Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New production config 20221128_src5_dec3476_tuned #375

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2022

Conversation

alvmas
Copy link
Contributor

@alvmas alvmas commented Nov 29, 2022

New Prod config

Prod_ID

20221128_src5_dec3476_tuned

Short description of the config

dec_3476 with NSB tuning to src5 and src-dependent configuration.

Why this config is needed

Reprocess the data at declination 34.76 with version of lstchain v0.9.9 and with new tunning for new source: src5.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 30.69% // Head: 30.69% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (a3e6d6e) compared to base (594a9b0).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #375   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   30.69%   30.69%           
=======================================
  Files          45       45           
  Lines        2769     2769           
=======================================
  Hits          850      850           
  Misses       1919     1919           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@vuillaut vuillaut merged commit 6f83a60 into cta-observatory:master Nov 29, 2022
@vuillaut
Copy link
Member

Production running 🚀

@vuillaut
Copy link
Member

vuillaut commented Dec 5, 2022

Hi @alvmas
I overlooked something for that production: the source-dependent analysis is trained on point-source gammas, which was not the case here.
See discussion here: #191

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants