Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added more ZDC functionality to DQM #46478

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cfmcginn
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR is to replace existing, closed PR here: #45948

The PR adds to the DQM for ZDC specific histograms, via ZDCQIE10Task

This PR is updated relative to the closed previous PR, mostly fixing build issue, retitling some histograms, and updating python such that emulated ZDC sums fill. Another PR exists where it is rebased to 14_1_X for backport, currently open here #46407.

PR validation:

The PR is tested in CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-20-0000, after running a merge-topic to incorporate the PR into a fresh area
scram b ran successfully, validating the build

Following test command produces the expected output:

cmsRun DQM/Integration/python/clients/hcal_dqm_sourceclient-live_cfg.py inputFiles=/eos/cms/store/group/dpg_hcal/comm_hcal/PFG/backup_raw/HIHLTPhysics-HIRun2023A-RAW-v1-375754.root runkey=hi_run

under the upload directory, if using the offline candidate GT. Inspected histograms inside the DQM file appear reasonable for ZDC sums.

In addition, the following set of commands are run
scram b runtests
scram build code-checks
scram build code-format

code-checks revealed no issues, code-format offered no suggestions. runtests had multiple failures, detailed below - however, every failure existed already with runtests in a fresh area, and matches the set of failures documented already in the backport. As such, it is unclear the failures are the result of the PR

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

As mentioned above, this PR is to replace the closed PR #45948, and is paired to the backport to CMSSW_14_1_X, found here #46407

@cfmcginn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hjbossi @mandrenguyen

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 22, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @cfmcginn for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/HcalTasks (dqm)
  • DQM/Integration (dqm)

@antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@DryRun, @abdoulline, @batinkov, @bsunanda, @denizsun, @francescobrivio, @salimcerci, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@antoniovagnerini
Copy link

please test

process.load("Configuration.StandardSequences.FrontierConditions_GlobalTag_cff")
process.GlobalTag.globaltag = autoCond['run3_data_prompt']
process.load("Configuration.StandardSequences.FrontierConditions_GlobalTag_cff")
process.GlobalTag.globaltag = '141X_dataRun3_Prompt_Candidate_2024_10_08_09_42_50'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

none of the comments of the 14.1.X backport was addressed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I opted to get this up such that it was faithful to the backport version code - happy to address the comments now, will go thru and recommit

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding: I will go thru and update this PR and the backport simultaneously

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Responded issue-by-issue in backport thread, all suggestions adopted, both PRs updated

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #46478 was updated. @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please check and sign again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants