Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move IPFS pinning related code behind local node build flag #16866

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kylehickinson
Copy link
Collaborator

@kylehickinson kylehickinson commented Jan 25, 2023

Small build regression fix from #16073

Resolves

Submitter Checklist:

  • I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed, or that I have requested one
  • There is a ticket for my issue
  • Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
  • Wrote a good PR/commit description
  • Squashed any review feedback or "fixup" commits before merge, so that history is a record of what happened in the repo, not your PR
  • Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
  • Checked the PR locally:
    • npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests wiki
    • npm run lint, npm run presubmit wiki, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
  • Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

  • A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
  • New files have MPL-2.0 license header
  • Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
  • Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
  • Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
  • Code follows the style guide
  • Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

Test Plan:

@kylehickinson kylehickinson self-assigned this Jan 25, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@cypt4 cypt4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -47,13 +48,15 @@ class IPFSJSONParser {
static std::string RemovePeerFromConfigJSON(const std::string& json,
const std::string& peer_id,
const std::string& address);
#if BUILDFLAG(ENABLE_IPFS_LOCAL_NODE)
// Local pins
static absl::optional<ipfs::AddPinResult> GetAddPinsResultFromJSON(
Copy link
Member

@yrliou yrliou Jan 25, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should probably guard header includes for these *PinResult structs too.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We probably want to take it even further then, right? There are instances of including ipfs_local_pin_service for instance in the brave_wallet component

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, for any headers that's only built when ENABLE_IPFS_LOCAL_NODE is true should be guarded with it. cc @cypt4

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added guards to headers and moved the pin service in wallet to be behind buildflag

@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ void IpfsService::OnPreWarmComplete(
std::move(prewarm_callback_for_testing_).Run();
}

#if BUILDFLAG(ENABLE_IPFS_LOCAL_NODE)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should guard the declarations in the header file too.

@yrliou
Copy link
Member

yrliou commented Jan 26, 2023

supersede by #16873

@yrliou yrliou closed this Jan 26, 2023
@yrliou yrliou added this to the Closed milestone Jan 26, 2023
@kylehickinson kylehickinson deleted the ios-ipfs-build-fix branch February 21, 2024 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants