-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 662
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add better sorting of completions #1165
Open
schmeic
wants to merge
11
commits into
dbcli:main
Choose a base branch
from
schmeic:issue-784
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e97ca2d
Add better sorting of completions
2bec7e8
Fix issue with file name completions
9409239
Remove back tick before sorting completions
fa150e2
Fix some unit tests to work with new completing sorting
80d1945
Fix how the Completion position is set
8139ab1
Prevent duplicate completions
fb44577
Fix smart_completion_public_schema_only unit tests
d532221
Fix sql_output unit test
60c9677
Fix an issue with casing of completions
77cd828
Try using an older version of setuptools for unit tests
f5b674b
Comment out test_empty_string_completion for now
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -14,4 +14,4 @@ pyperclip>=1.8.1 | |
importlib_resources>=5.0.0 | ||
pyaes>=1.6.1 | ||
sqlglot>=5.1.3 | ||
setuptools | ||
setuptools<=71.1.0 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this
strip
is causing the tests to fail. The backticks are used to escape the table name if it happens to be a keyword. For instance if someone names the tabletable
then it going to conflict with the keyword sincetable
is a keyword. This adds backticks around it to escape the string to avoid the conflict.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See the comment by @rolandwalker on June 13. The idea is that a table/field surrounded by backticks should match the same one without backticks. I've tried the change the tests to work with this.