cs (1)
31-37:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks and error handling to ToString implementation.
The current implementation might throw exceptions if
JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptionsis null, and the use ofRegex.Unescapemight be unnecessary depending on the serialization options.Consider adding null checks and error handling:
public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + try + { + var options = JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions ?? new JsonSerializerOptions(); + return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, options); + } + catch (JsonException ex) + { + return $"{{\"error\": \"Failed to serialize {nameof(UtteranceEndResponse)}: {ex.Message}\"}}"; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> public override string ToString() { try { var options = JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions ?? new JsonSerializerOptions(); return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, options); } catch (JsonException ex) { return $"{{\"error\": \"Failed to serialize {nameof(UtteranceEndResponse)}: {ex.Message}\"}}"; } }Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs (4)
7-14:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove default empty string from nullable Raw property.
The default empty string value contradicts the nullable design and prevents
JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNullfrom working as expected. It's better to let it default tonullto maintain consistency with the nullable design.- public string? Raw { get; set; } = ""; + public string? Raw { get; set; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public record UnhandledResponse { /// <summary> /// Raw JSON /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("raw")] public string? Raw { get; set; }
24-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing custom Copy method in favor of record's built-in copy constructor.
C# records already provide built-in copy functionality through the
withexpression. If custom copying is needed, consider these improvements:
- Add XML documentation for the parameter
- Add null validation for individual property values
- Return the modified instance for method chaining
Alternative approach (Recommended):
- public void Copy(UnhandledResponse other) - { - if (other == null) - { - return; - } - - Raw = other.Raw; - Type = other.Type; - } // Usage: var copy = original with { Raw = "new value" };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
38-44:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance ToString method robustness.
The current implementation could be improved to handle edge cases and errors:
public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + try + { + var json = JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); + return string.IsNullOrEmpty(json) ? string.Empty : Regex.Unescape(json); + } + catch (JsonException ex) + { + return $"{{\"error\": \"Failed to serialize: {ex.Message}\"}}"; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> public override string ToString() { try { var json = JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); return string.IsNullOrEmpty(json) ? string.Empty : Regex.Unescape(json); } catch (JsonException ex) { return $"{{\"error\": \"Failed to serialize: {ex.Message}\"}}"; } }
16-22:
⚠️ Potential issueResolve conflict between nullable Type and default value.
The property is marked nullable but has a default value, making the nullable annotation redundant and preventing
JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNullfrom working. Choose one of these approaches:Option 1 (Recommended) - If Type should always have a value:
- public WebSocketType? Type { get; set; } = WebSocketType.Unhandled; + public WebSocketType Type { get; set; } = WebSocketType.Unhandled;Option 2 - If Type should be nullable:
- public WebSocketType? Type { get; set; } = WebSocketType.Unhandled; + public WebSocketType? Type { get; set; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Unhandled event type. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] [JsonConverter(typeof(JsonStringEnumConverter))] public WebSocketType Type { get; set; } = WebSocketType.Unhandled; ``` Option 2: ```suggestion /// <summary> /// Unhandled event type. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] [JsonConverter(typeof(JsonStringEnumConverter))] public WebSocketType? Type { get; set; }Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Hit.cs (2)
38-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve ToString implementation robustness.
The current implementation has a few potential issues:
- Unnecessary use of
Regex.UnescapeasJsonSerializeralready handles escaping- Missing exception handling for serialization errors
- No XML documentation for the return value
/// <summary> - /// Override ToString method to serialize the object + /// Converts the Hit object to its JSON string representation. /// </summary> + /// <returns>A JSON string representation of the Hit object, or an error message if serialization fails.</returns> public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + try + { + return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); + } + catch (JsonException ex) + { + return $"Error serializing Hit: {ex.Message}"; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Converts the Hit object to its JSON string representation. /// </summary> /// <returns>A JSON string representation of the Hit object, or an error message if serialization fails.</returns> public override string ToString() { try { return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); } catch (JsonException ex) { return $"Error serializing Hit: {ex.Message}"; } }
7-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding property validation.
The
StartandEndproperties represent time offsets but lack validation to ensureStartis less thanEnd. Consider implementing validation either through a constructor or property setters.public record Hit { + private decimal? start; + private decimal? end; + // ... other properties ... [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("end")] - public decimal? End { get; set; } + public decimal? End + { + get => end; + set + { + if (start.HasValue && value.HasValue && value < start) + { + throw new ArgumentException("End time cannot be less than Start time"); + } + end = value; + } + } [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("start")] - public decimal? Start { get; set; } + public decimal? Start + { + get => start; + set + { + if (end.HasValue && value.HasValue && value > end) + { + throw new ArgumentException("Start time cannot be greater than End time"); + } + start = value; + } + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public record Hit { private decimal? start; private decimal? end; /// <summary> /// Value between 0 and 1 that indicates the model's relative confidence in this hit. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("confidence")] public double? Confidence { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Offset in seconds from the start of the audio to where the hit ends. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("end")] public decimal? End { get => end; set { if (start.HasValue && value.HasValue && value < start) { throw new ArgumentException("End time cannot be less than Start time"); } end = value; } } /// <summary> /// Transcript that corresponds to the time between start and end. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("snippet")] public string? Snippet { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Offset in seconds from the start of the audio to where the hit occurs. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("start")] public decimal? Start { get => start; set { if (end.HasValue && value.HasValue && value > end) { throw new ArgumentException("Start time cannot be greater than End time"); } start = value; } }Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Alternative.cs (2)
5-5:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing using directives.
The following imports are required but missing:
System.Text.Jsonfor JsonSerializerSystem.Text.RegularExpressionsfor RegexAdd these imports at the beginning of the file:
+using System.Text.Json; +using System.Text.RegularExpressions; namespace Deepgram.Models.Listen.v2.WebSocket;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.using System.Text.Json; using System.Text.RegularExpressions; namespace Deepgram.Models.Listen.v2.WebSocket;
19-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding validation for Confidence property.
The confidence value should be between 0 and 1 as per the documentation, but there's no validation to ensure this constraint.
Consider adding a property setter validation:
[JsonPropertyName("confidence")] - public double? Confidence { get; set; } + public double? Confidence + { + get => _confidence; + set + { + if (value.HasValue && (value.Value < 0 || value.Value > 1)) + { + throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value), "Confidence must be between 0 and 1"); + } + _confidence = value; + } + } + private double? _confidence;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.[JsonPropertyName("confidence")] public double? Confidence { get => _confidence; set { if (value.HasValue && (value.Value < 0 || value.Value > 1)) { throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value), "Confidence must be between 0 and 1"); } _confidence = value; } } private double? _confidence;Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Metadata.cs (4)
23-28:
⚠️ Potential issueFix the XML documentation reference for ModelInfo.
The XML documentation refers to
<see cref="ModelInfo"/>, but ModelInfo appears to be a property type rather than a separate type that can be referenced.- /// IReadonlyDictionary of <see cref="ModelInfo"/> + /// Model information containing details about the model used📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Model information containing details about the model used /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("model_info")] public ModelInfo? ModelInfo { get; set; }
42-45:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove ToString implementation robustness.
The current implementation has several potential issues:
- Unnecessary use of
Regex.Unescapewhich could cause issues with special characters- No error handling for serialization failures
Consider this safer implementation:
- public override string ToString() - { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); - } + public override string ToString() + { + try + { + return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); + } + catch (JsonException ex) + { + return $"{{\"error\": \"Failed to serialize metadata: {ex.Message}\"}}"; + } + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public override string ToString() { try { return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); } catch (JsonException ex) { return $"{{\"error\": \"Failed to serialize metadata: {ex.Message}\"}}"; } }
7-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the record immutable for better encapsulation.
Since this is a data transfer object representing metadata, it should be immutable. Consider using init-only properties or constructor initialization.
-public record MetaData +public sealed record MetaData { - public string? RequestId { get; set; } + public string? RequestId { get; init; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
1-46: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
MetaData class integration appears incomplete in v2 WebSocket implementation
The verification reveals some concerns:
- The v2 WebSocket client implementation directory (
Deepgram/Clients/Live/v2/) is missing- While the MetaData class is properly defined and used in ResultResponse v2, the corresponding client implementation is not yet available
- Test coverage shows commented-out tests for metadata handling
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify integration with WebSocket client implementation.
Since this is part of the v2 WebSocket implementation addressing deadlock issues, let's verify its integration with the WebSocket client.
Let me gather more specific information about the integration.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the complete integration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the MetaData class in WebSocket clients echo "Searching for MetaData usage in WebSocket clients..." rg -l "MetaData" --type cs # Search for specific patterns of metadata handling in WebSocket implementations echo "Checking metadata handling patterns..." ast-grep --pattern 'new MetaData { $$ }'Length of output: 602
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how MetaData is used in ResultResponse and Client implementations echo "Checking ResultResponse v2 implementation..." rg -A 10 "MetaData" Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs echo "\nChecking WebSocket client implementation..." rg -A 10 "MetaData" Deepgram/Clients/Live/v1/Client.cs # Look for any potential deadlock-related fixes in v2 echo "\nChecking for async/await patterns in v2..." rg -A 5 "async|await" Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Length of output: 1686
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for the v2 WebSocket client implementation echo "Searching for v2 WebSocket client..." fd -e cs . Deepgram/Clients/Live/v2/ # Check for any test coverage of the MetaData class in v2 echo "\nChecking test coverage..." rg -A 10 "MetaData" Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/LiveClientTests.cs # Look for any configuration or setup related to MetaData in v2 echo "\nChecking for metadata configuration..." rg -A 5 "Configure|Setup.*Meta" Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/Length of output: 1663
Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (1)
7-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving property defaults and documentation.
- The default empty strings (
"") for nullable properties could be misleading. Consider usingnullas the default since these properties are nullable and haveJsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull.- The XML documentation could be more descriptive to help API consumers.
Here's the suggested improvement:
public record ErrorResponse { /// <summary> - /// Error Description + /// A detailed description of the error that occurred during WebSocket communication. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("description")] - public string? Description { get; set; } = ""; + public string? Description { get; set; } = null; /// <summary> - /// Error Message + /// A brief message describing the error condition. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("message")] - public string? Message { get; set; } = ""; + public string? Message { get; set; } = null; /// <summary> - /// Error Variant + /// Specifies the variant or category of the error for more specific error handling. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("variant")] - public string? Variant { get; set; } = ""; + public string? Variant { get; set; } = null;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public record ErrorResponse { /// <summary> /// A detailed description of the error that occurred during WebSocket communication. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("description")] public string? Description { get; set; } = null; /// <summary> /// A brief message describing the error condition. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("message")] public string? Message { get; set; } = null; /// <summary> /// Specifies the variant or category of the error for more specific error handling. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("variant")] public string? Variant { get; set; } = null; /// <summary> /// Error event type. /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] [JsonConverter(typeof(JsonStringEnumConverter))] public WebSocketType? Type { get; set; } = WebSocketType.Error;Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakRESTClient.cs (1)
9-14:
⚠️ Potential issueFix interface documentation.
The XML documentation appears to be copied from a class implementation:
- It incorrectly states "Implements version 1" when this is a v2 interface
- Contains constructor parameter documentation which isn't applicable to an interface
Apply this diff to fix the documentation:
/// <summary> -/// Implements version 1 of the Speak Client. +/// Interface for version 2 of the Speak REST Client. /// </summary> -/// <param name="apiKey">Required DeepgramApiKey</param> -/// <param name="deepgramClientOptions"><see cref="DeepgramHttpClientOptions"/> for HttpClient Configuration</param>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Interface for version 2 of the Speak REST Client. /// </summary> public interface ISpeakRESTClientDeepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/SpeakSchema.cs (1)
31-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use enum instead of string for Encoding property.
Since there's a fixed set of supported encodings (referenced as
AudioEncoding), consider using an enum instead of string to ensure type safety and prevent invalid values.Convert to enum-based property:
+ public enum AudioEncoding + { + [JsonPropertyName("linear16")] + Linear16, + [JsonPropertyName("mulaw")] + MuLaw, + // Add other supported encodings + } /// <summary> /// Encoding allows you to specify the expected encoding of your submitted audio. /// <see href="https://developers.deepgram.com/docs/encoding"> - /// supported encodings <see cref="AudioEncoding"/> + /// Supported encodings are defined in <see cref="AudioEncoding"/> /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("encoding")] - public string? Encoding { get; set; } + public AudioEncoding? Encoding { get; set; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Word.cs (3)
30-35:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd validation for the Confidence property.
The confidence value should be between 0 and 1, but there's no validation to ensure this constraint.
Consider adding a validation method or using a custom JsonConverter:
private double? confidence; [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("confidence")] public double? Confidence { get => confidence; init { if (value.HasValue && (value.Value < 0 || value.Value > 1)) { throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value), "Confidence must be between 0 and 1"); } confidence = value; } }
7-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making properties immutable for the record type.
The record type is typically used for immutable data. Consider changing the properties to init-only setters.
-public record Word +public sealed record WordCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
58-64: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize ToString implementation.
The current implementation has a few issues:
- Missing using statement for
System.Text.RegularExpressionsRegex.Unescapemight be unnecessary and could affect performance+using System.Text.RegularExpressions; public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Utilities.cs (3)
39-45:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd stream validation and proper resource handling
The method needs additional validation and safety checks:
- Missing null check for the stream parameter
- No validation that the stream is readable and seekable
- Potential resource leak if StreamContent creation fails
internal static HttpContent CreateStreamPayload(Stream body) { + ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(body); + if (!body.CanRead || !body.CanSeek) + { + throw new ArgumentException("Stream must be readable and seekable", nameof(body)); + } + body.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin); - HttpContent httpContent = new StreamContent(body); - httpContent.Headers.Add("Content-Length", body.Length.ToString()); - return httpContent; + try + { + var httpContent = new StreamContent(body); + httpContent.Headers.Add("Content-Length", body.Length.ToString()); + return httpContent; + } + catch + { + body.Dispose(); + throw; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.internal static HttpContent CreateStreamPayload(Stream body) { ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(body); if (!body.CanRead || !body.CanSeek) { throw new ArgumentException("Stream must be readable and seekable", nameof(body)); } body.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin); try { var httpContent = new StreamContent(body); httpContent.Headers.Add("Content-Length", body.Length.ToString()); return httpContent; } catch { body.Dispose(); throw; } }
20-31:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd parameter validation and error handling
The method needs some improvements:
- The documentation mentions a
contentTypeparameter that doesn't exist- Missing null check for the
bodyparameter- No exception handling for serialization failures
/// <summary> /// Create the body payload of a HttpRequestMessage /// </summary> /// <typeparam name="T">Type of the body to be sent</typeparam> /// <param name="body">instance value for the body</param> -/// <param name="contentType">What type of content is being sent default is : application/json</param> /// <returns></returns> internal static StringContent CreatePayload<T>(T body) { + ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(body); + try + { var serialized = JsonSerializer.Serialize(body, _jsonSerializerOptions); return new(serialized, Encoding.UTF8, DEFAULT_CONTENT_TYPE); + } + catch (JsonException ex) + { + throw new ArgumentException("Failed to serialize the body", nameof(body), ex); + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Create the body payload of a HttpRequestMessage /// </summary> /// <typeparam name="T">Type of the body to be sent</typeparam> /// <param name="body">instance value for the body</param> /// <returns></returns> internal static StringContent CreatePayload<T>(T body) { ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(body); try { var serialized = JsonSerializer.Serialize(body, _jsonSerializerOptions); return new(serialized, Encoding.UTF8, DEFAULT_CONTENT_TYPE); } catch (JsonException ex) { throw new ArgumentException("Failed to serialize the body", nameof(body), ex); } }
54-59:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling and implement promised null checks
The method needs several improvements:
- Missing null check for httpResponseMessage parameter
- No error handling for deserialization failures
- No validation of response content
- Documentation promises null checks but none are implemented
internal static async Task<TResponse> DeserializeAsync<TResponse>(HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage) { + ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(httpResponseMessage); + var content = await httpResponseMessage.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(); - var deepgramResponse = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<TResponse>(content); - return deepgramResponse; + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(content)) + { + throw new InvalidOperationException("Response content is empty"); + } + + try + { + var deepgramResponse = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<TResponse>(content, _jsonSerializerOptions); + return deepgramResponse ?? throw new InvalidOperationException("Deserialized response is null"); + } + catch (JsonException ex) + { + throw new InvalidOperationException("Failed to deserialize response content", ex); + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.internal static async Task<TResponse> DeserializeAsync<TResponse>(HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage) { ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(httpResponseMessage); var content = await httpResponseMessage.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(); if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(content)) { throw new InvalidOperationException("Response content is empty"); } try { var deepgramResponse = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<TResponse>(content, _jsonSerializerOptions); return deepgramResponse ?? throw new InvalidOperationException("Deserialized response is null"); } catch (JsonException ex) { throw new InvalidOperationException("Failed to deserialize response content", ex); } }Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISelfHostedClient.cs (3)
21-22:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace CancellationTokenSource with CancellationToken
Using CancellationTokenSource in method parameters is not a common practice. Methods should accept CancellationToken instead, letting the caller manage the source.
Apply this change to all method signatures. Example for ListCredentials:
-public Task<CredentialsResponse> ListCredentials(string projectId, CancellationTokenSource? cancellationToken = default, +public Task<CredentialsResponse> ListCredentials(string projectId, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default, Dictionary<string, string>? addons = null, Dictionary<string, string>? headers = null);Also applies to: 30-31, 39-40, 48-49
46-46:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate parameter documentation to match naming
The XML documentation refers to
createOnPremCredentialsSchemabut the parameter is namedcredentialsSchema.-/// <param name="createOnPremCredentialsSchema"><see cref="CredentialsSchema"/> for credentials to be created</param> +/// <param name="credentialsSchema"><see cref="CredentialsSchema"/> for credentials to be created</param>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <param name="credentialsSchema"><see cref="CredentialsSchema"/> for credentials to be created</param>
9-11:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate XML documentation to match v2 versioning
The documentation mentions "version 1 of the OnPrem Client" but this interface is in the v2 namespace.
-/// Implements version 1 of the OnPrem Client. +/// Implements version 2 of the Self-Hosted Client.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Implements version 2 of the Self-Hosted Client. /// </summary>Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ILiveClient.cs (1)
22-72: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider alternative design to method overloading.
The current design uses method overloading which might be confusing for consumers and makes it harder to unsubscribe from specific events. Consider a more explicit approach.
Alternative design:
public interface ILiveClient : IListenWebSocketClient { public Task<bool> SubscribeToOpen(EventHandler<OpenResponse> eventHandler); public Task<bool> SubscribeToMetadata(EventHandler<MetadataResponse> eventHandler); public Task<bool> SubscribeToResults(EventHandler<ResultResponse> eventHandler); // ... similar methods for other events }This approach:
- Makes the API more explicit and discoverable
- Allows for easier unsubscription implementation
- Reduces potential confusion about which overload to use
Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs (2)
73-77:
⚠️ Potential issueAddress TODO and improve error handling implementation.
Several concerns with the current error handling approach:
- The TODO comment needs to be resolved before merging
- Using raw
Exceptiontype could lead to serialization issues- Missing JSON serialization attributes unlike other properties
Consider implementing a dedicated error model:
- // TODO: DYV is this needed??? - /// <summary> - /// Error information. - /// </summary> - public Exception? Error { get; set; } + /// <summary> + /// Contains error information if the WebSocket response indicates a failure. + /// </summary> + [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] + [JsonPropertyName("error")] + public WebSocketError? Error { get; set; }And create a new error model:
public record WebSocketError { [JsonPropertyName("code")] public string Code { get; init; } = string.Empty; [JsonPropertyName("message")] public string Message { get; init; } = string.Empty; }
82-85:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary Regex.Unescape call in ToString.
The
Regex.Unescapecall is unnecessary and could potentially cause issues sinceJsonSerializeralready handles proper string escaping.- return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public override string ToString() { return JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions); }Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/MetadataResponse.cs (3)
82-88:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling to ToString implementation.
The current implementation might throw exceptions during serialization. Consider adding error handling to make it more robust.
public override string ToString() { - return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); + try + { + return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, + JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions ?? JsonSerializerOptions.Default)); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + return $"Error serializing {GetType().Name}: {ex.Message}"; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> public override string ToString() { try { return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions ?? JsonSerializerOptions.Default)); } catch (Exception ex) { return $"Error serializing {GetType().Name}: {ex.Message}"; } }
73-80:
⚠️ Potential issueConsider adding validation for Extra metadata size limit.
The documentation mentions a 2048-character limit per key-value pair in Extra metadata, but this constraint isn't enforced in the code. Consider adding validation to ensure compliance with this limit.
Here's a suggested implementation:
public Dictionary<string, string>? Extra { get => _extra; set { if (value != null) { foreach (var kvp in value) { if (kvp.Key.Length + kvp.Value.Length > 2048) { throw new ArgumentException($"Extra metadata key-value pair '{kvp.Key}' exceeds 2048 character limit"); } } } _extra = value; } } private Dictionary<string, string>? _extra;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
73-80: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using IReadOnlyDictionary for Extra property.
For consistency with the ModelInfo property and to prevent unintended modifications, consider using IReadOnlyDictionary for the Extra property as well.
-public Dictionary<string, string>? Extra { get; set; } +public IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string>? Extra { get; set; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Deepgram's Extra Metadata feature allows you to attach arbitrary key-value pairs to your API requests that are attached to the API response for usage in downstream processing. /// Extra metadata is limited to 2048 characters per key-value pair. /// <see href="https://developers.deepgram.com/docs/extra-metadata"/> /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("extra")] public IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string>? Extra { get; set; }Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs (2)
87-106:
⚠️ Potential issueClean up commented code and clarify method purposes.
There are several commented-out method declarations that should either be removed or implemented. Additionally, the distinction between
Send,SendMessage, and the commented-outSendBinarymethods is unclear.
- Remove or implement the commented-out methods.
- Consider renaming methods to better reflect their purposes:
-public void Send(byte[] data, int length = Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend); +public void SendBinaryData(byte[] data, int length = Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend); -public void SendMessage(byte[] data, int length = Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend); +public void SendTextData(byte[] data, int length = Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend);Also applies to: 119-133
9-11:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect interface documentation.
The XML documentation incorrectly states "Implements version 1 of the Live Client" but this is a v2 interface for the Speak WebSocket client.
Update the documentation to:
/// <summary> -/// Implements version 1 of the Live Client. +/// Interface for version 2 of the Speak WebSocket client. /// </summary>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Interface for version 2 of the Speak WebSocket client. /// </summary>Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/LiveSchema.cs (3)
70-77: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using enum for Encoding property.
The Encoding property references AudioEncoding in the documentation but accepts any string. Consider using an enum to constrain valid values.
public enum AudioEncoding { [JsonPropertyName("linear16")] Linear16, [JsonPropertyName("mulaw")] MuLaw, // Add other supported encodings } [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("encoding")] public AudioEncoding? Encoding { get; set; }
53-59:
⚠️ Potential issueFix malformed XML documentation comment.
The XML documentation comment is missing an opening
<summary>tag.- // <summary> + /// <summary>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// <see href="https://developers.deepgram.com/docs/diarization"> /// default is null, only applies if Diarize is set to true /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("diarize_version")] public string? DiarizeVersion { get; set; }
231-237:
⚠️ Potential issueProperty name mismatch with documentation.
The JsonPropertyName "utterance_end_ms" doesn't match the property name "UtteranceEnd". This could cause confusion. Consider renaming the property to match the API parameter name.
- public string? UtteranceEnd { get; set; } + public string? UtteranceEndMs { get; set; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Indicates how long Deepgram will wait to send a {"type": "UtteranceEnd"} message after a word has been transcribed /// <see href="https://developers.deepgram.com/docs/understanding-end-of-speech-detection-while-streaming"/> /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("utterance_end_ms")] public string? UtteranceEndMs { get; set; }Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs (2)
9-14:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent interface documentation and incorrect XML comments.
The XML documentation for the interface
IListenRESTClientis inconsistent and contains errors:
- The summary states "Implements version 1 of the Analyze Client," which does not match the interface name
IListenRESTClientor the versionv2.<param>tags are used, but interfaces do not have parameters. These tags are inappropriate in this context.
21-23:
⚠️ Potential issueFix improperly formatted XML documentation
<see>tags.The
<see>tags in the XML documentation comments are not properly closed. They should be self-closing tags ending with a/. For example:
- Line 21:
<see cref="UrlSource">should be<see cref="UrlSource"/>.- Line 53:
<see cref="PreRecordedSchema">should be<see cref="PreRecordedSchema"/>.This issue occurs in multiple places:
- Lines 21, 31, 39, 53, 62, 74
Please review and correct these to ensure proper XML documentation.
Also applies to: 31-33, 39-42, 53-55, 62-66, 74-77
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs (5)
15-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use
CancellationTokeninstead ofCancellationTokenSourcein method signaturesIt's recommended to accept
CancellationTokenparameters rather thanCancellationTokenSourcein asynchronous methods. This allows callers to control cancellation without exposing the token source.Apply this diff to update the method signatures:
-public Task Connect(LiveSchema options, CancellationTokenSource? cancelToken = null, Dictionary<string, string>? addons = null, +public Task Connect(LiveSchema options, CancellationToken? cancellationToken = null, Dictionary<string, string>? addons = null,-public Task Stop(CancellationTokenSource? cancelToken = null, bool nullByte = false); +public Task Stop(CancellationToken? cancellationToken = null, bool nullByte = false);Ensure to update all references to
cancelTokenwithin the implementation to usecancellationToken.Also applies to: 18-18
92-93:
⚠️ Potential issueInclude missing parameter descriptions in XML documentation
The methods have a
lengthparameter that is not documented in the XML comments. Please add<param>tags for thelengthparameter with appropriate descriptions.Apply this diff to add parameter descriptions:
/// <param name="data">The data to be sent over the WebSocket.</param> +/// <param name="length">The number of bytes from the data to send. Use `Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend` to send the entire array.</param>Repeat this change for the following methods:
SendSendBinarySendMessageSendBinaryImmediatelySendMessageImmediatelyAlso applies to: 98-99, 104-105, 108-109, 112-114
2-2:
⚠️ Potential issueTypographical correction in license text
The phrase "governed by a MIT license" should be "governed by an MIT license" for correct grammar.
Apply this diff to fix the typographical error:
-// Use of this source code is governed by a MIT license that can be found in the LICENSE file. +// Use of this source code is governed by an MIT license that can be found in the LICENSE file.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Use of this source code is governed by an MIT license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
10-10:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate summary to reflect version 2
The summary states "Implements version 1 of the Live Client," but the interface is in the
v2namespace. Update the comment to accurately reflect version 2.Apply this diff to correct the summary:
-/// Implements version 1 of the Live Client. +/// Implements version 2 of the Live Client.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// Implements version 2 of the Live Client.
121-122: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider defining
Stateas a property instead of a methodSince
Staterepresents the current state of the WebSocket and does not perform an action, it may be more appropriate to implement it as a property.Apply this diff to change
Stateto a property:-public WebSocketState State(); +public WebSocketState State { get; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <returns>Returns the connection state of the WebSocket</returns> public WebSocketState State { get; }Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IAnalyzeClient.cs (5)
15-16:
⚠️ Potential issueFix self-closing tags in XML documentation
The
<see cref="...">tags in the XML documentation comments should be self-closed with/>to conform to XML documentation standards and prevent documentation build issues.Apply this diff to correct the tags:
-/// <param name="source">Url to the file that is to be analyzed <see cref="UrlSource"></param> +/// <param name="source">Url to the file that is to be analyzed <see cref="UrlSource"/></param> -/// <param name="analyzeSchema">Options for the transcription <see cref="AnalyzeSchema"></param> +/// <param name="analyzeSchema">Options for the transcription <see cref="AnalyzeSchema"/></param>Also applies to: 24-25, 33-34, 42-43, 54-55, 65-66, 75-76, 85-87
18-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider accepting 'CancellationToken' instead of 'CancellationTokenSource'
Methods typically accept a
CancellationTokenparameter rather than aCancellationTokenSource. This approach allows callers to pass existing cancellation tokens and aligns with common .NET practices.Apply this diff to update the parameters:
-public Task<SyncResponse> AnalyzeUrl(UrlSource source, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, CancellationTokenSource? cancellationToken = default, +public Task<SyncResponse> AnalyzeUrl(UrlSource source, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default, -public Task<SyncResponse> AnalyzeText(TextSource source, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, CancellationTokenSource? cancellationToken = default, +public Task<SyncResponse> AnalyzeText(TextSource source, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default, // Apply similar changes to other method signaturesAlso applies to: 27-27, 35-35, 44-44, 56-56, 67-67, 78-78, 89-89
56-58: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use consistent naming for 'Callback' in method names and parameters
The term 'Callback' should be consistently spelled as a single word in method names and parameter names. Update 'CallBack' to 'Callback' to follow standard C# naming conventions.
Apply this diff to rename the methods and parameters:
-public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeFileCallBack(byte[] source, string? callBack, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, +public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeFileCallback(byte[] source, string? callback, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, -public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeFileCallBack(Stream source, string? callBack, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, +public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeFileCallback(Stream source, string? callback, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, -public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeUrlCallBack(UrlSource source, string? callBack, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, +public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeUrlCallback(UrlSource source, string? callback, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, -public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeTextCallBack(TextSource source, string? callBack, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, +public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeTextCallback(TextSource source, string? callback, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, // Also update parameter names: -/// <param name="callBack">CallBack url</param> +/// <param name="callback">Callback URL</param>Also applies to: 67-69, 78-80, 89-89
85-85:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect reference in XML documentation
In the
<see cref="..."/>tag, changeUrlSourcetoTextSourceto accurately reflect the parameter type.Apply this diff:
-/// <param name="source">Text that is to be analyzed <see cref="UrlSource"/></param> +/// <param name="source">Text that is to be analyzed <see cref="TextSource"/></param>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <param name="source">Text that is to be analyzed <see cref="TextSource"/></param>
82-82:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect XML documentation comment syntax
The comment should use triple slashes to denote XML documentation. Change
// <summary>to/// <summary>.Apply this diff:
-// <summary> +/// <summary>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary>Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs (9)
69-81: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider returning a common interface instead of
objectReturning
objectdiminishes type safety. If possible, define a common interface that bothListenV1.ClientandListenV2.Clientimplement, and use it as the return type.
69-81:
⚠️ Potential issueUnused parameter
httpIdinCreateListenWebSocketClientThe parameter
httpIdis not used within the method and should be removed to avoid confusion.Apply this diff to remove the unused parameter:
-public static object CreateListenWebSocketClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramWsClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) +public static object CreateListenWebSocketClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramWsClientOptions? options = null)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static object CreateListenWebSocketClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramWsClientOptions? options = null) { // at some point this needs to be changed to use reflection to get the type of the client switch(version) { case 1: return new ListenV1.Client(apiKey, options); case 2: return new ListenV2.Client(apiKey, options); default: throw new ArgumentException("Invalid version", nameof(version)); } }
66-68:
⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect method summary in
CreateListenWebSocketClientThe XML documentation incorrectly states that this method creates an
AnalyzeClient. It should referenceListenWebSocketClient.Apply this diff to correct the summary:
-/// This method allows you to create an AnalyzeClient with a specific version of the client. +/// This method allows you to create a ListenWebSocketClient with a specific version of the client.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// This method allows you to create a ListenWebSocketClient with a specific version of the client. /// </summary>
229-241:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent parameter type in
CreateSpeakWebSocketClientThe method
CreateSpeakWebSocketClientacceptsDeepgramHttpClientOptions? options, but it should acceptDeepgramWsClientOptions? optionsto match the WebSocket client context.Apply this diff:
-public static object CreateSpeakWebSocketClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) +public static object CreateSpeakWebSocketClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramWsClientOptions? options = null)And update the method implementation accordingly.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
135-140:
⚠️ Potential issueReturn type should be more specific in
CreateSelfHostedClientReturning
objectdiminishes type safety. ReturnV1.ISelfHostedClientinstead to maintain consistency and avoid unnecessary casting.Apply this diff:
-public static object CreateSelfHostedClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) +public static V1.ISelfHostedClient CreateSelfHostedClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static V1.ISelfHostedClient CreateSelfHostedClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) { // Currently only a single version of the SelfHostedClient exists return new SelfHostedClient(apiKey, options, httpId); }
209-212:
⚠️ Potential issueReturn type should be more specific in
CreateSpeakRESTClientReturning
objectdiminishes type safety. ReturnV1.ISpeakRESTClientinstead to improve code quality.Apply this diff:
-public static object CreateSpeakRESTClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) +public static V1.ISpeakRESTClient CreateSpeakRESTClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static V1.ISpeakRESTClient CreateSpeakRESTClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) { // Currently only a single version of the SpeakRESTClient exists return new SpeakRESTClient(apiKey, options, httpId);
30-37:
⚠️ Potential issueReturn type should be more specific in
CreateAnalyzeClientReturning
objectreduces type safety and requires users to perform type casting. Since only one version exists, consider returningV1.IAnalyzeClientdirectly.Apply this diff to specify the return type:
-public static object CreateAnalyzeClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) +public static V1.IAnalyzeClient CreateAnalyzeClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// This method allows you to create an AnalyzeClient with a specific version of the client. /// </summary> public static V1.IAnalyzeClient CreateAnalyzeClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) { // Currently only a single version of the AnalyzeClient exists return new AnalyzeClient(apiKey, options, httpId); }
172-175:
⚠️ Potential issueReturn type should be more specific in
CreateListenRESTClientReturning
objectreduces type safety. Consider returningV1.IListenRESTClientdirectly.Apply this diff:
-public static object CreateListenRESTClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) +public static V1.IListenRESTClient CreateListenRESTClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static V1.IListenRESTClient CreateListenRESTClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) { // Currently only a single version of the ListenRESTClient exists return new ListenRESTClient(apiKey, options, httpId);
98-103:
⚠️ Potential issueReturn type should be more specific in
CreateManageClientReturning
objectreduces type safety. Consider returningV1.IManageClientdirectly to enhance code robustness.Apply this diff:
-public static object CreateManageClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) +public static V1.IManageClient CreateManageClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static V1.IManageClient CreateManageClient(int version, string apiKey = "", DeepgramHttpClientOptions? options = null, string? httpId = null) { // Currently only a single version of the ManageClient exists return new ManageClient(apiKey, options, httpId); }Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IManageClient.cs (7)
5-5: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider updating models to match interface version
The interface
IManageClientis in thev2namespace but references models fromDeepgram.Models.Manage.v1. Ensure that these models are compatible with the new interface, and consider updating or creatingv2models if necessary.
9-13:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove incorrect XML documentation tags and fix summary
Interfaces do not have parameters, so the
<param>tags on lines 12-13 are not applicable and should be removed. Additionally, the summary on line 10 incorrectly states "Implements version 1 of the Manage Client." Update it to reflect that this is version 2.
21-22:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove 'public' access modifiers from interface methods
In C#, methods declared in interfaces cannot have access modifiers; they are implicitly public. Remove the
publickeyword from the method declarations on the specified lines.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-public Task<ProjectsResponse> GetProjects(...) +Task<ProjectsResponse> GetProjects(...)Also applies to: 29-30, 39-40, 47-48, 55-56, 63-64, 73-74, 81-82, 89-90, 99-100, 108-109, 117-118, 126-127, 136-137, 145-146, 154-155, 164-165, 173-174, 183-185, 193-194, 204-205, 213-214, 223-224, 231-232, 241-242, 250-251
21-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider encapsulating optional parameters into a request options object
The method
GetProjectsand other methods accept multiple optional parameters:CancellationTokenSource? cancellationToken = default,Dictionary<string, string>? addons = null,Dictionary<string, string>? headers = null. Consider creating aRequestOptionsclass to encapsulate these parameters, which would simplify method signatures and improve maintainability.Example implementation:
public class RequestOptions { public CancellationTokenSource? CancellationToken { get; set; } = default; public Dictionary<string, string>? Addons { get; set; } = null; public Dictionary<string, string>? Headers { get; set; } = null; } // Updated method signature: Task<ProjectsResponse> GetProjects(RequestOptions? options = null);
87-88:
⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect parameter documentation in XML comment
On line 87, the
<param>tag refers toprojectIdwith the description "Id of Model", which is incorrect. The methodGetModeldoes not have aprojectIdparameter but has amodelIdparameter. Update the parameter name and description to match the method signature.
115-116:
⚠️ Potential issueParameter name mismatch in XML comment
The
<param>tag on line 115 names the parametercreateProjectKeySchema, but the method signature useskeySchema. Update the parameter name in the XML comment tokeySchemato match the method signature.
181-182:
⚠️ Potential issueParameter name mismatch in XML comment
The
<param>tag on line 181 refers tomemberScopeSchema, but the method signature usesscopeSchema. Update the parameter name in the XML comment toscopeSchemato match the method signature.Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (3)
101-260: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider reducing code duplication in
SubscribemethodsThe
Subscribemethods for different event types contain similar patterns where event handlers are wrapped and passed to the baseSubscribemethod or added to local events. While previous learnings indicate that these methods cannot be fully abstracted due to concrete type requirements, you might still consider using generics or helper functions to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.For example, you could introduce a generic method to handle the common wrapping logic:
private async Task<bool> Subscribe<TCommon, TSpecific>(EventHandler<TSpecific> eventHandler) where TSpecific : TCommon, new() { EventHandler<TCommon> wrappedHandler = (sender, args) => { var castedArgs = new TSpecific(); castedArgs.Copy(args); eventHandler(sender, castedArgs); }; return await base.Subscribe(wrappedHandler); }Then, your specific
Subscribemethods can utilize this helper:-public async Task<bool> Subscribe(EventHandler<OpenResponse> eventHandler) -{ - // Create a new event handler that wraps the original one - EventHandler<Common.OpenResponse> wrappedHandler = (sender, args) => - { - var castedArgs = new OpenResponse(); - castedArgs.Copy(args); - eventHandler(sender, castedArgs); - }; - - // Pass the new event handler to the base Subscribe method - return await base.Subscribe(wrappedHandler); -} +public async Task<bool> Subscribe(EventHandler<OpenResponse> eventHandler) +{ + return await Subscribe<Common.OpenResponse, OpenResponse>(eventHandler); +}
599-599:
⚠️ Potential issuePossible null reference exception when casting
resultResponse.IsFinalAt line 599,
resultResponse.IsFinalis cast to a non-nullableboolwithout checking if it isnull. SinceIsFinalis a nullable boolean, this could lead to aNullReferenceExceptionif it isnull. It's safer to check fortrueexplicitly.Apply this diff to fix the potential null reference:
-if ((bool)resultResponse.IsFinal) +if (resultResponse.IsFinal == true)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (resultResponse.IsFinal == true)🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 599-599:
Nullable value type may be null.🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 599-599:
Nullable value type may be null.🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 599-599:
Nullable value type may be null.🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 599-599:
Nullable value type may be null.
90-93:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle exceptions from background tasks to prevent unobserved exceptions
In the
Connectmethod, the background tasksProcessKeepAliveandProcessAutoFlushare started usingTask.Runwithout being awaited or stored. If these tasks throw exceptions, they could lead to unobserved exceptions, potentially causing the application to crash. Consider capturing the tasks and handling any exceptions to improve robustness.Refactor the methods to capture the tasks and handle exceptions, for example:
-void StartKeepAliveBackgroundThread() => Task.Run(() => ProcessKeepAlive()); +void StartKeepAliveBackgroundThread() +{ + _ = Task.Run(async () => await ProcessKeepAlive().ConfigureAwait(false)) + .ContinueWith(t => + { + if (t.Exception != null) + { + Log.Error("ProcessKeepAlive", $"Unhandled exception: {t.Exception}"); + } + }, TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnFaulted); +}Similarly, update
StartAutoFlushBackgroundThread()to handle exceptions.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (5)
655-667:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using
async voidfor non-event handler methods.The method
DecrementCounteris declared asasync void. Similar toInspectMessage, it's advisable to change the return type toTaskfor better error handling.Apply this diff to change the method signature:
-private async void DecrementCounter() +private async Task DecrementCounter() { await _mutexLastDatagram.WaitAsync(); try { _flushCount -= 1; Log.Debug("ProcessDataReceived", $"Decrement Flush count: {_flushCount}"); } finally { _mutexLastDatagram.Release(); } }Ensure that any calls to
DecrementCounterare awaited appropriately.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private async Task DecrementCounter() { await _mutexLastDatagram.WaitAsync(); try { _flushCount -= 1; Log.Debug("ProcessDataReceived", $"Decrement Flush count: {_flushCount}"); } finally { _mutexLastDatagram.Release(); } }
389-454:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using
async voidfor non-event handler methods.The method
ProcessAutoFlushis declared asasync void. To improve exception handling and maintainability, consider changing it to return aTask.Apply this diff to adjust the method:
-internal async void ProcessAutoFlush() +internal async Task ProcessAutoFlush() { Log.Verbose("LiveClient.ProcessAutoFlush", "ENTER"); // ... } -void StartAutoFlushBackgroundThread() => Task.Run(() => ProcessAutoFlush()); +void StartAutoFlushBackgroundThread() => Task.Run(ProcessAutoFlush);This change allows callers to await the method and handle any exceptions it may produce.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
363-367:
⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect use of
lockwithSemaphoreSlim_mutexLastDatagram.The
lockstatement is used on_mutexLastDatagram, which is aSemaphoreSlim. This is not recommended becauseSemaphoreSlimis not intended to be used with thelockkeyword. To ensure proper synchronization, you should use a dedicated lock object or utilize the semaphore's asynchronous methods.Apply this diff to use a dedicated lock object:
+ private readonly object _flushCountLock = new object(); public override void SendMessage(byte[] data, int length = Constants.UseArrayLengthForSend) { // auto flush if (_deepgramClientOptions.InspectSpeakMessage()) { string type = GetMessageType(data); Log.Debug("SendMessage", $"Inspecting Message: Sending {type}"); switch (type) { case Constants.Flush: - lock (_mutexLastDatagram) + lock (_flushCountLock) { _flushCount += 1; Log.Debug("SendMessage", $"Increment Flush count: {_flushCount}"); } break;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
669-685:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd exception handling in
GetMessageTypeto prevent unhandled exceptions.The method
GetMessageTypeparses a JSON document without handling potential exceptions. If the input is malformed or missing the expected properties, this could lead to unhandled exceptions. Implementing exception handling will improve the robustness of the code.Apply this diff to include exception handling:
internal string GetMessageType(byte[] msg) { // Convert the byte array to a string string response = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(msg); if (response == null) { return ""; } Log.Verbose("ProcessDataReceived", $"raw response: {response}"); - var data = JsonDocument.Parse(response); + JsonDocument data; + try + { + data = JsonDocument.Parse(response); + } + catch (JsonException ex) + { + Log.Error("GetMessageType", $"Failed to parse JSON response: {ex.Message}"); + return ""; + } - string val = data.RootElement.GetProperty("type").GetString() ?? ""; + string val; + if (data.RootElement.TryGetProperty("type", out JsonElement typeElement)) + { + val = typeElement.GetString() ?? ""; + } + else + { + Log.Warning("GetMessageType", "Response does not contain 'type' property"); + val = ""; + } Log.Debug("ProcessDataReceived", $"Type: {val}"); return val; }This ensures that any parsing errors are logged, and the method returns gracefully without throwing exceptions.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.internal string GetMessageType(byte[] msg) { // Convert the byte array to a string string response = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(msg); if (response == null) { return ""; } Log.Verbose("ProcessDataReceived", $"raw response: {response}"); JsonDocument data; try { data = JsonDocument.Parse(response); } catch (JsonException ex) { Log.Error("GetMessageType", $"Failed to parse JSON response: {ex.Message}"); return ""; } string val; if (data.RootElement.TryGetProperty("type", out JsonElement typeElement)) { val = typeElement.GetString() ?? ""; } else { Log.Warning("GetMessageType", "Response does not contain 'type' property"); val = ""; } Log.Debug("ProcessDataReceived", $"Type: {val}"); return val; }
632-653:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using
async voidfor non-event handler methods.The method
InspectMessageis declared asasync void. It's recommended to useasync Taskfor methods to allow proper error handling and awaitability. Changing the return type toTaskimproves code reliability.Apply this diff to change the method signature:
-private async void InspectMessage() +private async Task InspectMessage() { Log.Verbose("InspectMessage", "ENTER"); // ... }If changing to
async Taskis not feasible due to method call hierarchy, consider ensuring that exceptions within the method are properly handled to prevent unobserved exceptions.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private async Task InspectMessage() { Log.Verbose("InspectMessage", "ENTER"); if (_deepgramClientOptions.AutoFlushSpeakDelta > 0) { var now = DateTime.Now; Log.Debug("InspectMessage", $"AutoFlush last received. Time: {now}"); await _mutexLastDatagram.WaitAsync(); try { _lastReceived = now; } finally { _mutexLastDatagram.Release(); } } Log.Debug("InspectMessage", "Succeeded"); Log.Verbose("InspectMessage", "LEAVE"); }Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractWebSocketClient.cs (5)
86-91:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid logging sensitive header information
The current implementation logs header keys and values unless they contain specific substrings like "password" or "token". This approach might unintentionally log sensitive information. Consider masking header values or logging only non-sensitive headers to prevent potential exposure.
To address this, you can modify the logging to exclude header values or use a whitelist approach for headers that are safe to log.
Also applies to: 98-103
579-584:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent multiple disposals of resources
Both
StopandDisposemethods handle disposing of_clientWebSocketand_cancellationTokenSource. CallingDisposemultiple times or afterStopmight lead to exceptions due to disposing already disposed objects. Implementing a_disposedflag can help prevent this issue.Apply this diff to implement the
_disposedflag:+ private bool _disposed = false; public void Dispose() { + if (_disposed) + { + return; + } + if (_clientWebSocket == null) { return; } // Existing disposal logic... + _disposed = true; GC.SuppressFinalize(this); }Also applies to: 715-742
441-445:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle exceptions properly in background tasks
In
ProcessReceiveQueueandProcessSendQueue, exceptions are caught and logged, but the tasks may continue running in an inconsistent state. Consider rethrowing critical exceptions or implementing additional logic to safely terminate the tasks to avoid silent failures.Also applies to: 373-384
93-105: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor header addition logic to avoid duplication
The code for adding headers from
_deepgramClientOptions.Headersandheadersis duplicated. Refactor this logic into a separate method to enhance maintainability and reduce code repetition.
494-495:
⚠️ Potential issueSafely parse WebSocketType to prevent exceptions
Using
Enum.Parsewithout validation may throw an exception if thetypeproperty is missing or invalid in the JSON response. Replace it withEnum.TryParseto handle parsing more safely.Here's a suggested change:
- var val = Enum.Parse(typeof(WebSocketType), data.RootElement.GetProperty("type").GetString()!); + if (!Enum.TryParse<WebSocketType>(data.RootElement.GetProperty("type").GetString(), out var val)) + { + Log.Warning("ProcessTextMessage", "Received unknown or invalid WebSocket type."); + return; + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!Enum.TryParse<WebSocketType>(data.RootElement.GetProperty("type").GetString(), out var val)) { Log.Warning("ProcessTextMessage", "Received unknown or invalid WebSocket type."); return; }Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs (5)
86-86:
⚠️ Potential issueUse 'await' instead of '.Result' to prevent blocking calls
Using
.Resulton asynchronous methods within anasyncmethod can cause deadlocks or performance issues by blocking the thread. Replace.Resultwithawaitto properly handle the asynchronous operation.Apply the following changes:
- var resultStr = response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().Result; + var resultStr = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();This change should be applied to each occurrence in the specified lines.
Also applies to: 149-149, 346-346, 422-422, 502-502, 580-580, 648-648, 718-718
84-84:
⚠️ Potential issueDispose of 'HttpResponseMessage' to prevent resource leaks
The
HttpResponseMessageshould be disposed properly to free unmanaged resources and avoid potential memory leaks. Wrap the response handling in ausingstatement.Refactor the code as follows:
- var response = await _httpClient.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken.Token); - var resultStr = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(); - if (!response.IsSuccessStatusCode) - { - await ThrowException("MethodName", response, resultStr); - } - // Other code... + using (var response = await _httpClient.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken.Token)) + { + var resultStr = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(); + if (!response.IsSuccessStatusCode) + { + await ThrowException("MethodName", response, resultStr); + } + // Other code... + }Replace
"MethodName"with the actual method name in each case.Also applies to: 147-147, 224-224, 343-343, 420-420, 500-500, 578-578, 646-646, 716-716
566-572:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid logging sensitive header information
Logging header keys that may contain sensitive information like passwords or tokens can lead to security issues. Ensure that such headers are not logged.
[security]
Modify the logging condition to prevent logging sensitive headers:
if (!(tmp.Contains("password") || tmp.Contains("token") || tmp.Contains("authorization") || tmp.Contains("auth"))) { Log.Debug("PutAsync<S, T>", $"Add Header {header.Key}={header.Value}"); } + else + { + Log.Debug("PutAsync<S, T>", $"Sensitive header '{header.Key}' not logged."); + } request.Headers.Add(header.Key, header.Value);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.{ var tmp = header.Key.ToLower(); if (!(tmp.Contains("password") || tmp.Contains("token") || tmp.Contains("authorization") || tmp.Contains("auth"))) { Log.Debug("PutAsync<S, T>", $"Add Header {header.Key}={header.Value}"); } else { Log.Debug("PutAsync<S, T>", $"Sensitive header '{header.Key}' not logged."); } request.Headers.Add(header.Key, header.Value);
235-264: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify header processing using a 'foreach' loop
Using a
forloop withElementAt(i)on an enumerable can lead to decreased performance and less readable code. Replace it with aforeachloop for better efficiency and clarity.Refactor the code as follows:
- for (var i = 0; i < response.Headers.Count(); i++) - { - var key = response.Headers.ElementAt(i).Key.ToLower(); - var value = response.Headers.GetValues(key).FirstOrDefault() ?? ""; - // Remaining code... - } + foreach (var header in response.Headers) + { + var key = header.Key.ToLower(); + var value = header.Value.FirstOrDefault() ?? ""; + // Remaining code... + }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
748-775:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle possible null 'errMsg' to prevent null reference exceptions
The
errMsgparameter might benull, which can lead to aNullReferenceExceptionwhen creating a newDeepgramException. Ensure thaterrMsgis notnullbefore passing it to the exception constructor.Modify the code to provide a default message if
errMsgisnullor empty:- throw new DeepgramException(errMsg); + var message = string.IsNullOrEmpty(errMsg) ? "An unknown error occurred." : errMsg; + throw new DeepgramException(message);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private static async Task ThrowException(string module, HttpResponseMessage response, string errMsg) { if (errMsg == null || errMsg.Length == 0) { Log.Verbose(module, $"HTTP/REST Exception thrown"); response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); // this throws the exception } Log.Verbose(module, $"Deepgram Exception: {errMsg}"); DeepgramRESTException? resException = null; try { resException = await HttpRequestUtil.DeserializeAsync<DeepgramRESTException>(response); } catch (Exception ex) { Log.Verbose(module, $"DeserializeAsync Error Exception: {ex}"); } if (resException != null) { Log.Verbose(module, "DeepgramRESTException thrown"); throw resException; } Log.Verbose(module, $"Deepgram Generic Exception thrown"); var message = string.IsNullOrEmpty(errMsg) ? "An unknown error occurred." : errMsg; throw new DeepgramException(message); }🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs (3)
86-86:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid synchronous calls to asynchronous methods
In the methods
GetAsync<T>,GetAsync<S, T>,PostAsync<S, T>,PostAsync<R, S, T>,PatchAsync<S, T>,PutAsync<S, T>,DeleteAsync<T>, andDeleteAsync<S, T>, the use ofReadAsStringAsync().Resulton lines 86, 149, 345, 422, 502, 580, 648, and 718 blocks the asynchronous flow and can lead to deadlocks. It's recommended to await the asynchronous call to read the response content without blocking the thread.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- var resultStr = response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().Result; + var resultStr = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();Also applies to: 149-149, 345-345, 422-422, 502-502, 580-580, 648-648, 718-718
75-80:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure consistent handling of sensitive headers when logging
In several methods, headers are added to requests and logged for debugging purposes (e.g., lines 75-80 in
GetAsync<T>). However, sensitive information such as authorization tokens or passwords might be included in headers. While thePutAsync<S, T>method (lines 565-574) includes a check to avoid logging sensitive headers, this precaution is missing in other methods. For consistency and security, implement similar checks in all methods where headers are logged.Apply this pattern to filter sensitive headers before logging:
foreach (var header in headers) { + var headerKeyLower = header.Key.ToLower(); + if (!(headerKeyLower.Contains("password") || headerKeyLower.Contains("token") || headerKeyLower.Contains("authorization") || headerKeyLower.Contains("auth"))) + { Log.Debug("MethodName", $"Add Header {header.Key}={header.Value}"); + } request.Headers.Add(header.Key, header.Value); }Replace
"MethodName"with the appropriate method name in each case.Also applies to: 138-143, 215-220, 334-339, 411-416, 491-496, 637-642, 707-712
774-774:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential null reference for 'errMsg' in
ThrowExceptionmethodAt line 774, the
errMsgparameter could be null, which may cause anArgumentNullExceptionwhen creating a newDeepgramException. Ensure thaterrMsgis not null before throwing the exception. IferrMsgis null or empty, provide a default error message.Apply this diff to handle null
errMsg:Log.Verbose(module, $"Deepgram Generic Exception thrown"); - throw new DeepgramException(errMsg); + throw new DeepgramException(errMsg ?? "An unknown error occurred.");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.throw new DeepgramException(errMsg ?? "An unknown error occurred.");🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.
I will review this Monday and go through the comments one at a time. |
dvonthenen
force-pushed
the
auto-flush-deadlock-plus-refactor
branch
from
f63d33f
to
e70e0cb
Compare
|
Integrated CodeRabbit feedback into PR. A lot if fluff or want to minimize changes and some of it is good. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 65
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (42)
Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs (2)
7-7: Consider renaming the constructor parameter for clarity.The constructor parameter
textis used to initialize theTypeproperty, but the naming suggests it contains text content rather than a control message type. Consider renaming it totypeormessageTypefor better clarity.-public class ControlMessage(string text) +public class ControlMessage(string messageType)
Line range hint
10-14: Enhance documentation and add validation for control message types.The current implementation could benefit from:
- Documentation listing the valid control message types
- Input validation to ensure only valid message types are accepted
Consider adding validation and enhancing the documentation:
/// <summary> /// Gets or sets the type of control message. + /// Valid types include: + /// - "start" - Initiates the message processing + /// - "stop" - Terminates the message processing /// </summary> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("type")] - public string? Type { get; set; } = text; + public string? Type + { + get => _type; + set + { + if (value != null && !IsValidMessageType(value)) + { + throw new ArgumentException("Invalid control message type", nameof(value)); + } + _type = value; + } + } + + private string? _type = messageType; + + private static bool IsValidMessageType(string type) + { + return type is "start" or "stop"; + }Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs (1)
Line range hint
22-23: Consider adding XML documentation for the Dispose method.While the implementation is correct, adding XML documentation for the
Disposemethod would maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase's documentation style.+ /// <summary> + /// Releases the resources used by the AudioResponse. + /// </summary> public void Dispose()Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs (1)
7-30: Enhance XML documentation for better IntelliSense support.While basic documentation exists, it could be more comprehensive for better developer experience.
Consider adding more detailed XML documentation:
/// <summary> +/// Represents the average sentiment analysis results for the audio content. +/// </summary> +/// <remarks> +/// This record encapsulates both the sentiment classification and its corresponding score, +/// providing insights into the emotional tone of the analyzed content. +/// </remarks> public record Average { /// <summary> - /// Sentiment: Positive, Negative, or Neutral. + /// Gets or sets the sentiment classification of the content. /// </summary> + /// <value>One of the following values: "Positive", "Negative", or "Neutral".</value> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("sentiment")] public string? Sentiment { get; set; } /// <summary> - /// Sentiment score. + /// Gets or sets the numerical score indicating the strength of the sentiment. /// </summary> + /// <value>A value typically ranging from -1.0 (most negative) to 1.0 (most positive).</value> [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] [JsonPropertyName("sentiment_score")] public double? SentimentScore { get; set; }Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (2)
10-33: Add thread synchronization for concurrent accessGiven this class is part of the WebSocket client implementation and the PR addresses threading issues, consider making the class thread-safe.
Consider these improvements:
- Add
readonlyto the dictionary field to prevent concurrent dictionary replacement- Use
ConcurrentDictionaryif metadata needs to be modified concurrently- Add thread synchronization for Content access
- Add checks for disposed state in all public members
Example:
+ private readonly object _lock = new object(); + private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<string, string> _metadata; + private volatile bool _disposed; public Dictionary<string, string> Metadata { - get => _metadata; + get => new Dictionary<string, string>(_metadata); } public MemoryStream Content { get { + ThrowIfDisposed(); + lock (_lock) { return _content; } } set { + ThrowIfDisposed(); + lock (_lock) { // ... existing set logic ... } } } + private void ThrowIfDisposed() + { + if (_disposed) + throw new ObjectDisposedException(nameof(LocalFileWithMetadata)); + }
7-9: Enhance XML documentation for better API understandingThe current documentation could be more comprehensive to help API consumers understand the class behavior better.
Add documentation for:
- Thread safety guarantees
- Exception conditions
- Constructor behavior
- Disposal requirements
Example additions:
/// <summary> /// LocalFileWithMetadata is a class that represents a file with metadata. /// </summary> +/// <remarks> +/// This class is thread-safe and can be safely accessed from multiple threads. +/// Instances of this class should be disposed of properly to release resources. +/// </remarks> public class LocalFileWithMetadata : IDisposable { + /// <summary> + /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="LocalFileWithMetadata"/> class. + /// </summary> + /// <remarks> + /// Creates an empty metadata dictionary and initializes an empty content stream. + /// </remarks> /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the metadata associated with the file content. /// </summary> + /// <exception cref="ObjectDisposedException"> + /// Thrown when the instance has been disposed. + /// </exception> /// <summary> /// Gets or sets the file content as a MemoryStream. /// </summary> + /// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException"> + /// Thrown when attempting to set a null value. + /// </exception> + /// <exception cref="ObjectDisposedException"> + /// Thrown when the instance has been disposed. + /// </exception>Also applies to: 12-15, 17-24
Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Metadata.cs (2)
16-21: Enhance ModelUUID documentation.The current documentation is minimal. Consider adding more context about what this UUID represents and when it's populated.
/// <summary> - /// Model UUID + /// A unique identifier for the specific model version used in processing. + /// This can be useful for tracking and reproducing results with exact model versions. /// </summary>
23-28: Add cross-reference to ModelInfo type.The documentation references ModelInfo but lacks a proper cross-reference link.
/// <summary> - /// IReadonlyDictionary of <see cref="ModelInfo"/> + /// Information about the model used for processing. + /// See <see cref="ModelInfo"/> for detailed model properties. /// </summary>Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (2)
7-37: Enhance XML documentation for better IntelliSense support.While the basic documentation is present, it could be more descriptive to provide better context for API consumers. Consider adding:
- Property constraints or expected formats
- Examples of typical values
- Impact of null values on serialization
Example enhancement for the Description property:
- /// <summary> - /// Error Description - /// </summary> + /// <summary> + /// Detailed description of the error that occurred during WebSocket communication. + /// When null, this field will be omitted from JSON serialization. + /// </summary> + /// <example> + /// "Invalid audio format provided" + /// </example>
57-60: Document potential exceptions in ToString method.The ToString implementation could throw exceptions during serialization or unescaping. Consider:
/// <summary> /// Override ToString method to serialize the object /// </summary> + /// <returns>A JSON string representation of the error response</returns> + /// <exception cref="JsonException">Thrown when serialization fails</exception> public override string ToString() { return Regex.Unescape(JsonSerializer.Serialize(this, JsonSerializeOptions.DefaultOptions)); }Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakRESTClient.cs (3)
14-26: Improve region naming and method documentation.
- The region name "NoneCallBacks" doesn't follow C# naming conventions and isn't descriptive. Consider "SynchronousMethods" instead.
- The
ToFilemethod is missing XML documentation.Consider these changes:
- #region NoneCallBacks + #region Synchronous Methods /// <summary> /// Speaks a file using the provided stream /// </summary> /// <param name="source">file is the form of a stream <see cref="Stream"/></param> /// <param name="speakSchema">Options for the transcription <see cref="SpeakSchema"/></param> /// <returns><see cref="SyncResponse"/></returns> public Task<SyncResponse> ToStream(TextSource source...); + /// <summary> + /// Speaks a file and saves the audio to the specified file + /// </summary> + /// <param name="source">Text to convert to speech</param> + /// <param name="filename">Path where the audio file will be saved</param> + /// <param name="speakSchema">Options for the transcription <see cref="SpeakSchema"/></param> + /// <returns><see cref="SyncResponse"/></returns> public Task<SyncResponse> ToFile(TextSource source...);
28-38: Fix XML documentation and region formatting.
