Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add license (BSD 3-Clause license). #151

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023
Merged

Add license (BSD 3-Clause license). #151

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023

Conversation

aleberti
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@aleberti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Not sure the static code check fails... offline it does not give any error.

@aleberti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Not sure the static code check fails... offline it does not give any error.

solved by fixing numpy version.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jsitarek jsitarek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the PR has also some fixes on CI, and I have a small comment to it, but it can also stay like this if there is a reason for it.

setup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@aleberti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ok, now 1 test out of 60 is failing, and I would say I am "happy", in the sense that the test that was failing for me offline, now it fails here too (no idea why it was not failing before in the other branch, maybe the fixing of numpy version is the culprit?). I would say we can merge anyway, what do you think @jsitarek ? Then we can fix the file/test afterwards.

@aleberti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ok, now 1 test out of 60 is failing, and I would say I am "happy", in the sense that the test that was failing for me offline, now it fails here too (no idea why it was not failing before in the other branch, maybe the fixing of numpy version is the culprit?). I would say we can merge anyway, what do you think @jsitarek ? Then we can fix the file/test afterwards.

correction: the test failing here is different, it is test_load_train_data_files_off while for me it was test_load_train_data_files_g.

@jsitarek
Copy link
Collaborator

looking at the past few merged PRs everything was green with python 3.7 and started failing in mysterious places with 3.8. Now with a consistent error it is indeed better. Let's do like this: first merge the fix of the CI in the PR #152 (is it the same one as here??), and then we merge this thing about the licence from this PR. Afterwards we can work on fixing the remaining problem.

@aleberti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

looking at the past few merged PRs everything was green with python 3.7 and started failing in mysterious places with 3.8. Now with a consistent error it is indeed better. Let's do like this: first merge the fix of the CI in the PR #152 (is it the same one as here??), and then we merge this thing about the licence from this PR. Afterwards we can work on fixing the remaining problem.

well, not consistent error, the test failing is different from the one I had on my machine. Anyway yes, the CI changes are the same. If you approve the other MR, I then merge that and finally this one.

@aleberti aleberti merged commit defaaf8 into master Sep 25, 2023
2 of 4 checks passed
@aleberti aleberti deleted the add_license branch September 25, 2023 17:55
@aleberti aleberti added the maintenance Maintenance related label Nov 2, 2023
Elisa-Visentin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
Add license (BSD 3-Clause license).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance Maintenance related
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants