Adding bun v1.1.31

[EmmanuelOga]

Checklist

• Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• Source is from official source.
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
• Build number is 0.
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR () and found it was in an excellent condition.

[EmmanuelOga]

Points I'm not sure about:

• There are many licenses for linked libraries, not sure if I need to add a license for each of these
  https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/main/LICENSE.md

• The build uses no tarballs since bun is distributed in binary form (building bun requires bun, so I'm guessing is not a good idea to build from source and we should benefit form the binaries).

• Haven't posted my message to "at" conda-forge/staged-recipes since I'm still reviewing this myself.

Cheers!

[EmmanuelOga]

Also not sure if I need to do something about this:

❯ unzip -l bun-darwin-aarch64
Archive:  bun-darwin-aarch64.zip
  Length      Date    Time    Name
---------  ---------- -----   ----
        0  10-16-2024 22:23   bun-darwin-aarch64/
 60716192  10-16-2024 22:23   bun-darwin-aarch64/bun
---------                     -------
 60716192                     2 files

... that is, the file structure is not flat, so the build script may need to be changed?

Maybe this could work?

build:
  number: 0
  script:
    - mkdir -p $PREFIX/bin
    - mv */bun $PREFIX/bin # Add "*" to match any extracted folder

[EmmanuelOga]

It is failing to find the meta.yml file, apparently, for some reason.

https://dev.azure.com/conda-forge/84710dde-1620-425b-80d0-4cf5baca359d/_apis/build/builds/1058780/logs/39

2024-10-19T05:22:17.1902420Z + python .ci_support/build_all.py
2024-10-19T05:22:17.1903860Z Building all recipes
2024-10-19T05:22:17.9542300Z Traceback (most recent call last):
2024-10-19T05:22:17.9603630Z   File "/Users/runner/work/1/s/.ci_support/build_all.py", line 340, in <module>
2024-10-19T05:22:17.9684690Z     build_all(os.path.join(root_dir, "recipes"), args.arch)
2024-10-19T05:22:17.9709100Z   File "/Users/runner/work/1/s/.ci_support/build_all.py", line 99, in build_all
2024-10-19T05:22:17.9731030Z     raise ValueError("Neither a meta.yaml or a recipe.yaml recipes was found")
2024-10-19T05:22:17.9761570Z ValueError: Neither a meta.yaml or a recipe.yaml recipes was found

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/bun/recipe.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/bun/recipe.yaml:

• license_file entry is missing, but is required.