- The XML documentation for
speakSchemaparameter has a missing closing tag- The region name has inconsistent spacing (two spaces)
Apply these fixes:
- #region CallBack Methods + #region Callback Methods /// <summary> /// Speaks a file using the provided byte array and providing a CallBack /// </summary> /// <param name="source">file is the form of a byte[]</param> /// <param name="callBack">CallBack url</param> - /// <param name="speakSchema">Options for the transcription<see cref="SpeakSchema"></param> + /// <param name="speakSchema">Options for the transcription <see cref="SpeakSchema"/></param> /// <returns><see cref="AsyncResponse"/></returns> public Task<AsyncResponse> StreamCallBack(TextSource source...);
1-39: Well-structured interface design with proper async patterns.The interface design aligns well with the PR objectives of improving the threading model:
- Clear separation between synchronous and asynchronous operations
- Consistent parameter patterns across methods
- Proper use of Task-based async pattern
- Flexible options through optional parameters
The structure will support the intended v2 improvements for handling deadlocks mentioned in the PR objectives.
Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs (2)
7-8: Add XML documentation for the record type.Please add XML documentation to describe this record's purpose and its relationship to v1, as this is part of the v2 breaking changes mentioned in the PR objectives.
+/// <summary> +/// Represents the response structure for WebSocket communication in v2 clients. +/// This is part of the v2 implementation that addresses threading and deadlock issues. +/// </summary> public record ResultResponse
12-14: Fix inconsistent indentation in JSON attributes.The JSON attributes use inconsistent indentation (mix of tabs and spaces). Please standardize the indentation for better maintainability.
[JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] - [JsonPropertyName("channel")] + [JsonPropertyName("channel")]Also applies to: 19-21, 26-28, 33-35, 40-42, 47-49, 54-56, 61-63, 68-71
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IAnalyzeClient.cs (2)
18-20: Fix XML documentation inconsistencies.The parameter documentation has inconsistent usage of
<see>tags. Some tags are not properly closed, and some parameters use plain text instead of<see>.Example fix for the AnalyzeUrl method:
- <param name="source">Url to the file that is to be analyzed <see cref="UrlSource"></param> + <param name="source">Url to the file that is to be analyzed <see cref="UrlSource"/></param>Also applies to: 27-29, 35-37, 44-46
12-94: Consider enhancing interface design and documentation.Suggestions for improvement:
- Add input validation attributes (e.g.,
[NotNull]) for required parameters- Document the differences between sync and callback methods in the interface summary
- Add remarks about the relationship between v1 and v2 interfaces, explaining the breaking changes
Would you like me to provide examples of these enhancements?
Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-245: Consider documenting thread safety guarantees.Given that this PR addresses deadlock issues, it would be valuable to:
- Document the thread safety guarantees of both v1 and v2 clients
- Add XML documentation comments explaining the differences in threading models
- Consider adding runtime checks or diagnostics to help users identify potential threading issues
Add XML documentation to the factory methods explaining the threading model differences:
/// <summary> /// Creates a new ListenWebSocketClient using the latest version (v2). /// </summary> /// <remarks> /// V2 clients use an asynchronous programming model that prevents deadlocks /// on systems with low CPU counts. This is the recommended version for all /// new implementations. /// </remarks>🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs (2)
15-15: Add missinginternalkeyword for field visibility.The field declaration is missing the explicit
internalkeyword, though it's marked in the comment.- internal HttpClient _httpClient; + internal readonly HttpClient _httpClient;
41-41: Fix typo in debug logging.The debug log statement has a typo in the variable name.
- Log.Debug("AbstractRestClient", $"options: {options.OnPrem}"); + Log.Debug("AbstractRestClient", $"OnPrem: {options.OnPrem}");Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs (6)
14-23: Enhance deprecation notice with migration guidance.While the deprecation notice is clear, consider enhancing it with specific migration instructions and a link to the migration guide to help users transition to v2 smoothly.
// *********** WARNING *********** // Implements version 1 of the Speak WebSocket Client // // Deprecated: This class is deprecated. Use the `v2` of the client instead. +// For migration instructions, see: <link-to-migration-guide> +// Key differences in v2: +// - Improved threading model to prevent deadlocks +// - Better async/await support +// - Enhanced error handling // This will be removed in a future release. // // This class is frozen and no new functionality will be added. // *********** WARNING ***********
Line range hint
28-31: Consider consolidating synchronization primitives.Multiple SemaphoreSlim instances increase complexity and potential for deadlocks. Consider using a single AsyncLock or SemaphoreSlim with async/await pattern.
- private readonly SemaphoreSlim _mutexSubscribe = new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1); - private readonly SemaphoreSlim _mutexSend = new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1); - private readonly SemaphoreSlim _mutexLastDatagram = new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1); + private readonly SemaphoreSlim _mutex = new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1);
Line range hint
392-394: Replace Task.Factory.StartNew with Task.Run for background operations.Using Task.Factory.StartNew with LongRunning option can create too many OS threads. Consider using Task.Run which better integrates with the thread pool.
- void StartSenderBackgroundThread() => _ = Task.Factory.StartNew( - _ => ProcessSendQueue(), - TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning); + void StartSenderBackgroundThread() => _ = Task.Run(ProcessSendQueue); - void StartReceiverBackgroundThread() => _ = Task.Factory.StartNew( - _ => ProcessReceiveQueue(), - TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning); + void StartReceiverBackgroundThread() => _ = Task.Run(ProcessReceiveQueue); - void StartAutoFlushBackgroundThread() => _ = Task.Factory.StartNew( - _ => ProcessAutoFlush(), - TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning); + void StartAutoFlushBackgroundThread() => _ = Task.Run(ProcessAutoFlush);Also applies to: 397-399, 402-404
Line range hint
526-569: Improve resource cleanup in ProcessReceiveQueue.The MemoryStream usage could be simplified with using declarations, and the buffer array could be reused across iterations.
- using (var ms = new MemoryStream()) + var buffer = new byte[Constants.BufferSize]; + var segment = new ArraySegment<byte>(buffer); + await using var ms = new MemoryStream(); { do { - result = await _clientWebSocket.ReceiveAsync(buffer, _cancellationTokenSource.Token); + result = await _clientWebSocket.ReceiveAsync(segment, _cancellationTokenSource.Token);
Line range hint
405-432: Enhance error handling in ProcessSendQueue.The catch blocks could be more specific and provide better error context. Consider adding specific exception types and including queue state information in logs.
- catch (Exception ex) + catch (WebSocketException ex) { - Log.Error("ProcessSendQueue", $"{ex.GetType()} thrown {ex.Message}"); + Log.Error("ProcessSendQueue", $"WebSocket error during send: {ex.Message}, WebSocketError: {ex.WebSocketErrorCode}"); Log.Verbose("ProcessSendQueue", $"Excepton: {ex}"); Log.Verbose("SpeakWSClient.ProcessSendQueue", "LEAVE"); + throw; + } + catch (InvalidOperationException ex) + { + Log.Error("ProcessSendQueue", $"Invalid operation during send: {ex.Message}"); + Log.Verbose("ProcessSendQueue", $"Exception: {ex}"); + throw; }
Line range hint
571-700: Modernize message type handling with pattern matching.The switch statement for message types could be simplified using C# pattern matching, making the code more maintainable.
- switch (val) - { - case SpeakType.Open: - var openResponse = data.Deserialize<OpenResponse>(); + var response = val switch + { + SpeakType.Open => HandleResponse<OpenResponse>(data, _openReceived), + SpeakType.Metadata => HandleResponse<MetadataResponse>(data, _metadataReceived), + SpeakType.Flushed => HandleResponse<FlushedResponse>(data, _flushedReceived), + // ... other cases + _ => HandleUnhandledResponse(response) + }; + if (response != null) + { + await InvokeEventHandlerAsync(response); + }Consider adding a helper method for response handling:
private T? HandleResponse<T>(JsonDocument data, EventHandler<T>? handler) where T : class { if (handler == null) { Log.Debug("ProcessDataReceived", $"{typeof(T).Name} has no listeners"); return null; } var response = data.Deserialize<T>(); if (response == null) { Log.Warning("ProcessDataReceived", $"{typeof(T).Name} is invalid"); return null; } return response; }Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs (4)
Line range hint
27-31: Consider revising the threading model to prevent potential deadlocks.The current implementation uses multiple
SemaphoreSliminstances which could contribute to deadlock scenarios. Consider:
- Using a single synchronization object where possible
- Implementing async/await patterns throughout instead of explicit synchronization
This aligns with the PR's objective of addressing deadlock issues. Consider this pattern:
- private readonly SemaphoreSlim _mutexSubscribe = new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1); - private readonly SemaphoreSlim _mutexSend = new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1); - private readonly SemaphoreSlim _mutexLastDatagram = new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1); + private readonly AsyncLock _asyncLock = new AsyncLock();
Line range hint
392-407: Modernize task creation pattern.The current use of
Task.Factory.StartNewwithTaskCreationOptions.LongRunningfor all background tasks is not optimal. Consider:
- Using
Task.Runfor standard background operations- Only use
TaskCreationOptions.LongRunningfor truly long-running operationsExample refactor:
- void StartSenderBackgroundThread() => _ = Task.Factory.StartNew( - _ => ProcessSendQueue(), - TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning); + void StartSenderBackgroundThread() => _ = Task.Run( + async () => await ProcessSendQueue(), + _cancellationTokenSource.Token);
Line range hint
1018-1047: Enhance resource cleanup implementation.The current Dispose pattern implementation could be improved:
- Consider implementing the full dispose pattern with a protected virtual Dispose(bool)
- Use using statements for disposable resources
- Add null checks before disposal
Consider this implementation:
+ private bool _disposed; + public void Dispose() { + Dispose(true); + GC.SuppressFinalize(this); + } + + protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing) + { + if (_disposed) return; + if (disposing) + { if (_cancellationTokenSource != null) { if (!_cancellationTokenSource.Token.IsCancellationRequested) { _cancellationTokenSource.Cancel(); } _cancellationTokenSource.Dispose(); _cancellationTokenSource = null; } if (_sendChannel != null) { _sendChannel.Writer.Complete(); } if (_clientWebSocket != null) { _clientWebSocket.Dispose(); _clientWebSocket = null; } } + _disposed = true; }
Line range hint
947-971: Simplify event invocation pattern.The current parallel event invocation pattern might be unnecessarily complex and could lead to unexpected behavior:
- Event handlers typically don't need parallel execution
- Order of execution might be important for subscribers
Consider a simpler implementation:
- private void InvokeParallel<T>(EventHandler<T> eventHandler, T e) - { - if (eventHandler != null) - { - try - { - Parallel.ForEach( - eventHandler.GetInvocationList().Cast<EventHandler<T>>(), - (handler) => - handler(null, e)); - } - catch (AggregateException ae) - { - Log.Error("InvokeParallel", $"AggregateException occurred in one or more event handlers: {ae}"); - } - catch (Exception ex) - { - Log.Error("InvokeParallel", $"Exception occurred in event handler: {ex}"); - } - } - } + private void InvokeEvent<T>(EventHandler<T> eventHandler, T e) + { + var handler = eventHandler; + if (handler != null) + { + try + { + handler(null, e); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Log.Error("InvokeEvent", $"Exception in event handler: {ex}"); + } + } + }Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs (2)
37-37: Correct typo in XML documentation comment.There's a typo in the
<param>tag forsource: "streasm" should be "stream".Apply this diff to correct the typo:
-/// <param name="source">file is the form of a streasm <see cref="Stream"/></param> +/// <param name="source">File in the form of a stream <see cref="Stream"/></param>
22-22: Remove redundant 'public' modifier in interface method declarations.In C#, members of an interface are implicitly public. Including the 'public' modifier is unnecessary and can be omitted for cleaner code.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant 'public' modifier:
-public Task<SyncResponse> TranscribeUrl(UrlSource source, PreRecordedSchema? prerecordedSchema, +Task<SyncResponse> TranscribeUrl(UrlSource source, PreRecordedSchema? prerecordedSchema,Repeat this change for all method declarations within the interface.
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IManageClient.cs (4)
16-16: Improve clarity in the summary commentChange "Gets projects associated to ApiKey" to "Gets projects associated with the API key" for better grammatical correctness.
24-24: Enhance consistency and clarity in the summary commentUpdate the comment to "Gets the project associated with the project ID" and ensure "ID" is consistently capitalized throughout the comments.
142-142: Standardize parameter description capitalizationCapitalize "email" to "Email" for consistency with other parameter descriptions.
Apply this diff:
-/// <param name="email">email of the invite to be removed</param> +/// <param name="email">Email of the invite to be removed</param>
180-180: Improve comment formatting and capitalizationAdd a space before
<see...>and capitalize the sentence: "Updates scope options for the member.<see cref="MemberScopeSchema"/>"Apply this diff:
-/// <param name="memberScopeSchema">updates scope options for member<see cref="MemberScopeSchema"/></param> +/// <param name="memberScopeSchema">Updates scope options for the member. <see cref="MemberScopeSchema"/></param>Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractWebSocketClient.cs (2)
176-184: Simplify event handler subscription inSubscribemethodsIn the
Subscribemethods for event handlers (OpenResponse,CloseResponse,UnhandledResponse,ErrorResponse), you're adding handlers using a lambda expression that directly calls the providedeventHandler. This can be simplified by subscribing theeventHandlerdirectly, improving readability.Apply this diff to simplify the event subscription:
try { - _openReceived += (sender, e) => eventHandler(sender, e); + _openReceived += eventHandler; } finally { _mutexSubscribe.Release(); } // Similarly update other Subscribe methods: try { - _closeReceived += (sender, e) => eventHandler(sender, e); + _closeReceived += eventHandler; } // ... try { - _unhandledReceived += (sender, e) => eventHandler(sender, e); + _unhandledReceived += eventHandler; } // ... try { - _errorReceived += (sender, e) => eventHandler(sender, e); + _errorReceived += eventHandler; } // ...Also applies to: 195-204, 213-222, 231-240
585-590: Ambiguous return value when client is already disposed inStopmethodIn the
Stopmethod, if_clientWebSocketisnull(indicating the client has already been disposed), the method logs this information and returnstrue. This might confuse the caller into thinking that the stop operation was performed successfully, even though no action was taken.Consider returning
falseto indicate that the client was already stopped, or adjust the logic to more accurately reflect the operation's outcome.if (_clientWebSocket == null) { Log.Information("Stop", "Client has already been disposed"); Log.Verbose("AbstractWebSocketClient.Stop", "LEAVE"); - return true; + return false; }Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs (2)
109-109: Typographical Errors in Log Messages: Correct 'Excepton' to 'Exception'The log messages contain a typo where "Exception" is misspelled as "Excepton".
Please correct the typo in the following lines:
- Log.Verbose("GetAsync<T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("GetAsync<T>", $"Exception: {ex}");Apply this change to the following lines:
- Line 109 in
GetAsync<T>- Line 173 in
GetAsync<S, T>- Line 295 in
PostRetrieveLocalFileAsync<R, S, T>- Line 369 in
PostAsync<S, T>- Line 447 in
PostAsync<R, S, T>- Line 527 in
PatchAsync<S, T>- Line 605 in
PutAsync<S, T>- Line 672 in
DeleteAsync<T>- Line 743 in
DeleteAsync<S, T>Also applies to: 173-173, 295-295, 369-369, 447-447, 527-527, 605-605, 672-672, 743-743
35-36: Unused Assignment of_httpClientAt line 35,
_httpClientis assigned fromHttpClientFactory.Create(httpId), and immediately reassigned at line 36 withHttpClientFactory.ConfigureDeepgram(_httpClient, options). However,ConfigureDeepgrammight not require the previously created_httpClient.Consider simplifying the assignment to:
- _httpClient = HttpClientFactory.Create(httpId); - _httpClient = HttpClientFactory.ConfigureDeepgram(_httpClient, options); + _httpClient = HttpClientFactory.ConfigureDeepgram(HttpClientFactory.Create(httpId), options);Or adjust based on the methods' implementations to eliminate any unnecessary steps.
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs (2)
7-7: Consider renaming the namespace 'v2' to 'V2' to follow .NET naming conventionsAccording to .NET naming conventions, namespace names should use PascalCase. Changing
v2toV2would improve consistency and readability.
147-151: Rename 'State' method to 'GetState' for clarityThe method
State()could be renamed toGetState()to better indicate that it retrieves the current state of the WebSocket.Apply this change:
-public WebSocketState State(); +public WebSocketState GetState();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
- Deepgram.Dev.sln (3 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/Fakes/ConcreteRestClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AbstractRestClientTests.cs (0 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/SpeakClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/RequestContentUtilTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (0 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/Utilities.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractWebSocketClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Utilities.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/WebSocketMessage.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs (10 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Analyze/v1/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v1/ISpeakClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v1/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IAnalyzeClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ILiveClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IManageClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IOnPremClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IPreRecordedClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISelfHostedClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakRESTClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/REST/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UriSegments.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Manage/v1/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/SelfHosted/v1/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/REST/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/UriSegments.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/GlobalUsings.cs (0 hunks)
- Deepgram/ListenWebSocketClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/WebSocketType.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Alternative.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Channel.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Hit.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ListenType.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/LiveSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Metadata.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/MetadataResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ModelInfo.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Search.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/SpeechStartedResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UtteranceEndResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Word.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs (1 hunks)
⛔ Files not processed due to max files limit (24)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ClearedResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/FlushedResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/MetadataResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/SpeakSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/SpeakType.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/TextSource.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/WarningResponse.cs
- Deepgram/SpeakWebSocketClient.cs
- examples/speech-to-text/websocket/file/Program.cs
- examples/speech-to-text/websocket/http/Program.cs
- examples/speech-to-text/websocket/microphone/Program.cs
- examples/text-to-speech/websocket/simple/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/keepalive/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/reconnect_same_object/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/stt_v1_client_example/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/stt_v1_client_example/Streaming.csproj
- tests/edge_cases/tts_v1_client_example/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/tts_v1_client_example/Speak.csproj
- tests/expected_failures/websocket/exercise_timeout/Program.cs
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AbstractRestClientTests.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs
- Deepgram/GlobalUsings.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ResponseEvent.cs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (51)
- Deepgram.Tests/Fakes/ConcreteRestClient.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/SpeakClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/RequestContentUtilTests.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/Utilities.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Utilities.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/WebSocketMessage.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Analyze/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ILiveClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IOnPremClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IPreRecordedClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISelfHostedClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/REST/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UriSegments.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Manage/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/SelfHosted/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/REST/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/UriSegments.cs
- Deepgram/ListenWebSocketClient.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/WebSocketType.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Alternative.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Channel.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Hit.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ListenType.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/LiveSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/MetadataResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ModelInfo.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Search.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/SpeechStartedResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UtteranceEndResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Word.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (4)
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs (2)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/Client.cs:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:46.086Z Learning: The event subscription methods in the Deepgram .NET SDK cannot be abstracted into a common method due to concrete type requirements for each event handler.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/Client.cs:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-08-08T19:34:11.728Z Learning: The event subscription methods in the Deepgram .NET SDK cannot be abstracted into a common method due to concrete type requirements for each event handler.Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (2)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs:7-10 Timestamp: 2024-09-18T17:03:19.489Z Learning: In this codebase, using primary constructors in classes (e.g., `public class ClassName(parameters)`) is valid syntax. Do not flag this as a syntax error in future reviews.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs:7-10 Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:46.087Z Learning: In this codebase, using primary constructors in classes (e.g., `public class ClassName(parameters)`) is valid syntax. Do not flag this as a syntax error in future reviews.Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (2)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/Client.cs:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:46.086Z Learning: The event subscription methods in the Deepgram .NET SDK cannot be abstracted into a common method due to concrete type requirements for each event handler.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/Client.cs:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-08-08T19:34:11.728Z Learning: The event subscription methods in the Deepgram .NET SDK cannot be abstracted into a common method due to concrete type requirements for each event handler.Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs (3)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs:7-8 Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:48.728Z Learning: Primary constructor syntax in class declarations, such as `public class ClassName(Type parameter)`, is valid starting from C# 12.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs:7-8 Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:46.086Z Learning: Primary constructor syntax in class declarations, such as `public class ClassName(Type parameter)`, is valid starting from C# 12.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs:7-8 Timestamp: 2024-09-18T17:03:37.231Z Learning: Primary constructor syntax in class declarations, such as `public class ClassName(Type parameter)`, is valid starting from C# 12.
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
[warning] 609-609:
Nullable value type may be null.
🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
[warning] 609-609:
Nullable value type may be null.
🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
[warning] 609-609:
Nullable value type may be null.
🪛 GitHub Check: build
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
[warning] 609-609:
Nullable value type may be null.
🔇 Additional comments (27)
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v1/ResponseEvent.cs (2)
11-14: LGTM! Clean constructor implementation.The constructor properly initializes the immutable Response property and handles nullable types correctly.
7-7: Verify the impact of interface to class conversion.The change from
IResponseEvent<T>to concreteResponseEvent<T>with an immutableResponseproperty is a good design choice that aligns with thread-safety goals. However, this is a breaking change that requires verification of existing implementations.Also applies to: 9-9
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the search results further to verify the impact of interface changes.
Based on the previous search results, I can now generate a final response:
Interface to class conversion is properly implemented across the codebase
The conversion from
IResponseEvent<T>to concreteResponseEvent<T>has been consistently implemented across all relevant files in the codebase. The search results show:
- No remaining references to the old
IResponseEventinterface- Consistent implementation of
ResponseEvent<T>in all v1 and v2 interface and client files- Proper inheritance hierarchy maintained (e.g.,
Live/v1/ResponseEvent.csinheriting fromWS.ResponseEvent<T>)- All implementations follow the same pattern with nullable
Responseproperty🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all implementations and usages of IResponseEvent to ensure they're updated # Test 1: Find old interface implementations rg "IResponseEvent" -l # Test 2: Find places where ResponseEvent is used rg "ResponseEvent<" -A 3Length of output: 2012
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining interface references or implementations rg "interface.*IResponseEvent" -A 2 # Search for any event handler registrations or usages rg "EventHandler.*ResponseEvent" -A 2Length of output: 77
Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (1)
7-14: LGTM! Improved thread safety through immutability.The changes to
ResponseEvent<T>enhance thread safety and encapsulation by:
- Making the
Responseproperty read-only- Ensuring immutability after construction
- Maintaining proper nullability constraints
This aligns well with the PR's goal of addressing threading issues in the WebSocket implementation.
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v1/ISpeakClient.cs (2)
8-15: LGTM! Clear and well-structured deprecation notice.The warning block effectively communicates the deprecation status and migration path to developers.
Line range hint
16-19: Verify the interface inheritance and usage.The interface is properly marked as obsolete while maintaining backward compatibility through inheritance from
ISpeakRESTClient. Let's verify the implementation across the codebase.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation and usage to ensure a complete verification.
Interface inheritance and usage verification completed
The verification confirms proper implementation of the deprecation strategy:
- Both v1 and v2 versions of
ISpeakClientare correctly marked as obsolete and inherit from their respectiveISpeakRESTClient- The concrete implementation exists in
SpeakClientclass- Factory methods support both interfaces:
CreateSpeakClientreturnsISpeakClient(deprecated)CreateSpeakRESTClientreturnsISpeakRESTClient(new)The codebase maintains backward compatibility while properly guiding users to the new interface through deprecation notices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the interface usage and inheritance structure # Test 1: Find all implementations of ISpeakClient echo "=== ISpeakClient implementations ===" ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : $$$ISpeakClient$$$' # Test 2: Check for direct usage of ISpeakClient in method signatures or variable declarations echo -e "\n=== ISpeakClient usage ===" rg "ISpeakClient\s+\w+" --type csharp # Test 3: Verify ISpeakRESTClient exists and its structure echo -e "\n=== ISpeakRESTClient interface ===" fd "ISpeakRESTClient.cs" --exec catLength of output: 4808
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the actual implementation of ISpeakClient and ISpeakRESTClient echo "=== Concrete implementations ===" rg "class.*: .*ISpeakRESTClient" -A 5 --type csharp # Check for any dependency injection or service registration echo -e "\n=== DI Registration ===" rg "AddScoped|AddTransient|AddSingleton.*ISpeakClient|ISpeakRESTClient" --type csharp # Check for factory method implementation echo -e "\n=== Factory Implementation ===" rg "CreateSpeakClient" -A 10 --type csharpLength of output: 2309
Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs (1)
Line range hint
19-22: LGTM: ToString implementation looks good.The implementation correctly uses JsonSerializer with proper escaping.
Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs (2)
10-10: LGTM! Documentation improvement is clear and accurate.The updated documentation for the
Typeproperty better describes its purpose and default value.
7-7: LGTM! Proper implementation of resource management.The implementation of
IDisposableand theDisposemethod follows best practices for managing theMemoryStreamresource:
- Null-conditional operator prevents null reference exceptions
- Stream disposal is handled correctly
Let's verify that this is the only place where
MemoryStreamis used in the WebSocket implementation:Also applies to: 19-28
✅ Verification successful
MemoryStream usage requires additional resource management checks
The review comment's approval needs revision as there are multiple MemoryStream usages across WebSocket implementations that require verification:
AudioResponse.cs(v1 and v2) properly implements IDisposable for the Stream property- However, several WebSocket clients use MemoryStream in their processing methods:
AbstractWebSocketClient.csuses MemoryStream in ProcessReceiveQueueClient.csin both Listen and Speak (v1/v2) implementations inherit and use MemoryStream- Some implementations use MemoryStream without clear disposal patterns
Let's verify the disposal patterns in these implementations:
MemoryStream resource management is properly implemented
After thorough verification, the MemoryStream usage across WebSocket implementations follows proper resource management patterns:
AudioResponse(v1/v2) correctly implements IDisposable for the Stream property- All WebSocket clients properly use
usingstatements for MemoryStream instances in their processing methods:
AbstractWebSocketClient.csusesusing (var ms = new MemoryStream())- Both Listen and Speak clients (v1/v2) inherit from AbstractWebSocketClient or implement proper
usingblocks- All client classes implement IDisposable for cleanup of their resources
The original review comment's approval is correct, as proper resource management patterns are consistently applied across all WebSocket-related MemoryStream usages in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other MemoryStream usages in WebSocket implementations rg -l "MemoryStream" | grep -i "websocket"Length of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the MemoryStream usage in these files to understand the resource management for file in $(rg -l "MemoryStream" | grep -i "websocket"); do echo "=== $file ===" rg "MemoryStream" -A 5 -B 5 "$file" echo -e "\n" doneLength of output: 6594
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for using statements and disposal patterns for file in $(rg -l "MemoryStream" | grep -i "websocket"); do echo "=== $file ===" # Look for using statements with MemoryStream rg -A 10 -B 2 "using.*MemoryStream|IDisposable" "$file" echo -e "\n" doneLength of output: 6078
Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Metadata.cs (1)
1-6: LGTM! File header is well-structured.The copyright notice, license information, and namespace declaration are properly formatted and complete.
Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (2)
1-6: LGTM! Well-structured file header with proper licensing.The file header includes appropriate copyright notice and license information.
5-5: Verify consistent usage of the new v2 error response model.As this is part of the v2 namespace, we should ensure all WebSocket error handling in v2 uses this model consistently.
✅ Verification successful
The previous commands failed due to incorrect glob pattern and language specification. Let's try with simpler patterns to understand the codebase structure and error handling usage.
Error response model is consistently used across v2 WebSocket implementations
The verification shows that the v2 error response model is properly implemented and consistently used:
- The base
ErrorResponseinCommon.v2.WebSocketnamespace is inherited by both Listen and Speak v2 implementations- All v2 WebSocket clients (
Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.csandSpeak/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs) properly handle error responses using the common model- The error handling pattern is consistent across the v2 implementations with proper event subscription and error propagation
- The interfaces (
IListenWebSocketClient,ISpeakWebSocketClient) enforce consistent error handling contractsThe error model is well-integrated into the v2 WebSocket architecture and follows a consistent pattern across different components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of ErrorResponse class in v2 namespace rg -t cs "ErrorResponse" --glob "Deepgram/**/*v2*.cs" # Search for error handling patterns that might not use this model ast-grep --pattern 'catch ($exception) { $$$' --lang c-sharpLength of output: 380
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ErrorResponse usage with correct glob pattern and showing context rg -t cs "ErrorResponse" -C 2 # Search for WebSocket error handling patterns rg -t cs "catch.*WebSocket" -C 2 # List all v2 related C# files to understand the scope fd ".cs$" . | grep -i "v2"Length of output: 22179
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakRESTClient.cs (2)
1-8: LGTM!The file header contains appropriate copyright notice and license information, and the namespace follows the versioning convention.
9-12:⚠️ Potential issueClarify the interface's usage status and purpose.
The comment "Not currently being used" seems inconsistent with the PR objectives, which indicate this is part of a major v2 refactor for WebSocket clients. If this interface is intended for future use, the documentation should explain its purpose and implementation timeline.
Let's verify the interface usage:
Consider replacing the current documentation with:
-/// <summary> -/// Not currently being used -/// </summary> +/// <summary> +/// Defines the contract for v2 of the Speak REST client, providing synchronous and asynchronous +/// methods for text-to-speech conversion using Deepgram's API. +/// </summary>Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs (1)
73-77:⚠️ Potential issueReview Error property implementation.
The Error property needs attention:
- The TODO comment needs to be addressed before merging
- Consider creating a dedicated error DTO instead of using Exception directly
- Missing JSON serialization attributes unlike other properties
Let's check if and how this Error property is used:
Consider this implementation instead:
- // TODO: DYV is this needed??? /// <summary> - /// Error information. + /// Contains error details when the WebSocket operation fails. /// </summary> - public Exception? Error { get; set; } + [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] + [JsonPropertyName("error")] + public ErrorResponse? Error { get; set; }Where
ErrorResponsewould be:public record ErrorResponse { [JsonPropertyName("message")] public string Message { get; init; } = string.Empty; [JsonPropertyName("code")] public string Code { get; init; } = string.Empty; }Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs (4)
6-12: LGTM! Clean namespace organization with version separation.The namespace imports are well-organized using aliases, providing clear separation between v1 and v2 interfaces. This structure aligns well with the versioning strategy.
Line range hint
38-55: LGTM! Well-documented deprecation process.The deprecation handling follows best practices with:
- Clear warning messages
- Proper use of the Obsolete attribute
- Guidance for transitioning to new versions
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
223-245: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionApply consistent versioning pattern across WebSocket clients.
The SpeakWebSocketClient implementation has the same versioning pattern as ListenWebSocketClient. Consider applying the same refactoring to maintain consistency.
Apply the same pattern suggested for ListenWebSocketClient to maintain consistency across the codebase.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'
77-77: Verify handling of obsolete client warnings.The static analysis warnings about obsolete clients are expected as part of the versioning strategy. However, ensure that the deprecation timeline is documented in the migration guide.
Also applies to: 239-239
✅ Verification successful
Obsolete client warnings are properly documented with clear migration paths
The codebase shows a well-structured deprecation strategy:
- All v1 clients are properly marked with
[Obsolete]attributes that specify the new client to use- Deprecation notices include clear migration paths (e.g., "Please use CreateListenWebSocketClient instead")
- Runtime warnings are implemented to notify users about deprecation during execution
- The README.md includes a "Backwards Compatibility" section explaining the support policy for older versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for migration guide documentation rg -l "migration|upgrade|deprecation" docs/Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check if there are any documentation files in the repository fd -t f "README|MIGRATION|UPGRADE|CHANGELOG" -i # Also search for any obsolete/deprecated attributes or comments in the codebase rg -i "obsolete|deprecated|deprecation" -A 2Length of output: 51118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the README files for any migration/upgrade documentation cat Deepgram/README.md README.md examples/README.mdLength of output: 40764
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram.Dev.sln (4)
172-175: LGTM: Project structure aligns with PR objectives.The addition of
stt_v1_client_exampleandtts_v1_client_examplefolders underedge_casesprovides a clear separation for v1 client examples, which aligns with the PR's goal of maintaining backward compatibility while introducing v2 clients.
176-179: LGTM: Project references are properly configured.The new projects are correctly referenced:
Streaming.csprojfor STT v1 client exampleSpeak.csprojfor TTS v1 client example
322-329: LGTM: Build configurations are complete.Both projects are properly configured with Debug and Release configurations, including their respective build and active configuration settings.
411-414: LGTM: Project nesting maintains solution organization.The new projects are correctly nested under the
edge_casesfolder, maintaining the solution's organizational structure:
stt_v1_client_example→{0BF29CA2-1CD6-4FF0-BC7B-B33C6B41E9A1}tts_v1_client_example→{5CEEB2F0-F284-4BB3-8999-6E91151C0C06}✅ Verification successful
Project structure verification confirms correct organization
The verification confirms that both projects exist at their expected paths under the
edge_casesfolder:
tests/edge_cases/stt_v1_client_example/Streaming.csprojtests/edge_cases/tts_v1_client_example/Speak.csprojThis matches the solution file's nesting structure, validating that the project organization is correctly maintained.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify project structure matches solution organization # Test: Check if the projects exist at the expected paths fd -t f "Streaming.csproj" "tests/edge_cases/stt_v1_client_example" fd -t f "Speak.csproj" "tests/edge_cases/tts_v1_client_example"Length of output: 235
Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs (1)
777-781: LGTM!The URI helper method is simple and correctly implements the URI construction logic.
Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs (1)
14-23: LGTM! Well-documented deprecation notice.The deprecation is properly implemented with both XML comments and the
[Obsolete]attribute, providing clear guidance to users about migrating to v2.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IManageClient.cs (2)
5-5: Consider updating the model namespace to match the interface versionThe interface is in the
v2namespace but imports models fromv1withusing Deepgram.Models.Manage.v1;. Ensure this is intentional and consider updating toDeepgram.Models.Manage.v2if appropriate.
175-175: Fix typo in the commentCorrect "Update the scopes fot the member" to "Update the scopes for the member".
[typo]
Apply this diff:
-/// Update the scopes fot the member +/// Update the scopes for the memberDeepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs (1)
31-37: Potential Issue with Options InitializationIn the constructor, if
optionsisnull, it's initialized withnew DeepgramHttpClientOptions(apiKey). However, ifapiKeyis alsonull, this could lead to unintended behavior or exceptions when theHttpClientis configured.Please verify that
apiKeyis notnullwhen initializingDeepgramHttpClientOptions. IfapiKeycan benull, consider handling this case appropriately or enforcing that an API key must be provided.
dvonthenen
force-pushed
the
auto-flush-deadlock-plus-refactor
branch
from
020385e
to
f42b51d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (2)
7-11: Enhance class documentation.Consider adding more detailed XML documentation to explain:
- The purpose and typical usage of this class
- The responsibility for disposing of resources
- Example usage with the
usingstatement/// <summary> -/// LocalFileWithMetadata is a class that represents a file with metadata. +/// Represents a file content in memory along with associated metadata. +/// This class implements IDisposable to ensure proper cleanup of memory resources. /// </summary> +/// <remarks> +/// Use this class with a 'using' statement to ensure proper resource cleanup: +/// <code> +/// using var file = new LocalFileWithMetadata(); +/// file.Content = new MemoryStream(bytes); +/// file.Metadata["key"] = "value"; +/// </code> +/// </remarks>
12-15: Enhance Metadata property documentation.Consider adding more detailed XML documentation to explain:
- The expected key-value pairs
- Whether null values are allowed
- Whether the dictionary can be null
/// <summary> -/// Gets or sets the metadata associated with the file content. +/// Gets or sets a dictionary of string key-value pairs representing metadata associated with the file content. +/// If not initialized, this property may return null. /// </summary> +/// <remarks> +/// Common metadata keys might include: +/// - "content-type": The MIME type of the content +/// - "filename": Original name of the file +/// - "timestamp": When the content was created or modified +/// </remarks>Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (2)
7-37: Consider adding nullable reference annotations.While the properties are marked as nullable with
?, consider adding#nullable enabledirective at the file level to enforce null-safety throughout the class. This aligns with modern C# best practices for null safety.+#nullable enable namespace Deepgram.Models.Common.v2.WebSocket;
7-61: Good alignment with v2 WebSocket architecture.This error response model aligns well with the PR's objectives of improving the WebSocket implementation. The record-based immutable design is particularly suitable for async operations, helping prevent thread-safety issues mentioned in the PR objectives.
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakRESTClient.cs (3)
15-22: Complete the XML documentation for ToStream method.The current documentation is missing details for:
cancellationTokenaddonsheadersAlso, consider documenting potential exceptions that might be thrown.
Here's a suggested documentation improvement:
/// <summary> -/// Speaks a file using the provided stream +/// Converts text to speech using the provided stream /// </summary> /// <param name="source">file is the form of a stream <see cref="Stream"/></param> /// <param name="speakSchema">Options for the transcription <see cref="SpeakSchema"/></param> +/// <param name="cancellationToken">Token to cancel the operation</param> +/// <param name="addons">Additional parameters for the request</param> +/// <param name="headers">Custom headers for the request</param> /// <returns><see cref="SyncResponse"/></returns> +/// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException">Thrown when source is null</exception>
24-25: Add XML documentation for ToFile method.The ToFile method is missing XML documentation completely. This is important for maintaining API documentation consistency.
Add documentation following this template:
/// <summary> /// Converts text to speech and saves the result to a file /// </summary> /// <param name="source">Text content to convert</param> /// <param name="filename">Target file path for the audio output</param> /// <param name="speakSchema">Options for the transcription <see cref="SpeakSchema"/></param> /// <param name="cancellationToken">Token to cancel the operation</param> /// <param name="addons">Additional parameters for the request</param> /// <param name="headers">Custom headers for the request</param> /// <returns><see cref="SyncResponse"/></returns> /// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException">Thrown when source or filename is null</exception> /// <exception cref="IOException">Thrown when file operations fail</exception>
12-39: Consider architectural improvements for better API design.A few suggestions to enhance the interface design:
- Consider using the builder pattern for the optional parameters (SpeakSchema, addons, headers) to improve API usability
- Document the TextSource type and consider making it more specific to text-to-speech use cases
- Consider adding overloads for common use cases to simplify client code
Example of a builder pattern approach:
public interface ISpeakRequestBuilder { ISpeakRequestBuilder WithSchema(SpeakSchema schema); ISpeakRequestBuilder WithAddons(Dictionary<string, string> addons); ISpeakRequestBuilder WithHeaders(Dictionary<string, string> headers); Task<SyncResponse> ToStreamAsync(TextSource source, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default); Task<SyncResponse> ToFileAsync(TextSource source, string filename, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default); Task<AsyncResponse> WithCallbackAsync(TextSource source, string callback, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default); }Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs (3)
77-77: Add JSON serialization attributes for consistency.The
Errorproperty is missing JSON serialization attributes that are present on all other properties. Consider adding them for consistency:/// <summary> /// Error information. /// </summary> + [JsonIgnore(Condition = JsonIgnoreCondition.WhenWritingNull)] + [JsonPropertyName("error")] public Exception? Error { get; set; }
4-5: Add missing using directives.Add the following using directives for types used in the class:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT +using System.Text.Json; +using System.Text.RegularExpressions; + namespace Deepgram.Models.Listen.v2.WebSocket;
51-53: Clarify SpeechFinal property documentation.The current documentation "Is the result a partial result" seems contradictory to the property name
SpeechFinal. Consider updating it to better reflect its purpose:/// <summary> - /// Is the result a partial result. + /// Indicates whether the speech processing for this segment is complete. /// </summary>Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs (3)
37-37: Fix typo in parameter documentation.There's a typo in the
sourceparameter documentation.-/// <param name="source">file is the form of a streasm <see cref="Stream"/></param> +/// <param name="source">File in the form of a stream <see cref="Stream"/></param>
22-23: Document the purpose of optional parameters.The
addonsandheadersdictionary parameters lack documentation explaining their purpose. Consider adding XML documentation for these parameters.Add documentation for the optional parameters:
+/// <param name="cancellationToken">Optional token for canceling the operation</param> +/// <param name="addons">Optional dictionary for additional configuration parameters</param> +/// <param name="headers">Optional dictionary for custom HTTP headers</param>Also applies to: 31-32, 40-42
46-53: Enhance callback-related documentation.The callback functionality would benefit from more detailed documentation:
- Explain what happens when the callback URL is null
- Document the relationship between callbacks and AsyncResponse
- Add remarks about callback URL requirements/format
Add additional documentation to clarify callback behavior:
/// <summary> /// Transcribes a file using the provided byte array and providing a CallBack /// </summary> +/// <remarks> +/// When a callback URL is provided, the transcription results will be sent to the specified endpoint upon completion. +/// The callback URL must be a valid HTTPS endpoint accessible from the Deepgram servers. +/// If the callback URL is null, the transcription will still be processed but no results will be sent. +/// </remarks>Also applies to: 57-64, 68-75
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IAnalyzeClient.cs (1)
92-92: Improve method parameter formatting for readability.Consider breaking down long method signatures into multiple lines for better readability, consistent with other methods in the interface.
- public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeTextCallBack(TextSource source, string? callBack, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, CancellationTokenSource? cancellationToken = default, Dictionary<string, string>? addons = null, Dictionary<string, string>? headers = null); + public Task<AsyncResponse> AnalyzeTextCallBack(TextSource source, string? callBack, AnalyzeSchema? analyzeSchema, + CancellationTokenSource? cancellationToken = default, Dictionary<string, string>? addons = null, + Dictionary<string, string>? headers = null);Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs (1)
33-37: Consider enhancing documentation for single-version clients.The version parameter is accepted but effectively ignored for single-version clients. Consider adding XML documentation to clarify:
- Currently supported versions
- Future versioning plans
- Expected behavior when version parameter is provided
Example documentation addition:
/// <summary> /// This method allows you to create an AnalyzeClient with a specific version of the client. /// </summary> +/// <remarks> +/// Currently, only version 1 is supported. The version parameter is reserved for future use. +/// All version inputs will return the v1 implementation. +/// </remarks>Also applies to: 100-103, 137-141, 174-177, 211-214
Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (2)
67-77: Consider adding error handling for background thread initialization.The background thread initialization for KeepAlive and AutoFlush could fail silently. While the implementation is functional, it would be beneficial to add error handling and status reporting.
if (_deepgramClientOptions.KeepAlive) { Log.Debug("Connect", "Starting KeepAlive Thread..."); - StartKeepAliveBackgroundThread(); + try + { + StartKeepAliveBackgroundThread(); + Log.Debug("Connect", "KeepAlive Thread started successfully"); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Log.Error("Connect", $"Failed to start KeepAlive thread: {ex.Message}"); + throw; + } }
601-605: Simplify empty transcript check.The current check for empty transcript can be simplified using string.IsNullOrEmpty.
-if (resultResponse.Channel.Alternatives.Count == 0 || sentence == "") { +if (resultResponse.Channel.Alternatives.Count == 0 || string.IsNullOrEmpty(sentence)) {Deepgram.Dev.sln (1)
411-414: LGTM: Clear separation of v1 client examples.The nested project structure provides clear organization and separation of v1 client examples. This organization will help developers:
- Easily identify v1 client implementations
- Distinguish between v1 and v2 clients
- Find appropriate examples for their use case
Consider adding README files in both example directories to:
- Explain when to use v1 vs v2 clients
- Document known limitations of v1 clients
- Guide users on migrating to v2 clients when appropriate
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs (1)
35-36: Add null check for HttpClient after factory creation.The HttpClient creation should be validated to ensure the factory methods succeeded.
- _httpClient = HttpClientFactory.Create(httpId); - _httpClient = HttpClientFactory.ConfigureDeepgram(_httpClient, options); + _httpClient = HttpClientFactory.Create(httpId) ?? throw new InvalidOperationException("Failed to create HttpClient"); + _httpClient = HttpClientFactory.ConfigureDeepgram(_httpClient, options) ?? throw new InvalidOperationException("Failed to configure HttpClient");Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs (2)
109-109: Correct the typo 'Excepton' to 'Exception' in log messagesThe log messages contain a typo: 'Excepton' should be 'Exception' at the following lines: 109, 173, 296, 370, 447, 528, 605, 673, and 743.
Apply this diff to correct the typos:
- Log.Verbose("GetAsync<T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("GetAsync<T>", $"Exception: {ex}"); - Log.Verbose("GetAsync<S, T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("GetAsync<S, T>", $"Exception: {ex}"); - Log.Verbose("PostRetrieveLocalFileAsync<R, S, T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("PostRetrieveLocalFileAsync<R, S, T>", $"Exception: {ex}"); - Log.Verbose("PostAsync<S, T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("PostAsync<S, T>", $"Exception: {ex}"); - Log.Verbose("PostAsync<R, S, T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("PostAsync<R, S, T>", $"Exception: {ex}"); - Log.Verbose("PatchAsync<S, T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("PatchAsync<S, T>", $"Exception: {ex}"); - Log.Verbose("PutAsync<S, T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("PutAsync<S, T>", $"Exception: {ex}"); - Log.Verbose("DeleteAsync<T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("DeleteAsync<T>", $"Exception: {ex}"); - Log.Verbose("DeleteAsync<S, T>", $"Excepton: {ex}"); + Log.Verbose("DeleteAsync<S, T>", $"Exception: {ex}");Also applies to: 173-173, 296-296, 370-370, 447-447, 528-528, 605-605, 673-673, 743-743
380-380: Correct the method name in log messageThe log message at line 380 has an incorrect method name. It should be
PostAsync<R, S, T>instead ofPostAsync<S, T>.Apply this diff to correct the method name:
- Log.Debug("PostAsync<S, T>", $"uriSegment: {uriSegment}"); + Log.Debug("PostAsync<R, S, T>", $"uriSegment: {uriSegment}");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
- Deepgram.Dev.sln (3 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/Fakes/ConcreteRestClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AbstractRestClientTests.cs (0 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/SpeakClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/RequestContentUtilTests.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (0 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/Utilities.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractWebSocketClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Utilities.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/WebSocketMessage.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs (10 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Analyze/v1/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v1/ISpeakClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v1/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IAnalyzeClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ILiveClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IManageClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IOnPremClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IPreRecordedClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISelfHostedClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakRESTClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/REST/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UriSegments.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Manage/v1/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/SelfHosted/v1/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/REST/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/UriSegments.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/GlobalUsings.cs (0 hunks)
- Deepgram/ListenWebSocketClient.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/WebSocketType.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Alternative.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Channel.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Hit.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ListenType.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/LiveSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Metadata.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/MetadataResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ModelInfo.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Search.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/SpeechStartedResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UtteranceEndResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Word.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs (1 hunks)
⛔ Files not processed due to max files limit (24)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ClearedResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/FlushedResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/MetadataResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/SpeakSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/SpeakType.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/TextSource.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/WarningResponse.cs
- Deepgram/SpeakWebSocketClient.cs
- examples/speech-to-text/websocket/file/Program.cs
- examples/speech-to-text/websocket/http/Program.cs
- examples/speech-to-text/websocket/microphone/Program.cs
- examples/text-to-speech/websocket/simple/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/keepalive/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/reconnect_same_object/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/stt_v1_client_example/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/stt_v1_client_example/Streaming.csproj
- tests/edge_cases/tts_v1_client_example/Program.cs
- tests/edge_cases/tts_v1_client_example/Speak.csproj
- tests/expected_failures/websocket/exercise_timeout/Program.cs
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AbstractRestClientTests.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs
- Deepgram/GlobalUsings.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Channel.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (60)
- Deepgram.Tests/Fakes/ConcreteRestClient.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/SpeakClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/RequestContentUtilTests.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/Utilities.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractWebSocketClient.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/Utilities.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/WebSocketMessage.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Analyze/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v1/ISpeakClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v1/ResponseEvent.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ILiveClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IOnPremClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IPreRecordedClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISelfHostedClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakClient.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ResponseEvent.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/REST/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UriSegments.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Manage/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/SelfHosted/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/REST/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/ResponseEvent.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v2/WebSocket/UriSegments.cs
- Deepgram/ListenWebSocketClient.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/WebSocketType.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Alternative.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Average.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/CloseResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Hit.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ListenType.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/LiveSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Metadata.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/MetadataResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ModelInfo.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/OpenResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Search.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/SpeechStartedResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UnhandledResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/UtteranceEndResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Word.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/WebSocket/ControlMessage.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v2/WebSocket/AudioResponse.cs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (10)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs (1)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs:392-407 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:02:12.199Z Learning: In the `Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs` file, the user prefers to keep the existing stream handling logic in the `PostAsync<R, S, T>` method.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs (1)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs:392-407 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:02:12.199Z Learning: In the `Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs` file, the user prefers to keep the existing stream handling logic in the `PostAsync<R, S, T>` method.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (2)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs:10-11 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:05:46.981Z Learning: In the `Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs` file, for the `LocalFileWithMetadata` class, the user prefers to defer implementing the full `IDisposable` pattern, considering the current implementation sufficient, and can be changed later without breaking interfaces.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs:15-15 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:26:15.761Z Learning: In the `Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs` file, for the `LocalFileWithMetadata` class, the user chooses to keep the `Metadata` property as-is, without initializing it or adding null checks at this time.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IAnalyzeClient.cs (1)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IAnalyzeClient.cs:21-22 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:07:22.077Z Learning: In this project, methods intentionally use `CancellationTokenSource` instead of `CancellationToken` in their method signatures.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs (2)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs:9-11 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:01:20.963Z Learning: When an interface in `Deepgram.Clients.Interfaces.v2`, such as `IListenRESTClient`, is intentionally left unused for future versions, it's acceptable to include a summary comment stating "Not currently being used."Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs:23-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:00:16.518Z Learning: In this codebase, methods intentionally accept `CancellationTokenSource` parameters to implement per function timeouts, so do not suggest replacing them with `CancellationToken`.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs (2)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs:77-77 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:04:15.779Z Learning: In `IListenWebSocketClient`, the methods `SendKeepAlive`, `SendFinalize`, and `SendClose` send messages on an internal queue and will error or be discarded if the connection is no longer valid, so adding `CancellationToken` parameters is not necessary.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs:25-70 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:14:28.097Z Learning: In the file `Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs`, for the `Subscribe` methods, when the parameter `eventHandler` is self-explanatory, it's acceptable to omit descriptions in the XML documentation. Therefore, I'll avoid flagging missing parameter descriptions for `eventHandler` in `Subscribe` methods.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IManageClient.cs (1)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IManageClient.cs:10-10 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:28:01.526Z Learning: In the file `Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IManageClient.cs`, the `IManageClient` interface is intentionally kept, even though it is not currently used. The comment "Not currently being used" remains to indicate that it may be utilized in the future.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs (5)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs:106-107 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:22:59.455Z Learning: In `Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs`, commented-out methods related to binary send, such as `SpeakWithStream`, `SendBinary`, and `SendBinaryImmediately`, are intentionally left in the code to indicate that binary send is not currently supported.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs:85-85 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:23:10.963Z Learning: In the `ISpeakWebSocketClient` interface, the method `SpeakWithText(string data)` is intentionally named and should not be renamed.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/Client.cs:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-09T02:19:46.086Z Learning: The event subscription methods in the Deepgram .NET SDK cannot be abstracted into a common method due to concrete type requirements for each event handler.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#316 File: Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/WebSocket/v1/Client.cs:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-08-08T19:34:11.728Z Learning: The event subscription methods in the Deepgram .NET SDK cannot be abstracted into a common method due to concrete type requirements for each event handler.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs:25-70 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:14:28.097Z Learning: In the file `Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs`, for the `Subscribe` methods, when the parameter `eventHandler` is self-explanatory, it's acceptable to omit descriptions in the XML documentation. Therefore, I'll avoid flagging missing parameter descriptions for `eventHandler` in `Subscribe` methods.Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (1)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs:609-609 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:08:03.818Z Learning: In the file `Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs`, the direct casting of `resultResponse.IsFinal` to `bool` without null checking is acceptable and preferred.Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs (1)
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/ResultResponse.cs:79-85 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T18:10:11.373Z Learning: In the Deepgram .NET SDK, when implementing `ToString()` methods in model classes (e.g., `ResultResponse.cs` in `Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket`), it's acceptable to let exceptions bubble up when these methods are primarily used in debug messages.
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 775-775:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
[warning] 461-461:
Because this call is not awaited, execution of the current method continues before the call is completed. Consider applying the 'await' operator to the result of the call.
🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 775-775:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
[warning] 461-461:
Because this call is not awaited, execution of the current method continues before the call is completed. Consider applying the 'await' operator to the result of the call.
🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 775-775:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
[warning] 461-461:
Because this call is not awaited, execution of the current method continues before the call is completed. Consider applying the 'await' operator to the result of the call.
🪛 GitHub Check: build
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/AbstractRestClient.cs
[warning] 775-775:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
[warning] 239-239:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Speak.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs
[warning] 461-461:
Because this call is not awaited, execution of the current method continues before the call is completed. Consider applying the 'await' operator to the result of the call.
🔇 Additional comments (23)
Deepgram/Abstractions/v2/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (3)
1-5: LGTM! Well-documented file header.The copyright notice and license information are properly included.
26-32: Verify disposal safety in concurrent scenarios.The current disposal implementation might not be thread-safe if
Disposeis called while other threads are still accessing theContent. Consider documenting any assumptions about concurrent access during disposal.
17-24: Verify thread safety requirements.The
Contentproperty might be accessed from multiple threads when used with WebSocket clients. Consider documenting any thread-safety guarantees or limitations.Deepgram/Models/Common/v2/WebSocket/ErrorResponse.cs (2)
1-5: LGTM! Proper license and copyright headers.The file includes appropriate copyright notice and license information.
38-53: Previous review comment about null checking is still applicable.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakRESTClient.cs (1)
9-12: Clarify interface usage status and improve documentation.The comment "Not currently being used" is concerning as this interface is part of the v2 implementation mentioned in the PR objectives. If this interface is intended for use, please:
- Remove or update this comment
- Add comprehensive documentation explaining the interface's purpose, usage, and how it differs from v1
Let's verify if this interface is actually used:
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs (1)
12-14: Verify interface integration with WebSocket changes.This v2 interface is part of a larger refactor involving WebSocket client changes. Please ensure:
- The REST client implementation aligns with the new threading model mentioned in the PR objectives
- The factory methods for v2 clients properly expose this interface
Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IAnalyzeClient.cs (3)
9-11: Previous comment about misleading documentation is still applicable.
12-94: Interface design looks good!The interface provides a well-structured API for both synchronous and asynchronous analysis operations. The consistent parameter patterns and clear separation between callback and non-callback methods make it easy to use and extend.
5-7: Verify v1 model usage in v2 interface.The interface is in the v2 namespace but uses models from v1 (
Deepgram.Models.Analyze.v1). Please verify if this is intentional or if corresponding v2 models should be created for consistency.✅ Verification successful
Using v1 models in v2 interfaces appears to be the established pattern
The verification shows this is consistent with the codebase's architecture - all v2 interfaces (
ISelfHostedClient,IListenRESTClient,ILiveClient, etc.) use v1 models from their respective domains. This appears to be an intentional design choice where v2 represents interface/client changes while retaining v1 models.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other v2 interfaces using v1 models rg -l "namespace.*\.v2" | xargs rg "using.*\.v1"Length of output: 1079
Deepgram/ClientFactory.cs (3)
6-12: LGTM! Clean namespace organization.The version-specific imports are well-organized using clear aliases, making the distinction between v1 and v2 implementations explicit.
Line range hint
42-50: LGTM! Well-structured deprecation notices.The deprecation handling follows best practices with:
- Clear warning blocks in documentation
- Proper use of Obsolete attributes
- Explicit migration guidance
Also applies to: 180-190
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'
69-83: Consider consolidating version handling logic.While the current implementation works, there are opportunities to reduce duplication:
- Version handling logic is duplicated between Listen and Speak clients
- Deprecation logging messages are repeated
- TODO comments about reflection suggest future improvements
However, I understand from past discussions that these implementation details are being kept as is for now.
Let's verify the version handling is consistent across the codebase:
Also applies to: 231-244
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 77-77:
'Client' is obsolete: 'Please use Deepgram.Clients.Listen.v2.WebSocket instead'Deepgram/Clients/Listen/v2/WebSocket/Client.cs (3)
19-20: LGTM: Thread-safe timestamp tracking implementation.The implementation correctly uses
SemaphoreSlimfor thread-safe access to the_lastReceivedtimestamp, which is essential for the auto-flush functionality.
609-609: Direct boolean cast is acceptable.The direct casting of
resultResponse.IsFinaltoboolwithout null checking is acceptable as per the learnings from the previous review.
573-579: LGTM: Robust URI construction.The
GetUrimethod effectively handles parameter serialization and URL encoding, making good use of LINQ for property filtering.Deepgram.Dev.sln (2)
172-179: LGTM: Project structure follows solution conventions.The new v1 client example projects are appropriately placed under the edge_cases directory, which aligns with the PR's goal of maintaining backward compatibility for users who don't experience deadlock issues.
322-329: LGTM: Project configurations are properly set up.Both Debug and Release configurations are correctly defined for the new projects, maintaining consistency with the existing solution structure.
Deepgram/Abstractions/v1/AbstractRestClient.cs (3)
1-11: LGTM: Clean namespace organization.The namespace structure properly isolates v1 implementation, aligning with the PR's objective of maintaining backward compatibility while introducing v2 clients.
86-86: Avoid synchronous .Result calls to prevent deadlocks.The synchronous
ReadAsStringAsync().Resultcalls throughout the HTTP methods can lead to deadlocks.Also applies to: 149-149, 345-345, 422-422, 502-502, 580-580, 648-648, 718-718
748-775: LGTM: Robust exception handling with proper null checks.The exception handling is well-structured:
- Early return for null/empty error messages via
EnsureSuccessStatusCode()- Attempt to deserialize as
DeepgramRESTException- Fallback to generic
DeepgramExceptionThe static analysis warning about possible null
errMsgcan be safely ignored as the null check at line 750 ensureserrMsgis non-null when reaching line 774.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test (8.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: test (7.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: test (6.0.x)
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.🪛 GitHub Check: build
[warning] 774-774:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'errMsg' in 'DeepgramException.DeepgramException(string errMsg)'.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs (1)
15-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider using
CancellationTokeninstead ofCancellationTokenSourcein method signaturesIn the methods
ConnectandStop, the parameters are of typeCancellationTokenSource? cancelToken = null. It's standard practice in .NET to accept aCancellationTokenrather than aCancellationTokenSourcein asynchronous method signatures. This aligns with the Task-based Asynchronous Pattern and allows callers to use existing cancellation tokens more effectively.Apply the following changes to update the method signatures:
-public Task<bool> Connect(LiveSchema options, CancellationTokenSource? cancelToken = null, Dictionary<string, string>? addons = null, - Dictionary<string, string>? headers = null); +public Task<bool> Connect(LiveSchema options, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default, Dictionary<string, string>? addons = null, + Dictionary<string, string>? headers = null); -public Task<bool> Stop(CancellationTokenSource? cancelToken = null, bool nullByte = false); +public Task<bool> Stop(CancellationToken cancellationToken = default, bool nullByte = false);Also applies to: 18-18
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenWebSocketClient.cs:77-77 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:04:15.779Z Learning: In `IListenWebSocketClient`, the methods `SendKeepAlive`, `SendFinalize`, and `SendClose` send messages on an internal queue and will error or be discarded if the connection is no longer valid, so adding `CancellationToken` parameters is not necessary.Learnt from: dvonthenen PR: deepgram/deepgram-dotnet-sdk#345 File: Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/IListenRESTClient.cs:23-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T19:00:16.518Z Learning: In this codebase, methods intentionally accept `CancellationTokenSource` parameters to implement per function timeouts, so do not suggest replacing them with `CancellationToken`.Deepgram/Clients/Interfaces/v2/ISpeakWebSocketClient.cs (1)
102-107: Maintain consistency in commented-out codeThe methods
SpeakWithStream,SendBinary, andSendBinaryImmediatelyare intentionally commented out to indicate that binary send is not currently supported, as per previous learnings. Ensure that the commenting style is consistent across these methods.Also applies to: 120-125, 133-137
dvonthenen
force-pushed
the
auto-flush-deadlock-plus-refactor
branch
from
df52ddd
to
22518be
Compare
Proposed changes
Addresses: #344, #308
It was discovered that the threading model/functions used were such that different OS threads were being created for each thread (ie, Send, Receive, KeepAlive, for example) and also that the locking mechanism to keep exclusivity on the send functions would not work on systems where the logical (not physical) CPU count was low (ie, 2 Logical CPUs up to 4ish) leading to a deadlock state.
Identified the issue has been there since the very first PR for v4 (Note1, Note2). Most CPUs these days have 6-8 or more cores which is why this probably wasn't reported. My guess is that this manifested itself by using a VM with 2 CPUs because modern systems have 6+ cores these days, but in virtual machines, you can (and there are reasons to) have 2 vCPUs. The threading and locking model was changed to be in-line with .NET Async best practices, thus correcting the problem.
Since this was a breaking API change, this PR includes:
awaitkeyword when calling, thus breaking the interfacenew Clientdirectly)v1clients without changing your codeOther significant notes:
v1clients and they work as expected. These examples are located at:tests/edge_cases/stt_v1_client_exampletests/edge_cases/tts_v1_client_examplev1interface is there, user's application will still compile and work as expected giving individuals time to migrate to this new interface in their own timeTypes of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to the community .NET SDK?
Put an
xin the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
xin the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.Further comments
NA
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
stt_v1_client_example) and text-to-speech (tts_v1_client_example) functionalities.AnalyzeClient,ManageClient, andSpeakClient, ensuring robust error handling and validation.OpenResponse,CloseResponse, andErrorResponse, improving event handling.Bug Fixes
Deprecations
Documentation